Literature DB >> 23875008

Genome survey sequencing and genetic background characterization of Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta) based on next-generation sequencing.

Wei Zhou1, Yiyi Hu, Zhenghong Sui, Feng Fu, Jinguo Wang, Lianpeng Chang, Weihua Guo, Binbin Li.   

Abstract

Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis has a high economic value and is one of the most important aquaculture species in China. Despite it is economic importance, it has remained largely unstudied at the genomic level. In this study, we conducted a genome survey of Gp. lemaneiformis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. In total, 18.70 Gb of high-quality sequence data with an estimated genome size of 97 Mb were obtained by HiSeq 2000 sequencing for Gp. lemaneiformis. These reads were assembled into 160,390 contigs with a N50 length of 3.64 kb, which were further assembled into 125,685 scaffolds with a total length of 81.17 Mb. Genome analysis predicted 3490 genes and a GC% content of 48%. The identified genes have an average transcript length of 1,429 bp, an average coding sequence size of 1,369 bp, 1.36 exons per gene, exon length of 1,008 bp, and intron length of 191 bp. From the initial assembled scaffold, transposable elements constituted 54.64% (44.35 Mb) of the genome, and 7737 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified. Among these SSRs, the trinucleotide repeat type was the most abundant (up to 73.20% of total SSRs), followed by the di- (17.41%), tetra- (5.49%), hexa- (2.90%), and penta- (1.00%) nucleotide repeat type. These characteristics suggest that Gp. lemaneiformis is a model organism for genetic study. This is the first report of genome-wide characterization within this taxon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23875008      PMCID: PMC3713064          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Gracilariopsis was long indistinguishable from the genus Gracilaria in the family Gracilariaceae Nageli (Rhodophyta). In 1989, however, Fredericq and Hommersand [1] reinstated this genus based on four important differences between the two genera. Considered to be one of the most important economic macroalgae, Gp. lemaneiformis Bory is utilized for agar extraction [2], [3]. Its high agar yield accounts for more than half of total annual agar production worldwide [4]. Gp. lemaneiformis is also an ideal material for genetic research [5], and it has a potential role in the inhibition of red tides and in bioremediation [6], [7]. Single-rope floating raft cultivation of Gp. lemaneiformis has been widespread along the coastline of South China since the 1990s [5]. Currently, Gp. lemaneiformis is one of the most important aquaculture species in China [8]. Following the success of the human genome project, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies were launched. Compared with Roche's 454 and ABI's SOLiD, HiSeq 2000 offers the cheapest sequencing and the biggest output [9]. Illumina HiSeq 2000 also has been successfully used to characterize the genetic background of many marine species, including Saccharina japonica [10], Pyropia yezoensis [11], [12], Membranipora grandicella [13], Anguilla japonica [14], Pinctada fucata [15], Pinctada martensii [16] and Pseudomonas stutzeri AN10 [17]. Genetic studies of Gp. lemaneiformis aimed at improving its agar yield and growth rate are relatively new. Recent genetic studies have focused on the mitochondrial genome [18], functional gene cloning [19], analysis of genetic diversity [20], [21], and mutation research [22]. However, genetic studies of Gp. lemaneiformis remain underdeveloped compared with many other aquaculture species, such as S. japonica, P. yezoensis, Cynoglossus semilaevis, and Apostichopus japonicus, which might be due in part to the insufficient genetic or genomic resources available for Gp. lemaneiformis. To investigate and provide a genomic resource for further research (e.g., molecular cloning, structural and functional genomic studies, breeding, and comparative and evolutionary studies) on this species, we conducted a genome survey of Gp. lemaneiformis using NGS technology. The results of this study should be useful for crop improvement programs and better utilization of the existing genomic information in the future.

Materials and Methods

Sample preparation

A healthy female thallus of Gp. lemaneiformis, which was identified based on its morphology at maturity [23], was collected in November 2011 from the intertidal zone of Zhanshan Bay, Qingdao, China (36°02′ N, 120°20′ E). After clearing the specimen in seawater to remove epiphytes, mud, and sand, the thalli were rinsed with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min and treated in antibiotic seawater containing 0.3 g L−1 penicillin, 0.2 g L−1 nystatin, 0.02 g L−1 cefotaxine, 0.1 g L−1 kanamycin, 1.0 g L−1 streptomycin sulphate, and 0.1 g ml−1 GeO2 for about 6 h to remove possible bacterial contaminants and diatoms. Part of a thallus then was used for DNA extraction, and the remaining thalli were cultured continuously in modified Provasoli's medium [24] under the following conditions: temperature of 20°C, photon flux density of 15 µmol m−2s−1, salinity of 30‰, and a 12 h light∶12 h dark photoperiod regime.

DNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangenbiotech, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity and quality of genomic DNA were measured using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and Gene Quant (Amersham Bioscience, San Francisco, USA). Two paired-end libraries with insert sizes of about 170 base pairs (bp) and 500 bp were constructed from fragmented random genomic DNA following the manufacturer's instructions (Illumina, Guangzhou, China). Sequence data generation, using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform was conducted by Beijing Genomics Institute (Shenzhen, China). All sequencing reads were deposited in the Short Read Archive (SRA) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/), which are retrievable under the accession number SRX258772.

Sequence assembly and analysis

The raw HiSeq 2000 reads were first pre-processed by trimming short tips and low quality sequences using a phred-scale quality score cut-off of 20 for the acquisition of Q20 values. Genome assembly was completed with the pre-processed reads using SOAPdenovo software [25]. All usable reads were realigned to the contig sequences, and then the paired-end relationship between reads was aligned between contigs. We constructed the scaffolds step by step using variant insert size paired-ends. Default assembly parameters of >40 bp overlap length and >90% sequence identity were used. The genome size was calculated using the total length of sequence reads and sequencing depth [26].

Analysis of G+C content

We used 10-kb non-overlapping sliding windows along the assembled sequence to calculate GC content and average sequencing depth. The x-axis was GC content percent across every 10-kb window and the y-axis was average sequencing depth, which was determined across every 10-kb window independently.

Identification of repeat sequences

Tandem repeats and interspersed repeats are two main types of repeats in the genome. The program TRF was used to search for tandem repeats. The annotated interspersed repeats were identified using RepeatMasker (version 3.3.0) and RepeatProteinMasker against the Repbase transposable element library (version 16.10). The software programs LTR-FINDER, Piler, and RepeatScout were used to construct a de novo repeat library, and then the software RepeatMasker was run to find homolog repeats in the de novo repeat library [27], [28].

Gene prediction, annotation and comparison

Homology-based and de novo methods were used to predict genes, and the predicted results were integrated by the program GLEAN 17 [29]. Protein sequences from Chondrus crispus, Cyanidioschyzon merolae, Pyropia yezoensis, Arabidopsis thaliana, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella variabilis, and Oryza sativa were mapped to the genome assembly using blastN with an E-value of 1e-5 [30] to perform gene prediction, using one species each time. For de novo prediction, Augustus [31] and Genscan [32] were used to predict genes with parameters trained on A. thaliana. Each predict gene was annotated by blastP to the GenBank database. Functional assignments were mapped onto Gene Ontology (GO) using Blast2GO and then the proportions of GO categories among four red algae species were compared using WEGO (http://wego.genomics.org.cn/cgi-bin/wego/index.pl).

Synteny analysis of the genome

The two reference genomes (C. variabilis and A. thaliana) were downloaded from ftp://ftp.ensemblgenomes.org/pub/release-15/plants/fasta/arabidopsis_thaliana/(A. thaliana) and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/694 (C. variabilis), respectively. We used BLASTP [33] with an E-value threshold of 1e-5 to identify homologous genes between Gp. lemaneiformis and these two reference genomes. The program MCscan (version 8.0) then was used to identify syntenic blocks between the two genomes.

Identification of simple sequence repeats (SSRs)

SSRs were mined in the genome sequence using the SSRIT program with the following parameters: at least six repeats for di- and four repeats for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides for SSRs.

Results and Discussion

Sequencing and de novo short-read assembly

The two small-insert (170 and 500 bp) libraries were sequenced to generate a total of 21.52 Gb raw reads. After filtering and correction of the sequence data, a total of about 18.70 Gb of clean reads were obtained, with a read length of 95 bp and about 113.98X coverage of the estimated 160-Mb genome [34] (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of two paired-end libraries used for HiSeq 2000 Sequencing and paired-end sequencing datasets.

