Literature DB >> 22141372

Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis.

Tolga Akman1, Murat Binbay, Mesut Ugurlu, Mehmet Kaba, Muzaffer Akcay, Ozgur Yazici, Faruk Ozgor, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients with stones of moderate size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2008 and June 2011, a total of 28 patients over 65 years of age with single renal stones that measured 1.5 to 3 cm were treated with RIRS. The outcomes of these patients were compared with those of the patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). The matching parameters were the size and location of the stone as well as age, sex, body mass index, degree of hydronephrosis, presence of previous shockwave lithotripsy, and open surgery. SPSS version 16 was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 82.1% of patients for the RIRS and 92.8% of patients for the PCNL group. The second flexible ureterorenoscopy procedure was performed for five patients in the RIRS group. Finally, stone-free rates during the third month of the follow-up period were 92.8% in the RIRS group and 96.4% in the PCNL group. The mean operative time per patient was 64.5 ± 20.9 minutes in the RIRS group after a total of 33 procedures, while it was 40.7 ± 10.7 minutes in the PCNL groups (P<0.0001). The overall complication rates for the RIRS and PCNL groups were 7.1% and 10.7%, respectively. Blood transfusions were needed in two patients in the PCNL group. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the RIRS group (26.5 ± 10.6 h per patient vs 60.0 ± 28.8 h; P<0.0001). In both groups, stones were most frequently composed of calcium oxalate (68.4% in the RIRS group and 77.7% in the PCNL group).
CONCLUSION: RIRS has a low complication rate and represents a safe and effective treatment alternative in selected geriatric patients with kidney stones of moderate size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22141372     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly.

Authors:  Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Deng He; Lei Cui; Jiaqiao Zhang; Zhenyu Zhao; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Feng Lin; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nihat Karakoyunlu; Goksel Goktug; Nevzat Can Şener; Kursad Zengin; Ismail Nalbant; Ufuk Ozturk; Ugur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 1.

Authors:  Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Özcan Kılıç; Murat Akand
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 4.  Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function.

Authors:  Ozden Ender; Necmettin Mercimek Mehmet
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

5.  Does body mass index effect the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Abdülmuttalip Şimşek; Faruk Özgör; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Onur Küçüktopçu; Ahmet Yalçın Berberoğlu; Ömer Sarılar; Murat Binbay; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

6.  Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Erhan Sari; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Emrah Yuruk; Berkan Resorlu; Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Abdullah Armagan; Ali Unsal; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.

Authors:  Guido M Kamphuis; Joyce Baard; Matias Westendarp; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Total tubeless ultra-mini supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Sandeep Gupta; Susanta Kumar Das; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07

9.  Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status.

Authors:  Sung Yong Cho; Min Soo Choo; Jae Hyun Jung; Chang Wook Jeong; Sohee Oh; Seung Bae Lee; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal.

Authors:  Madhu Sudan Agrawal; Ketan Agarwal; Tarun Jindal; Manoj Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.