Literature DB >> 23872895

Leachates from solid wastes: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between leachates obtained from fresh and stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Claudete G Chiochetta1, Luís C Goetten, Sônia M Almeida, Gaetana Quaranta, Sylvie Cotelle, Claudemir M Radetski.   

Abstract

The chemical and ecotoxicological characteristics of fresh and stabilized industrial organic sludge leachates were compared to obtain information regarding how the stabilization process can influence the ecotoxic potential of this industrial waste, which could be used for the amendment of degraded soil. Physicochemical analysis of the sludge leachates, as well as a battery of eco(geno)toxicity tests on bacteria, algae, daphnids, and higher plants (including Vicia faba genotoxicity test) and the determination of hydrolytic enzyme activity, was performed according to standard methods. The chemical comparison of the two types of leachate showed that the samples obtained from stabilized sludge had a lower organic content and higher metal content than leachates of the fresh sludge. The eco(geno)toxicological results obtained with aquatic organisms showed that the stabilized sludge leachate was more toxic than the fresh sludge leachate, both originating from the same industrial organic sludge sample. Nevertheless, phytotoxicity tests carried out with a reference peat soil irrigated with stabilized sludge leachate showed the same toxicity as the fresh sludge leachate. In the case of the industrial solid organic sludge studied, stabilization through a biodegradation process promoted a higher metal mobility/bioavailability/eco(geno)toxicity in the stabilized sludge leachate compared to the fresh sludge leachate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872895     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1979-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  21 in total

1.  The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils.

Authors:  C A van Gestel; J J van der Waarde; J G Derksen; E E van der Hoek; M F Veul; S Bouwens; B Rusch; R Kronenburg; G N Stokman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field.

Authors:  Jaco Vangronsveld; Rolf Herzig; Nele Weyens; Jana Boulet; Kristin Adriaensen; Ann Ruttens; Theo Thewys; Andon Vassilev; Erik Meers; Erika Nehnevajova; Daniel van der Lelie; Michel Mench
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental impact of industrial sludge stabilization/solidification products: chemical or ecotoxicological hazard evaluation?

Authors:  Marcos A R Silva; Renan C Testolin; Alcione P Godinho-Castro; Albertina X R Corrêa; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  An assessment of the genotoxic effects of landfill leachates using bacterial and plant tests.

Authors:  J Kwasniewska; G Nałęcz-Jawecki; A Skrzypczak; G A Płaza; M Matejczyk
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Marilice R Radetski; Albertina X R Corrêa; Vinícius Tischer; Erasmo N Tiepo; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Environmental hazard assessment of coal fly ashes using leaching and ecotoxicity tests.

Authors:  V Tsiridis; M Petala; P Samaras; A Kungolos; G P Sakellaropoulos
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Textile sludge application to non-productive soil: physico-chemical and phytotoxicity aspects.

Authors:  Edson V C Rosa; Luciana Mater; Maria M Souza-Sierra; Leonardo R Rörig; Luciane M Vieira; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Low metal bioavailability in a contaminated urban site.

Authors:  Ying Ge; Patricia Murray; Sébastien Sauvé; William Hendershot
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Synergistic and antagonistic effects on genotoxicity of chemicals commonly found in hazardous waste sites.

Authors:  T H Ma; S S Sandhu; Y Peng; T D Chen; T W Kim
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Selecting a battery of bioassays for ecotoxicological characterization of wastes.

Authors:  Pascal Pandard; James Devillers; Anne-Marie Charissou; Véronique Poulsen; Marie-José Jourdain; Jean-François Férard; Cécile Grand; Antonio Bispo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of phytoproductivity data in the choice of native plant species to restore a degraded coal mining site amended with a stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Hela Toumi; Renata F S Böhm; Fernanda Engel; Gabriel Poyer-Radetski; Leonardo R Rörig; Fabrizio Adani; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Contaminant bioavailability in soil and phytotoxicity/genotoxicity tests in Vicia faba L.: a case study of boron contamination.

Authors:  Meri Barbafieri; Lucia Giorgetti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effects of long exposure to spent potliner on seeds, root tips, and meristematic cells of Allium cepa L.

Authors:  Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira; Marcel José Palmieri; Lisete Chamma Davide
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Use of agro-industrial organic sludge amendment to remediate degraded soil: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between fresh and stabilized sludge and establishment of application rates.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Sylvie Cotelle; Jean-François Masfaraud; Hela Toumi; Gaetana Quaranta; Fabrizio Adani; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.