LibrarySex of algaeInsert Size/bpRead Length/bpData/MbSequence Depth/X
L1female500959,087.4953.93
L2female170959,608.6760.05
Total18,696.16113.98
The program SOAPdenovo and the 18.69 Gb clean reads were used to conduct de novo assembly [25] to produce a contig with the N50 of ∼3.64 kb, longest contig length of ∼51.34 kb, and total length of ∼77.54 Mb (Table 2). A sequence with a scaffold N50 length of ∼20 kb, total length of 81.17 Mb, and longest scaffold length of ∼159,75 kb (Table 2) also was generated. Our draft genome assembly had unclosed gaps shorter than 16.3% (∼16 Mb) based on the calculation suggested in Li et al. [35]. In addition, Li et al. [35] reported that most gaps were easy to occur in repetitive regions with high unit identity and lengths larger than the sequencing read length, which usually could not be assembled with the current data.
Table 2

Statistics of the genome assembly.

ContigScaffold
Size(bp)NumberSize(bp)Number
N9012794,86712757,716
N8019338,3895607,482
N7064815,2035,7542,422
N601,6747,52312,9611,511
N503,6384,37920,0071,013
Longest51,340-159,753-
Total size77,537,041-81,167,384-
Total number(≥100 bp)160,390-125,685
Total number(≥2 kb)6649-3,704
As sequencing depth increases, assembly quality also improves. Generally, current NGS assemblers require at least 30X coverage for a successful assembly without gaps from a standard multicell sample [36]. One of the most popular metrics to comparing assemblies is the N50 statistic [37], which is defined as a weighted median and is the smallest contig size in the set whose combined length totals 50% of the genome assembly [38], [39]. The N50 contig size of Gp. lemaneiformis (3.64 kb) in this study was larger than that of Nannochloropis gaditanathose (404 bp) [40] and P. yezoensis (1,669 bp) [11] but lower than those of prokaryotes with an average N50 contig size of 24 kb from de novo assemblies [41] or some terrestrial plants [26], [42], [43]. A large N50 contig and contig number might simply reflect a continuous and complete assembly [41]. However, it would be not valid to compare species using the contig N50 statistics from different assemblies if each N50 statistic was not calculated from the same combined length value [44].

GC content and GC-depth analysis

Generally, genomic sequences generated through NGS are not uniformly distributed across the genome, as they are wider than the Poisson distribution [45]. GC content was one of three factors found to contribute to sequence bias from Illumina's platform [46]. Compared with mid-GC content, high and low GC contents cause reduced coverage in sequencing regions [47], [48]. To measure genome-wide sequencing bias, GC content and average sequencing depth were plotted using non-overlapping 10-kb sliding windows along the assembled sequence. The density points only concentrated in the 40–60% range, with the average GC content of ∼48%. Moreover, Gp. lemaneiformis had a mid-GC content [47], [48], which did not demonstrate abnormality of the species sample (some species themselves have abnormal GC content) or sequencing bias for the present data (Figure 1).
Figure 1

GC content and average sequencing depth of the genome data used for assembly.

(The x-axis was GC content percent across every 10-kb non-overlapping sliding window).

GC content and average sequencing depth of the genome data used for assembly.

(The x-axis was GC content percent across every 10-kb non-overlapping sliding window). The 48% GC content in our study correlated well with values previously reported by Zhang et. al. [23], who found a G+C content of 41.1–49.7% in Gp. lemaneiformis. These values were higher than that of some marine bacteria (32.8–33.2%) including Agarivorans gilvus, Aquimarina agarilytica and Vibrio tubiashii [49]–[51] generated by Illumina paired-end sequencing; similar to values for marine macroalgae, such as Solieria filiformis (48.6%) [52], Chondrus crispus (46.3%) [53], P. purpurea (44.6%) [53], and Laminaria hyperborea (42.6%) [54]; and lower than that of P. yezoensis (63.6%) [11] and Cyanidioschyzon merolae (55.0%) [55].

