PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to give an overview of the data derived from the CROES PCNL Global Study published previously in 25 articles. METHODS: A comprehensive overview of the outcome of the CROES PCNL Global Study was made, analysed and compared with the current literature and guidelines. RESULTS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was predominately performed in prone position. Although the supine position claims to be favourable over the prone approach, the present study showed a longer operation time and lower stone-free rate (SFR). This might be explained by differences in definition in operation time and methods in the evaluation of residual stones. Ultrasound (US)-guided access proves beneficial in lowering puncture time and radiation exposure. Renal anomalies can safely be treated by PCNL and have similar outcomes to a normal situation. In patients with a solitary kidney, however, there is a lower SFR and more bleeding. Also, severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have less favourable outcome. Morbidity and complications following PCNL are dominated by fever (10.5%) and bleeding (7.8%). A matched control analysis confirmed that antibiotic prophylaxis gives a threefold lower post-operative fever rate. In a multivariate analysis, it was elegantly demonstrated that bleeding was directly related to the size of the dilatation: the larger the bore, the higher the chance for bleeding. Elderly patients are at higher risk of complications and longer hospital stay. Overall, obese patients have similar outcome as the general population; however, super-obese (BMI > 40) patients have a higher chance of more severe complications. For the first time, this database illustrated a significant relationship between results and complications of PCNL, and caseload volume. The optimal case volume per centre appears to be 120 PCNL's/year. Finally, a nomogram has been developed that enables better patient counselling and decision-making. CONCLUSION: The CROES PCNL Global Study is the largest real-life study providing new insights into general and special conditions. Because of the vast number of patients included, rare conditions including renal anomalies, solitary kidneys and patient characteristics like severe CKD, super obesity and old age could be analysed. Besides this information, a nomogram was developed. And for the first time, the influence of caseload volume was established.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to give an overview of the data derived from the CROES PCNL Global Study published previously in 25 articles. METHODS: A comprehensive overview of the outcome of the CROES PCNL Global Study was made, analysed and compared with the current literature and guidelines. RESULTS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was predominately performed in prone position. Although the supine position claims to be favourable over the prone approach, the present study showed a longer operation time and lower stone-free rate (SFR). This might be explained by differences in definition in operation time and methods in the evaluation of residual stones. Ultrasound (US)-guided access proves beneficial in lowering puncture time and radiation exposure. Renal anomalies can safely be treated by PCNL and have similar outcomes to a normal situation. In patients with a solitary kidney, however, there is a lower SFR and more bleeding. Also, severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have less favourable outcome. Morbidity and complications following PCNL are dominated by fever (10.5%) and bleeding (7.8%). A matched control analysis confirmed that antibiotic prophylaxis gives a threefold lower post-operative fever rate. In a multivariate analysis, it was elegantly demonstrated that bleeding was directly related to the size of the dilatation: the larger the bore, the higher the chance for bleeding. Elderly patients are at higher risk of complications and longer hospital stay. Overall, obesepatients have similar outcome as the general population; however, super-obese (BMI > 40) patients have a higher chance of more severe complications. For the first time, this database illustrated a significant relationship between results and complications of PCNL, and caseload volume. The optimal case volume per centre appears to be 120 PCNL's/year. Finally, a nomogram has been developed that enables better patient counselling and decision-making. CONCLUSION: The CROES PCNL Global Study is the largest real-life study providing new insights into general and special conditions. Because of the vast number of patients included, rare conditions including renal anomalies, solitary kidneys and patient characteristics like severe CKD, super obesity and old age could be analysed. Besides this information, a nomogram was developed. And for the first time, the influence of caseload volume was established.
Authors: Gaston Labate; Pranjal Modi; Anthony Timoney; Luigi Cormio; Xiaochun Zhang; Michael Louie; Magnus Grabe; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Marc C Smaldone; Tina Schuster; Stephen V Jackman; Timothy D Averch Journal: J Endourol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Dedan Opondo; Stavros Gravas; Andrian Joyce; Margaret Pearle; Tadashi Matsuda; Ying-Hao Sun; Dean Assimos; John Denstedt; Jean de la Rosette Journal: J Endourol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Wei Xue; Dalibor Pacik; Willem Boellaard; Alberto Breda; Mircea Botoca; Jens Rassweiler; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Jean de la Rosette Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Abbas Basiri; Amir M Ziaee; Hamid R Kianian; Sadrallah Mehrabi; Hormoz Karami; Seyed M Hosseini Moghaddam Journal: J Endourol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Gaston Astroza; Michael Lipkin; Andreas Neisius; Glenn Preminger; Marco De Sio; Hiren Sodha; Christian Saussine; Jean de la Rosette Journal: Urology Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Saeed R Khan; Margaret S Pearle; William G Robertson; Giovanni Gambaro; Benjamin K Canales; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer; Hans-Göran Tiselius Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 52.329