| Literature DB >> 29801464 |
Xue Sun1, Jun Wu2, Guangce Wang3, Yani Kang1,2, Hong Sain Ooi4, Tingting Shen2, Fangjun Wang1, Rui Yang1, Nianjun Xu5, Xiaodong Zhao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red algae are economically valuable for food and in industry. However, their genomic information is limited, and the genomic data of only a few species of red algae have been sequenced and deposited recently. In this study, we annotated a draft genome of the macroalga Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta).Entities:
Keywords: Carbohydrate metabolism; Genomic analysis; Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis; Phytohormone signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29801464 PMCID: PMC5970526 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1309-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Summary of the Gp. lemaneiformis genome assembly
| Contigs | Scaffolds | |
|---|---|---|
| N50 (bp) | 28,502 | 30,590 |
| Longest (bp) | 525,375 | 525,375 |
| Total number | 62,208 | 48,035 |
| Total size (Mb) | 92.58 | 94.60 |
| Total number (≥500 bp) | – | 13,825 |
| Total size (Mb) (≥500 bp) | – | 88.98 |
Fig. 1Circular diagram depicting the genomic features of the top 20 longest contigs. The outer ring represents the top 20 longest contigs, and the black blocks represent the predicted genes. The middle ring shows the GC content of the corresponding contigs in 1 kb bins. The inner rings show expression of the predicted genes. The blue color indicates low expression, and the red color indicates high expression. The links in the plot represent similarity between the contigs
Fig. 2Repetitive element distribution in the Gp. lemaneiformis genome. LINEs, long interspersed repeated DNA elements. LTR, long terminal repeat; RC/Helitron, rolling-circle transposon
Fig. 3Comparative genomic analysis of Gp. lemaneiformis. a The phylogenetic tree was generated using the maximum likelihood method based on single-copy genes shared between algal and plant genomes. b The Venn diagram represents the Gp. lemaneiformis genes shared in the C. crispus, C. merolae and G. sulphuraria genomes. c Gene models of Gp. lemaneiformis are compared with the characterized genomes in the non-redundant protein database using BLASTp. The number of organisms with the top BLASTp hits against Gp. lemaneiformis is indicated
Fig. 4GO and KEGG analyses of the Gp. lemaneiformis genome. a GO terms derived from the Gp. lemaneiformis gene models. b KEGG pathway lists for Gp. lemaneiformis
Fig. 5Analysis of genes potentially involved in agar biosynthesis. Gene homologs in the agar biosynthetic pathways in Gp. lemaneiformis compared with those in C. merolae, N. gaditana, E. siliculosus, C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum. The colored squares denote the number of homologous genes in each species. The step numbers and their representative enzymes are 1. phosphoglucose isomerase; 2. phosphoglucomutase; 3. UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase; 4. galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase; 5. UDP galactosyltransferase; 6. phosphomannose isomerase; 7. phosphomannomutase; 8. GTP-mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase; 9. GDP-mannose-3,5-epimerase; 10. GDP galactosyltransferase; 11. UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; 12. GDP-mannose-3,5-epimerase (the same as 9)