Literature DB >> 26679343

Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of 10-20 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Faruk Ozgor1, Abdulkadir Tepeler2, Fatih Elbir2, Omer Sarilar3, Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz3, Abdullah Armagan2, Murat Binbay3, Ali Ihsan Tasci2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare effectivity and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) for 10-20 mm renal stones in obese patients.
METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, charts of patients who were treated with F-URS or mPNL for 10-20 mm kidney stone(s) were analyzed. Patients with BMI > 30 kg/m(2) were enrolled into the study. Total of 315 patients were treated with mPNL, and 56 patients were matched our inclusion criteria. In the same period, F-URS was performed in 669 patients, and 157 of them had 10-20 mm kidney stones, and their BMI values were >30 kg/m(2). The patients were retrospectively matched at a 1:1 ratio to index F-URS-mPNL cases with respect to the patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI and size, number, and location of stone.
RESULTS: Gender, age, BMI, stone size, stone number, location of stone(s), and ASA scores were similar between groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in mPNL group (p: 0.021). However, the mean fluoroscopy time was similar (p: 0.270). Hemoglobin drop requiring blood transfusion and angioembolization was performed in two and one patients after mPNL, respectively. Overall complication rate was significantly higher in mPNL group than F-URS group (30.3 vs. 5.3 %, p: 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that both F-URS and mPNL achieve acceptable stone-free rates in obese patients with 10-20 mm renal stones. However, complication rates were significantly lower in F-URS group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MiniPNL; Obesity; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; f-URS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26679343     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1745-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  20 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ahmad Aref Al-Dessoukey; Ayman Salah Moussa; Ahmed Mahmoud Abdelbary; Ahmed Zayed; Rabie Abdallah; Ahmad A Elderwy; Amr Medhat Massoud; Aly Hussein Aly
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy bleeding: aetiology and management.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Darshan H Shah; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.

Authors:  Fan Cheng; Weimin Yu; Xiaobin Zhang; Sixing Yang; Yue Xia; Yuan Ruan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Comparative study of the treatment of renal stones with flexible ureterorenoscopy in normal weight, obese, and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Julien Letendre; Claire Bonneau; Sixtina Gil Diez de Medina; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Faruk Ozgor; Mesut Ugurlu; Erdem Tekinarslan; Cem Kezer; Rahmi Aslan; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The impact of body mass index on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery.

Authors:  Turhan Caskurlu; Gokhan Atis; Ozgur Arikan; Eyup Sabri Pelit; Mert Kilic; Cenk Gurbuz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study of the management of small and large renal stones.

Authors:  Mohamed F Abdelhafez; Bastian Amend; Jens Bedke; Stephan Kruck; Udo Nagele; Arnulf Stenzl; David Schilling
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prognostic impact of metabolic syndrome by different definitions in a population with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Richard B Devereux; Marcello Chinali; Lyle G Best; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Helaine E Resnick
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Obesity. An analysis of epidemiological and prognostic research.

Authors:  Jana Krzysztoszek; Ewelina Wierzejska; Alicja Zielińska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.318

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients.

Authors:  He-Qun Chen; Zhi-Yong Chen; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhong-Qing Yang; Cheng He; Yao He
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile.

Authors:  N F Davis; M R Quinlan; C Poyet; N Lawrentschuk; D M Bolton; D Webb; G S Jack
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years.

Authors:  Anngona Ghosh; Rachel Oliver; Carolyn Way; Lucy White; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hongyang Jiang; Zhe Yu; Liping Chen; Tao Wang; Zhuo Liu; Jihong Liu; Shaogang Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Yeda Chen; Yaoan Wen; Qingfeng Yu; Xiaolu Duan; Wenqi Wu; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study.

Authors:  Sunil Bhaskara Pillai; Arun Chawla; Jean de la Rosette; Pilar Laguna; Rajsekhar Guddeti; Suraj Jayadeva Reddy; Ravindra Sabnis; Arvind Ganpule; Mahesh Desai; Aditya Parikh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Rijin Song; Pei Lu; Minjun Jiang; Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.