Literature DB >> 7574936

A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

C J Yeo1, J L Cameron, M M Maher, P K Sauter, M L Zahurak, M A Talamini, K D Lillemoe, H A Pitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that pancreaticogastrostomy is safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy and less likely to be associated with a postoperative pancreatic fistula. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreatic fistula is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy, occurring in 10% to 20% of patients. Nonrandomized reports have suggested that pancreaticogastrostomy is less likely than pancreaticojejunostomy to be associated with postoperative complications.
METHODS: Between May 1993 and January 1995, the findings for 145 patients were analyzed in this prospective trial at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. After giving their appropriate preoperative informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to pancreaticogastrostomy or pancreaticojejunostomy after completion of the pancreaticoduodenal resection. All pancreatic anastomoses were performed in two layers without pancreatic duct stents and with closed suction drainage. Pancreatic fistula was defined as drainage of greater than 50 mL of amylase-rich fluid on or after postoperative day 10.
RESULTS: The pancreaticogastrostomy (n = 73) and pancreaticojejunostomy (n = 72) groups were comparable with regard to multiple parameters, including demographics, medical history, preoperative laboratory values, and intraoperative factors, such as operative time, blood transfusions, pancreatic texture, length of pancreatic remnant mobilized, and pancreatic duct diameter. The overall incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 11.7% (17/145). The incidence of pancreatic fistula was similar for the pancreaticogastrostomy (12.3%) and pancreaticojejunostomy (11.1%) groups. Pancreatic fistula was associated with a significant prolongation of postoperative hospital stay (36 +/- 5 vs. 15 +/- 1 days) (p < 0.001). Factors significantly increasing the risk of pancreatic fistula by univariate logistic regression analysis included ampullary or duodenal disease, soft pancreatic texture, longer operative time, greater intraoperative red blood cell transfusions, and lower surgical volume (p < 0.05). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the factors most highly associated with pancreatic fistula to be lower surgical volume and ampullary or duodenal disease in the resected specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic fistula is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy, with an incidence most strongly associated with surgical volume and underlying disease. These data do not support the hypothesis that pancreaticogastrostomy is safer than pancreaticojejunostomy or is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7574936      PMCID: PMC1234894          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199510000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  40 in total

1.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Ligation versus implantation of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  H S Goldsmith; B C Ghosh; A G Huvos
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-01

Review 3.  Restoration of continuity following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  T E Madiba; S R Thomson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Current experience with pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  G R Mason; R J Freeark
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  C D Park; J A Mackie; J E Rhoads
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M Montorsi; M Zago; F Mosca; L Capussotti; E Zotti; G Ribotta; G Fegiz; S Fissi; G Roviaro; A Peracchia
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Erythromycin accelerates gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  C J Yeo; M K Barry; P K Sauter; S Sostre; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pancreaticogastrostomy: preferred reconstruction for Whipple resection.

Authors:  D M Morris; R S Ford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Successful pancreatojejunal anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Y Matsumoto; H Fujii; K Miura; S Inoue; T Sekikawa; H Aoyama; N Ohnishi; K Sakai; K Suda
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-12

10.  Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management.

Authors:  J J Cullen; M G Sarr; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  228 in total

1.  Does prophylactic octreotide benefit patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection?

Authors:  C J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Two-stage trauma pancreaticoduodenectomy: delay facilitates anastomotic reconstruction.

Authors:  L G Koniaris; A K Mandal; T Genuit; J L Cameron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Recent advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Shankar; R C Russell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access.

Authors:  A Sowden; V Aletras; M Place; N Rice; A Eastwood; R Grilli; B Ferguson; J Posnett; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-06

Review 5.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Miroslav Ryska; Jan Rudis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Prevention, evaluation, and treatment of leaks after gastrointestinal surgery : prevention of leaks after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ronnie T P Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Kelvin K Ng; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; M Fatih Can; Mustapha Daouadi; Harold T Huss; Jennifer Y Steve; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Michael Stang; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect?

Authors:  James M Kiely; Attila Nakeeb; Richard A Komorowski; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.