Estimation of genome size

Based on K-mer analysis, all sequences of about 18.70 Gb (Table 1) were used to estimate the genome size of Gp. lemaneiformis. The peak depth was at 162X, and we estimated the genome size to be 95.96 Mb. Generally, the 30X data are relatively accurate for estimating the size of the genome (based on evaluation experience of the Beijing Genomics Institute), so 3.5 Gb (18.70 Gb *30X/162X) of data were used to count and plot the distribution of 17-mer frequency. The peak depth was at 30X (Figure 2), and the number of 17-mers was 2,910,526,453 (Table 3). Their relationship could be expressed by the algorithm: Genome Size  =  K-mer_num/Peak_depth. The estimated genome size of 97.02 Mb (Table 3) was obtained, which was just one-quarter of the diploid size (375 Mb) for this alga based on average genetic substance content within the cells of Gracilariopsis [23]. The result also was not in accordance with the result of Kapraun and Dutcher [34], who reported a nuclear genome size of 160 Mb (haploid) in Gp. lemaneiformis using microspectrophotometry with the DNA-localizing fluorochrome hydroethidine. The same fluorescence method had been used to evaluate the genome size of Ch. crispus and obtained 150-Mb genome [53], which was about one-third larger than that of the complete genome sequencing method (105 Mb) [56]. We intend to verify the genome size using the flow cytometry method in the future. In total, haploid Gp. lemaneiformis appeared having a fairly small genome size, which would be an advantage for full sequencing of the genome.
Figure 2

Distribution of 17-mer frequency in the 3.5 Gb sequences (3.5 Gb = 18.70 Gb*30X/162X).

Table 3

Estimation of Gp. lemaneiformis based on K-mer statistics.

K-mer valueK-mer numberDepthGenome size (bp)Used basesUsed readsDepth (X)
172,910,526,4533097,017,5483,500,000,16536,842,10736.07

Note: Generally, using 30X data to estimate the size of the genome are preference because of its accuracy (based on evaluation experience of the Beijing Genomics Institute); Used bases were calculated by 18.70 Gb*30X/162X; Genome Size  =  K-mer_num/Peak_depth.

Note: Generally, using 30X data to estimate the size of the genome are preference because of its accuracy (based on evaluation experience of the Beijing Genomics Institute); Used bases were calculated by 18.70 Gb*30X/162X; Genome Size  =  K-mer_num/Peak_depth. Arabidopsis has been documented as a model organism for genetic study, mainly because it has a small genome (120 Mb genome) that is amenable to detailed molecular analysis [57], [58]. In marine macroalgae, Pyropia was suggested as a model organism for genetic studies, partly because its haploid has a relatively small genome size (diploid: 270–530 Mb) [12]. The estimated genome size of Gp. lemaneiformis (97.02 Mb) is similar to that of A. thaliana and Ch. crispus but much smaller than that of Pyropia, which shows the potential of Gp. lemaneiformis as a model species in this regard. Additionally, Gracilariopsis species reproduce both sexually and asexually and have a typical Polysiphonia-type life history that is completed in the laboratory within 6 months. These features make Gp. lemaneiformis a good model for studying genetics and genomics. It might also prove to be a model organism for common analyses of algal genetics and molecular biology.

Repetitive sequences

Combined results from RepeatMasker and RepeatProteinMasker analyses revealed that transposable elements (TEs) constituted 54.64% (44.35 Mb) of the genome, and nearly one-third (20.46% of the genome) of them could not be classified within the TE regime (Table 4). Classification of the known TEs revealed that the majority of repeats were long-terminal repeat elements (LTRs) (26.40%), whereas 8.56% of the TEs were DNA transposons (Table 4).
Table 4

Percentage of the genome masked as each class of transposable elements.

TypeRepbase TEsTE protiensDe novoCombined TEs
Length (bp)% in genomeLength (bp)% in genomeLength (bp)% in genomeLength (bp)% in genome
DNA228,5290.282,138,5572.636,682,1338.236,950,9588.56
LINE63,6560.08117,2080.141,210,9551.491,342,2611.65
LTR2,255,1612.787,687,6089.4720,671,30425.4721,425,83726.40
SINE3,1530.00400.0000.003,1530.004
Other630.0000.0000.00630.00
Unknown00.0000.0016,608,82620.4616,608,82620.46
Total2,535,5133.129,941,90812.2543,807,75053.9744,351,91454.64

Note: RepBase TEs and TE proteins were obtained, using RepeatMasker and RepeatProteinMask respectively, based on the RepBase library; De novo repeat prediction identified repetitive DNA using RepeatMasker against the de novo repeat library of Gp. lemaneiformis, which was constructed by the programs LTR-FINDER, Piler and RepeatScout; Combined TEs were the integration and filtering redundancies of the above three methods.

