Literature DB >> 19557448

Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field.

Jaco Vangronsveld1, Rolf Herzig, Nele Weyens, Jana Boulet, Kristin Adriaensen, Ann Ruttens, Theo Thewys, Andon Vassilev, Erik Meers, Erika Nehnevajova, Daniel van der Lelie, Michel Mench.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: The use of plants and associated microorganisms to remove, contain, inactivate, or degrade harmful environmental contaminants (generally termed phytoremediation) and to revitalize contaminated sites is gaining more and more attention. In this review, prerequisites for a successful remediation will be discussed. The performance of phytoremediation as an environmental remediation technology indeed depends on several factors including the extent of soil contamination, the availability and accessibility of contaminants for rhizosphere microorganisms and uptake into roots (bioavailability), and the ability of the plant and its associated microorganisms to intercept, absorb, accumulate, and/or degrade the contaminants. The main aim is to provide an overview of existing field experience in Europe concerning the use of plants and their associated microorganisms whether or not combined with amendments for the revitalization or remediation of contaminated soils and undeep groundwater. Contaminations with trace elements (except radionuclides) and organics will be considered. Because remediation with transgenic organisms is largely untested in the field, this topic is not covered in this review. Brief attention will be paid to the economical aspects, use, and processing of the biomass. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: It is clear that in spite of a growing public and commercial interest and the success of several pilot studies and field scale applications more fundamental research still is needed to better exploit the metabolic diversity of the plants themselves, but also to better understand the complex interactions between contaminants, soil, plant roots, and microorganisms (bacteria and mycorrhiza) in the rhizosphere. Further, more data are still needed to quantify the underlying economics, as a support for public acceptance and last but not least to convince policy makers and stakeholders (who are not very familiar with such techniques).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19557448     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  71 in total

1.  Strategies for sustainable woodland on contaminated soils.

Authors:  N M Dickinson
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  The use of transgenic plants in the bioremediation of soils contaminated with trace elements.

Authors:  U Krämer; A N Chardonnens
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  PHYTOREMEDIATION.

Authors:  D. E. Salt; R. D. Smith; I. Raskin
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-06

Review 4.  Endophytic bacteria and their potential application to improve the phytoremediation of contaminated environments.

Authors:  Chiara Mastretta; Tanja Barac; Jaco Vangronsveld; Lee Newman; Safiyh Taghavi; Daniel Van der Lelie
Journal:  Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Performance of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoextraction applied to metal contaminated soils: a review.

Authors:  Thierry Lebeau; Armelle Braud; Karine Jézéquel
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  PHYTOREMEDIATION OF INORGANICS: REALISM AND SYNERGIES.

Authors:  Nicholas M Dickinson; Alan J M Baker; Augustine Doronila; Scott Laidlaw; Roger D Reeves
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.212

7.  Immobilization of nickel and other metals in contaminated sediments by hydroxyapatite addition.

Authors:  J C Seaman; J S Arey; P M Bertsch
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  Use of diammonium phosphate to reduce heavy metal solubility and transport in smelter-contaminated soil.

Authors:  S L McGowen; N T Basta; G O Brown
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Bioremediation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene under field conditions.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dillewijn; Antonio Caballero; José A Paz; M Mar Gonzalez-Pérez; José M Oliva; Juan L Ramos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Phytoextraction with Brassica napus L.: a tool for sustainable management of heavy metal contaminated soils.

Authors:  Veerle M J Grispen; Hans J M Nelissen; Jos A C Verkleij
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  91 in total

1.  Cadmium tolerance in six poplar species.

Authors:  Jiali He; Chaofeng Ma; Yonglu Ma; Hong Li; Jingquan Kang; Tongxian Liu; Andrea Polle; Changhui Peng; Zhi-Bin Luo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Ex situ evaluation of the effects of biochars on environmental and toxicological availabilities of metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Adeline Janus; Christophe Waterlot; Francis Douay; Aurélie Pelfrêne
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Phytoextraction of metals by Erigeron canadensis L. from fly ash landfill of power plant "Kolubara".

Authors:  Rada Krgović; Jelena Trifković; Dušanka Milojković-Opsenica; Dragan Manojlović; Marijana Marković; Jelena Mutić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Phytoremediation of urban soils contaminated with trace metals using Noccaea caerulescens: comparing non-metallicolous populations to the metallicolous 'Ganges' in field trials.

Authors:  Arnaud Jacobs; Thomas Drouet; Thibault Sterckeman; Nausicaa Noret
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  First high-quality draft genome of Ochrobactrum haematophilum P6BS-III, a highly glyphosate-tolerant strain isolated from agricultural soil in Argentina.

Authors:  Francisco Massot; Panagiotis Gkorezis; Breanne McAmmond; Jan d'Haen; Jonathan Van Hamme; Luciano J Merini; Jaco Vangronsveld; Sofie Thijs
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Agrostis capillaris grown on amended mine tailing substrate at pot, lysimeter, and field plot scales.

Authors:  Aurora Neagoe; Paula Stancu; Andrei Nicoară; Marilena Onete; Florian Bodescu; Roxana Gheorghe; Virgil Iordache
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Leachates from solid wastes: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between leachates obtained from fresh and stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Luís C Goetten; Sônia M Almeida; Gaetana Quaranta; Sylvie Cotelle; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Soil biological attributes in arsenic-contaminated gold mining sites after revegetation.

Authors:  Jessé Valentim Dos Santos; Wesley de Melo Rangel; Amanda Azarias Guimarães; Paula Marcela Duque Jaramillo; Márcia Rufini; Leandro Marciano Marra; Maryeimy Varón López; Michele Aparecida Pereira da Silva; Cláudio Roberto Fonsêca Sousa Soares; Fatima Maria de Souza Moreira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Use of radiometric indices to evaluate Zn and Pb stress in two grass species (Festuca rubra L. and Vulpia myuros L.).

Authors:  J Gómez; F Yunta; E Esteban; R O Carpena; P Zornoza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Cadmium in soils and groundwater: A review.

Authors:  Andreas Kubier; Richard T Wilkin; Thomas Pichler
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.