Literature DB >> 23877382

Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Erhan Sari1, Abdulkadir Tepeler, Emrah Yuruk, Berkan Resorlu, Tolga Akman, Murat Binbay, Abdullah Armagan, Ali Unsal, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

The aim of the study to compare outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with different body mass index (BMI) scores and to explore whether the BMI has an effect on outcomes of RIRS. Five hundred and two patients who underwent flexible URS in 3 centers between 2008 and 2012 for the management of single upper urinary tract calculi were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as normal weight BMI 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m(2), overweight 25 to 29.99 kg/m(2), obese 30 to 39.99 kg/m(2) and morbid obese >40 kg/m(2).The groups were assessed in terms of demographic parameters including age, gender, stone size, intraoperative and postoperative variables. The mean patient age was 41.3 ± 15.51 (18-81) years and with an average BMI 26.68 ± 5.2 kg/m(2) (16.64-55.15 kg/m²). Of the patients, 43.2 % had normal weight (NW), 32.2 % were overweight (OW), 21.9 % were obese (O) and 2.5 % were morbidly obese (MO). Stone-free rates after single procedure in NW, OW, O, MO groups were 60.8, 61.7, 73.6, 61.5 %, respectively (p = 0.079). Overall targeted stone-free rates were also similar in four groups (88.9, 90.1, 93.6, 90.4 %, p = 0.586). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of complications and mean hospitalization time among the groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that flexible URS is a valuable option for the treatment of kidney stone in both obese and non-obese patients. BMI did not influence the postoperative outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877382     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0590-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  27 in total

1.  Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Mesut Ugurlu; Mehmet Kaba; Muzaffer Akcay; Ozgur Yazici; Faruk Ozgor; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures?

Authors:  Murat Binbay; Emrah Yuruk; Tolga Akman; Faruk Ozgor; Mahir Seyrek; Unsal Ozkuvanci; Yalcin Berberoglu; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Percutaneous lithotripsy in morbid obesity.

Authors:  C C Carson; J E Danneberger; J L Weinerth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  G J Faerber; M Goh
Journal:  Tech Urol       Date:  1997

5.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm.

Authors:  Omer F Bozkurt; Berkan Resorlu; Yildiray Yildiz; Ceren E Can; Ali Unsal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Ureterorenoscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet fragmentation is a safe and efficient technique for stone treatment in patients with a body mass index superior to 30 kg/m2.

Authors:  Gregory Delorme; Yann Nguyen Huu; Julien Lillaz; Stéphane Bernardini; Eric Chabannes; Guillaume Guichard; Hugues Bittard; François Kleinclauss
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The impact of body mass index on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery.

Authors:  Turhan Caskurlu; Gokhan Atis; Ozgur Arikan; Eyup Sabri Pelit; Mert Kilic; Cenk Gurbuz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Lithogenic risk factors in the morbidly obese population.

Authors:  Branden G Duffey; Renato N Pedro; Carly Kriedberg; Derek Weiland; Jonathan Melquist; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Todd Kellogg; Antoine A Makhlouf; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter.

Authors:  Dimitrios Delakas; Ioannis Karyotis; George Daskalopoulos; Emmanuel Lianos; Emmanuel Mavromanolakis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Outpatient basis extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureter stones: efficacy of the third generation lithotripter as the first line treatment.

Authors:  Akiko Murota-Kawano; Kazuhiro Ohya; Hideaki Sekine
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.369

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of ureterorenoscopy for renal stones].

Authors:  F Schott; S Knipper; A K Orywal; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Marcel Fiedler; Nikos Charalampogiannis; Ahmet Sinan Kabakci; Remzi Saglam; Jan-Thorsten Klein
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 2.

Authors:  Özcan Kılıç; Murat Akand; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

6.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation.

Authors:  Ural Oğuz; Melih Balci; Gokhan Atis; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Altug Tuncel; Fikret Halis; Yilmaz Aslan; Ismail Okan Yildirim; Cagri Senocak; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Atan; Turhan Caskurlu; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.

Authors:  Guido M Kamphuis; Joyce Baard; Matias Westendarp; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of 10-20 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Fatih Elbir; Omer Sarilar; Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Murat Binbay; Ali Ihsan Tasci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Husain Alenezi; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23

10.  Efficacy and safety of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Fatih Akbulut; Onur Kucuktopcu; Emre Kandemir; Burak Ucpinar; Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Burak Arslan; Akif Erbin; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Binbay; Gokhan Gurbuz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.