Literature DB >> 16038822

Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for longterm outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function.

Alexandre Rault1, Antonio SaCunha, Daniel Klopfenstein, Dominique Larroudé, Frédéric N Dobo Epoy, Denis Collet, Bernard Masson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function after pancreaticoduodenectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Pancreatic exocrine function was evaluated by a questionnaire and medical examination of stools after discontinuing pancreatic enzyme supplements for at least 10 days. Severe steatorrhea was defined as frequent, nauseating, yellow, and pasty stools, fecal output >200 g/d for more than 3 days. Endocrine function was evaluated by blood glucose level. Association between severe steatorrhea and age, indication, histologic obstructive pancreatitis, pancreaticojejunal anastomosis (PJA), pancreaticogastric anastomosis (PGA), and morbidity was studied.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, complication rate was 33%. PJA was performed in 41 patients (79%) and PGA in 11 patients (21%). At a median followup of 75 months (24 to 156 months), 65% of the patients received pancreatic enzyme supplements. Severe steatorrhea was observed in 22 patients (42%). Incidence of postoperative diabetes was 14.6%. Patient age (more than 60 years), postoperative complication, and obstructive pancreatitis were not associated with postoperative severe steatorrhea. In cases of nonhistologic obstructive pancreatitis, PGA was more frequently associated with severe steatorrhea than PJA (70% versus 21.7%, p < 0.025). No factor significantly influenced incidence of postoperative diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: After pancreaticoduodenectomy, 42% of patients presented with severe steatorrhea. PJA allows better pancreatic exocrine function preservation than PGA and should be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16038822     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  24 in total

1.  Exocrine function following the whipple operation as assessed by stool elastase.

Authors:  Joe Matsumoto; L William Traverso
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Niedergethmann; Niloufar Dusch; Rizky Widyaningsih; Christel Weiss; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  James R A Skipworth; Clare Morkane; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Soumil Vyas; Steven W Olde Damink; Charles J Imber; Stephen P Pereira; Massimo Malago; Nicholas West; Robin K S Phillips; Sue K Clark; Arjun Shankar
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Ren-Chao Zhang; Bin Zhang; Yi-Ping Mou; Xiao-Wu Xu; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Chao-Jie Huang; Jia-Yu Zhou; Wei-Wei Jin; Chao Lu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasm.

Authors:  A Dedieu; A Rault; D Collet; B Masson; A Sa Cunha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Identification of risk factors for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy using a 13C-labeled mixed triglyceride breath test.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Yoshiaki Murakami; Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Ken-ichi Okada; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Naru Kondo; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad Hamdy; Ahmad M Sultan; Tarek Salah; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Mohamed Said; Mostaffa Abu Zeied; Tallat Abdallah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Factors affecting outcome after Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Anbalagan Amudhan; Tirupporur Govindaswamy Balachandar; Devy Gounder Kannan; Govindhasamy Rajarathinam; Vellayudham Vimalraj; Shanmugasundaram Rajendran; Palanisamy Ravichandran; Satyanesan Jeswanth; Rajagopal Surendran
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Experience of limited pancreatic head resection for management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a single center.

Authors:  Kwang Yeol Paik; Seong Ho Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.