Note: RepBase TEs and TE proteins were obtained, using RepeatMasker and RepeatProteinMask respectively, based on the RepBase library; De novo repeat prediction identified repetitive DNA using RepeatMasker against the de novo repeat library of Gp. lemaneiformis, which was constructed by the programs LTR-FINDER, Piler and RepeatScout; Combined TEs were the integration and filtering redundancies of the above three methods. The fraction of TEs in the Gp. lemaneiformis genome was similar to that of the pigeonpea (51.67%) [26]; higher than that of Theobroma cacao (24%) [59], rice (35%) [60], and animals such as Cynoglossus semilaevi (5.23%) [61], Chlamys farreri (15.84%) [62], and catfish (11.91%) [63]; and far lower than that of maize (85%) [64]. Repetitive sequences, especially TEs, are known to be prominent evolutionary factors that played a significant role in plant gene structure and genome evolution by enhancing genome plasticity, such as transposition, excision, insertion, chromosome breakage, and chromosome rearrangements [65]–[68]. In prokaryotes, DNA TEs are the major class of transposable DNAs, and RNA TEs are particularly abundant in eukaryotes [65]. Repeated sequences constituted 73% of the Ch. crispus genome, ∼55% (representing 58 Mb) of which were LTR retrotransposons [56]. As in Ch. crispus and some higher plants such as maize [69] and Ricinus communis [70], the most abundant retrotransposons in Gp. lemaneiformis are LTRs, which might be associated with potential horizontal transfer, insertional mutations, and heterochromatin near centromeres [71], [72]. Both homology-based and de novo gene prediction methods were used to predict the number of genes in the Gp. lemaneiformis genome (Table 5). First, Genscan and Augustus predicted 3369 and 3363 gene loci, respectively. Next, four homologous genome sequences were mapped to the genome assembly. Predicted genes 1,858–4,393 were obtained with an average transcript length of 787.06–910.23 bp. Subsequently, all data were integrated using GLEAN 17, and 3,490 genes were identified with an average transcript length of 1,429 bp, average coding sequence size of 1,369 bp, 1.36 exons per gene, exon length of 1,008 bp, and intron length of 191 bp.
Table 5

General statistics of gene prediction for Gp. lemaneiformis.

MethodGene setNumberAverage transcript length (bp)Average CDS length (bp)Average exon per geneAverage exon length (bp)Average intron length (bp)
De novoAugustus3369631.62558.011.35413.99211.59
Genscan33632330.661688.732.68631.02382.97
Homolog Cy. merolae 1860766.51699.301.37510.34181.52
Ch. Crispus 1858773.80702.591.36515.61196.36
P. yezoensis 1878764.10696.321.37509.31184.59
A. thaliana 4222879.14843.621.32638.08110.27
C.reinhardtii 4039808.82746.461.27586.79229.19
O. sativa 4393910.23802.411.34597.55314.52
C. variabilis 3851787.06746.581.28583.54144.88
GLEAN34901429.571369.791.361008.36191.13

Note: Gene length included the exon and intron regions but excluded UTRs.

Note: Gene length included the exon and intron regions but excluded UTRs. The number of predicted genes in the genome of Gp. lemaneiformis was comparable to that of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cy. merolae,(5331) [55] but the number was much lower than that of other sequenced genomes such as Arthrospira platensis (6153) [73], Nannochloropis gaditana (9052) [40], Ch. crispus (9606) [56], Ascaris suum (18,542) [74], and Cucumis sativus (26,682) [75]. Possible reasons for these differences include insufficient sequence depth coverage, variable regulation of gene expression levels (such as an enormous wealth of alternative splicing), and low sequence homology because of shorting of gene information from closely related species. In comparison with other red algae (Table 6), Gp. lemaneiformis genome showed similar genome characteristics, such as average CDS length, short exon/intron length (bp) and low number of exons per gene. Especially, the genes of Gp. lemaneiformis also had few introns and nearly three quarters of predicted genes are monoexonic, resulting in a low average number of introns per gene (0.36). The high proportion of monoexonic genes for Gp. lemaneiformis, which was comparable to those of other red algae, further verified Collén et al.'s conclusion that a low number of introns were a typical characteristic in red algal genomes [56].
Table 6

Comparison of general genome characteristics from four red algae.

