Literature DB >> 29170856

Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update.

Jens Rassweiler1, Marcel Fiedler2, Nikos Charalampogiannis2, Ahmet Sinan Kabakci3, Remzi Saglam4, Jan-Thorsten Klein5.   

Abstract

The role of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in the management of nephrolithiasis has increased due to the improved armamentarium. However, FURS still represents a challenging technique limiting its diffusion. Similar to previous experiences in laparoscopy, recently developed robotic devices may significantly compensate for the ergonomic deficiencies of FURS. Based on a short description of the history of robotic devices for laparoscopy, this article summarizes all current developments of robotic FURS. In 2008, robotic FURS was first reported using the Sensei-Magellan system designed for interventional cardiology. However, with this device the ureteroscope was only passively manipulated, which represented the main reason why this project has been discontinued after 18 clinical cases. Avicenna Roboflex™ was especially developed for FURS. It consists of a surgeon's console and manipulator of a flexible ureterorenoscope. The console provides an adjustable seat with armrests and two manipulators of the endoscope: the right wheel enables deflection and the left horizontal joystick allows rotation as well as advancing and retracting the instrument. The speed of rotation and advancement can be regulated at the screen of the console. Using the IDEAL system for evaluation of new robotic devices, safety and efficacy of the system could be demonstrated in two multi-centric studies providing significant improved ergonomics for the surgeon (IDEAL stage 1 and 2). Future studies are necessary to determine the final role of robotic FURS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Robotics; Surgical manipulator; Ureterorenoscopy; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29170856     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1024-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  37 in total

1.  Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; G Buess; B Neisius; U Voges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery.

Authors:  J Marescaux; J Leroy; M Gagner; F Rubino; D Mutter; M Vix; S E Butner; M K Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Application of the IDEAL framework to robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Philipp Dahm; Art Sedrakyan; Peter McCulloch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prevalence of orthopedic complaints among endourologists and their compliance with radiation safety measures.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; T Frede; O Seemann; C Stock; L Sentker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Robotic flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Mihir M Desai; Rishi Grover; Monish Aron; Arvind Ganpule; Shriram S Joshi; Mahesh R Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Ureteroscopic skills with and without Roboflex Avicenna in the K-box® simulator.

Authors:  Silvia Proietti; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Salvatore Butticè; Michele Talso; Mohammed Baghdadi; Luca Villa; Steeve Doizi; Guido Giusti; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14

10.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy: Tips and tricks.

Authors:  Bhaskar Kumar Somani; Omar Aboumarzouk; Aneesh Srivastava; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Assistive Electronic Device Solutions for Urology.

Authors:  Kieran Holmes-Martin; Minghui Zhu; Shujun Xiao; Faezeh Arab Hassani
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 2.  [Robots in urology-an analysis of current and future devices].

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; A S Goezen; M C Rassweiler-Seyfried; E Liatsikos; T Bach; J-U Stolzenburg; J Klein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Robotic flexible ureteroscopy: A new challenge in endourology.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Seung Hyun Jeon
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-09

5.  Relationship of endoscopic lesions of the renal papilla with type of renal stone and 24 h urine analysis.

Authors:  X A Sabaté Arroyo; F Grases Freixedas; J L Bauzà Quetglas; J Guimerà Garcia; E Pieras Ayala
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.