Species Gp. lemaneiformis Ch. crispus Cy. merolae P. yezoensis
Average CDS length (bp)1370-15521247
Average exon length (bp)10087891540755
Average intron length (bp)191123248300
Introns per gene0.360.320.0050.7
Exons per gene1.361.321.0051.7
Intron-containing genes (%)28120.6∼40
Of the 3,490 predicted genes in the Gp. lemaneiformis genome, 2,954 genes matched known genes in GenBank and 15.35% (536) were unknown. 2,430 genes could be assigned to one or more ontologies. Totally, 34.57% genes were grouped under biological processes 32.26% genes under cellular components, 33.17% genes under molecular functions. Furthermore, cellular process (27.86%) was the most highly represented groups under the biological process category, followed by macromolecule metabolism (19.17%); for the cellular component, intracellular (28.19%) and cytoplasm (21.56%) part were the significantly represented groups; a relatively high proportion of genes (25.43%) were involved in catalytic activity. The predicted proteins were compared with the 10,327 proteins from P. yezoensis [11], 9,606 proteins from Ch. crispus [56] and.5,331 proteins from Cy. merolae [55]. As shown in Figure 3, the vast proportion of GO categories did not show significant differences among 4 red algae except those related behavior process, electron transport process and extracellular component, which hinted that the biological processes of the above among 4 red algae were different.
Figure 3

GO category comparison among Gp. lemaneiformis, P. yezoensis, Cy. merolae and Ch. crispus.

Synteny with sequenced plant genomes

We compared about 81.17 Mb of the genomic sequence from Gp. lemaneiformis with the A. thaliana and C. variabilis genomes using the program LASTZ, and then MCscan was used to identify syntenic blocks. The genomic sequence of Gp. lemaneiformis showed minimal matching to A. thaliana (match length of 900,618 bp with only 1.11% coverage) and C. variabilis (match length of 345,067 bp with only 0.43% coverage),and the minimal matching could not be used to evaluate the general features of synteny relationships (Tables 7 and 8). Although it should be possible to analyze the evolutionary history between two species using complete genomic sequences [76], the following factors would make the process difficult or impossible: short sequence length of initial assembly, low gene distribution, and species specificity.
Table 7

Summary of match sequence between Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis and Arabidopsis thalianai.

SpeciesMatch length (bp)Total length (bp)Coverage (%)
A. thaliana 1,671,544119,146,3481.40
Gp. lemaneiformis 900,61881,167,3841.11
Table 8

Summary of match sequence between Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis and Chlorella variabili.

SpeciesMatch length (bp)Total length (bp)Coverage (%)
C. variabilis 762,23246,159,5121.65
Gp. lemaneiformis 345,06781,167,3840.43

SSR detection

In this study, we found 7737 derived SSRs, none of which were mononucleotide repeats and complex SSR type. Among these SSRs, the trinucleotide repeat type was the most abundant (up to 73.20% of total SSRs), followed by di- (17.41%), tetra- (5.49%), hexa- (2.90%), and penta- (1.00%) nucleotide repeat types (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Frequency of SSR types in the Genome Survey of Gp. lemaneiformis.

In addition, 315 motif types were identified, which consisted of di- (8), tri- (30), tetra- (68), penta- (56), and hexa- (153) nucleotide types. Table S1 shows the SSR frequency of each motif. Statistical analysis revealed that the motif AG/CT was the most abundant among the dinucleotide repeat motifs, accounting for 24.72%, followed by TG/CA at 20.86% (Figure 5). The most prominent dinucleotide motif of Gp. lemaneiformis was the same as that of the rubber tree, in which the AG/CT motif was also most abundant [41]. In embryophytes, yeast, and fungi, however, the AT/AT motif is most abundant [77]. Within the trinucleotide repeat motifs, the common motifs TGC/GCA and CAG/CTG accounted for 14.42% and 14.05%, respectively, in Gp. lemaneiformis (Figure 6).
Figure 5

Percentage of different motifs in dinucleotide repeats in Gp. lemaneiformis.

Figure 6

Percentage of different motifs in trinucleotide repeats in Gp. lemaneiformis.

In the Gp. lemaneiformis genome, the trinucleotide repeat type was predominant, as is also the case in other species such as P. yezoensis, A. thaliana, rice, maize, and tomato [12]. Yang et. al. [12] reported that the trinucleotide repeat type in the coding regions would enhance gene variation but not cause frameshift mutation. SSRs are inherently unstable, which creates and maintains quantitative genetic variation, so they must have played an important role in genome evolution [77]. It is possible that the 7737 derived SSR loci found in our study may be used as SSR markers for genetic mapping in the short term. Occurrence of SSR motifs in Genome Survey to . (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  58 in total

Review 1.  Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes:m microcolinearity and its many exceptions.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Beware of mis-assembled genomes.

Authors:  Steven L Salzberg; James A Yorke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Agarivorans gilvus sp. nov. isolated from seaweed.

Authors:  Zong-Jun Du; Guo-Qiang Lv; Alejandro P Rooney; Ting-Ting Miao; Qing-Qiang Xu; Guan-Jun Chen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Ascaris suum draft genome.

Authors:  Aaron R Jex; Shiping Liu; Bo Li; Neil D Young; Ross S Hall; Yingrui Li; Linfeng Yang; Na Zeng; Xun Xu; Zijun Xiong; Fangyuan Chen; Xuan Wu; Guojie Zhang; Xiaodong Fang; Yi Kang; Garry A Anderson; Todd W Harris; Bronwyn E Campbell; Johnny Vlaminck; Tao Wang; Cinzia Cantacessi; Erich M Schwarz; Shoba Ranganathan; Peter Geldhof; Peter Nejsum; Paul W Sternberg; Huanming Yang; Jun Wang; Jian Wang; Robin B Gasser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Wei Fan; Geng Tian; Hongmei Zhu; Lin He; Jing Cai; Quanfei Huang; Qingle Cai; Bo Li; Yinqi Bai; Zhihe Zhang; Yaping Zhang; Wen Wang; Jun Li; Fuwen Wei; Heng Li; Min Jian; Jianwen Li; Zhaolei Zhang; Rasmus Nielsen; Dawei Li; Wanjun Gu; Zhentao Yang; Zhaoling Xuan; Oliver A Ryder; Frederick Chi-Ching Leung; Yan Zhou; Jianjun Cao; Xiao Sun; Yonggui Fu; Xiaodong Fang; Xiaosen Guo; Bo Wang; Rong Hou; Fujun Shen; Bo Mu; Peixiang Ni; Runmao Lin; Wubin Qian; Guodong Wang; Chang Yu; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Zhigang Wu; Huiqing Liang; Jiumeng Min; Qi Wu; Shifeng Cheng; Jue Ruan; Mingwei Wang; Zhongbin Shi; Ming Wen; Binghang Liu; Xiaoli Ren; Huisong Zheng; Dong Dong; Kathleen Cook; Gao Shan; Hao Zhang; Carolin Kosiol; Xueying Xie; Zuhong Lu; Hancheng Zheng; Yingrui Li; Cynthia C Steiner; Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam; Siyuan Lin; Qinghui Zhang; Guoqing Li; Jing Tian; Timing Gong; Hongde Liu; Dejin Zhang; Lin Fang; Chen Ye; Juanbin Zhang; Wenbo Hu; Anlong Xu; Yuanyuan Ren; Guojie Zhang; Michael W Bruford; Qibin Li; Lijia Ma; Yiran Guo; Na An; Yujie Hu; Yang Zheng; Yongyong Shi; Zhiqiang Li; Qing Liu; Yanling Chen; Jing Zhao; Ning Qu; Shancen Zhao; Feng Tian; Xiaoling Wang; Haiyin Wang; Lizhi Xu; Xiao Liu; Tomas Vinar; Yajun Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shiping Liu; Hemin Zhang; Desheng Li; Yan Huang; Xia Wang; Guohua Yang; Zhi Jiang; Junyi Wang; Nan Qin; Li Li; Jingxiang Li; Lars Bolund; Karsten Kristiansen; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Maynard Olson; Xiuqing Zhang; Songgang Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The regulated retrotransposon transcriptome of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Faulkner; Yasumasa Kimura; Carsten O Daub; Shivangi Wani; Charles Plessy; Katharine M Irvine; Kate Schroder; Nicole Cloonan; Anita L Steptoe; Timo Lassmann; Kazunori Waki; Nadine Hornig; Takahiro Arakawa; Hazuki Takahashi; Jun Kawai; Alistair R R Forrest; Harukazu Suzuki; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; David A Hume; Valerio Orlando; Sean M Grimmond; Piero Carninci
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Molecular cloning and characterization of class I NF-κB transcription factor from pearl oyster (Pinctada fucata).

Authors:  Xian-De Huang; Wen-Guang Liu; Yun-Yan Guan; Yu Shi; Qi Wang; Mi Zhao; Shan-Zeng Wu; Mao-Xian He
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.581

9.  Permanent draft genome sequence of Vibrio tubiashii strain NCIMB 1337 (ATCC19106).

Authors:  Ben Temperton; Simon Thomas; Karen Tait; Helen Parry; Matt Emery; Mike Allen; John Quinn; John Macgrath; Jack Gilbert
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-04-29

10.  Draft genome sequence and genetic transformation of the oleaginous alga Nannochloropis gaditana.

Authors:  Randor Radakovits; Robert E Jinkerson; Susan I Fuerstenberg; Hongseok Tae; Robert E Settlage; Jeffrey L Boore; Matthew C Posewitz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  19 in total

1.  Genome survey sequencing and genetic diversity of cultivated Akebia trifoliata assessed via phenotypes and SSR markers.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Jiawen Zhang; Qing Yang; Bin Li; Wen Zhou; Zhezhi Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Genome survey of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus to identify genomic information, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, and mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Guiyun Huang; Jianmeng Cao; Chen Chen; Miao Wang; Zhigang Liu; Fengying Gao; Mengmeng Yi; Gang Chen; Maixin Lu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Rapid and Synchronous Breeding of Cytoplasmic Male Sterile and Maintainer Line Through Mitochondrial DNA Rearrangement Using Doubled Haploid Inducer in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Haoran Shi; Ying Zhou; Xingyu Liang; Xuan Luo; Chaowen Xiao; Yun Li; Peizhou Xu; Jisheng Wang; Wanzhuo Gong; Qiong Zou; Lanrong Tao; Zeming Kang; Rong Tang; Zhuang Li; Jin Yang; Shaohong Fu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Genome survey of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) by next generation sequencing: Development of novel SSR markers and genetic diversity in Pistacia species.

Authors:  Elmira Ziya Motalebipour; Salih Kafkas; Mortaza Khodaeiaminjan; Nergiz Çoban; Hatice Gözel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Genomic analyses of unique carbohydrate and phytohormone metabolism in the macroalga Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta).

Authors:  Xue Sun; Jun Wu; Guangce Wang; Yani Kang; Hong Sain Ooi; Tingting Shen; Fangjun Wang; Rui Yang; Nianjun Xu; Xiaodong Zhao
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Genome survey of Zanthoxylum bungeanum and development of genomic-SSR markers in congeneric species.

Authors:  Jingmiao Li; Siqiao Li; Lijuan Kong; Lihua Wang; Anzhi Wei; Yulin Liu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Genome survey sequencing for the characterization of genetic background of Dracaena cambodiana and its defense response during dragon's blood formation.

Authors:  Xupo Ding; Wenli Mei; Shengzhuo Huang; Hui Wang; Jiahong Zhu; Wei Hu; Zehong Ding; Weiwei Tie; Shiqing Peng; Haofu Dai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genomic survey sequencing for development and validation of single-locus SSR markers in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

Authors:  Xiaojing Zhou; Yang Dong; Jiaojiao Zhao; Li Huang; Xiaoping Ren; Yuning Chen; Shunmou Huang; Boshou Liao; Yong Lei; Liying Yan; Huifang Jiang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genome Survey Sequencing for the Characterization of the Genetic Background of Rosa roxburghii Tratt and Leaf Ascorbate Metabolism Genes.

Authors:  Min Lu; Huaming An; Liangliang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genome Survey Sequencing of Luffa Cylindrica L. and Microsatellite High Resolution Melting (SSR-HRM) Analysis for Genetic Relationship of Luffa Genotypes.

Authors:  Jianyu An; Mengqi Yin; Qin Zhang; Dongting Gong; Xiaowen Jia; Yajing Guan; Jin Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.