Literature DB >> 16545863

Selecting a battery of bioassays for ecotoxicological characterization of wastes.

Pascal Pandard1, James Devillers, Anne-Marie Charissou, Véronique Poulsen, Marie-José Jourdain, Jean-François Férard, Cécile Grand, Antonio Bispo.   

Abstract

This study was conducted in France within the context of waste classification (Hazardous Waste Council Directive 91/689/EEC), and focused on "ecotoxic" property (H14). In 1998, an experimental test strategy was developed to assess ecotoxicological properties of wastes using a battery of six standardized bioassays. This combined direct and indirect approaches integrating two solid-phase tests: emergence and growth inhibition of Lactuca sativa (14 days), mortality of Eisenia fetida (14 days) and four standardized tests performed on water extracts from wastes: growth inhibition of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (3 days), inhibition of mobility of Daphnia magna (48 h), inhibition of reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia (7 days), inhibition of light emission of Vibrio fischeri (30 min). This study aimed to set up preliminary conclusions on relevancy of this experimental test strategy, based on data obtained since 1998. Results were analyzed from the combined use of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, Principal Component Analysis and Nonlinear Mapping. These multivariate analyses clearly showed that it was possible to reduce this number of tests without changing the typology of the wastes. A battery of bioassays including one solid phase test and two tests performed on water extracts (L. sativa, V. fischeri and C. dubia) was found as an optimal solution for characterizing the toxicity of the studied wastes. This optimal battery represents a good basis for determining the H14 property.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545863     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of ecological risks linked to the discharge of saline industrial effluent into a river.

Authors:  Yves Perrodin; Laurence Volatier; Christine Bazin; Jean-Claude Boisson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Leachates from solid wastes: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between leachates obtained from fresh and stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Luís C Goetten; Sônia M Almeida; Gaetana Quaranta; Sylvie Cotelle; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Rapid in situ toxicity testing with luminescent bacteria Photorhabdus luminescens and Vibrio fischeri adapted to a small portable luminometer.

Authors:  Petr Masner; Barbora Javůrková; Luděk Bláha
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Towards a multi-bioassay-based index for toxicity assessment of fluvial waters.

Authors:  Lalit K Pandey; Isabelle Lavoie; Soizic Morin; Stephen Depuydt; Jie Lyu; Hojun Lee; Jinho Jung; Dong-Hyuk Yeom; Taejun Han; Jihae Park
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Marilice R Radetski; Albertina X R Corrêa; Vinícius Tischer; Erasmo N Tiepo; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of foundry sands and cosmetic sludges using new earthworm biomarkers.

Authors:  Silvana Patricia Curieses; María Elena Sáenz; Marcelo Larramendy; Walter Di Marzio
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Remediation by chemical reduction in laboratory mesocosms of three chlordecone-contaminated tropical soils.

Authors:  Christophe Mouvet; Marie-Christine Dictor; Sébastien Bristeau; Dominique Breeze; Anne Mercier
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Nanoparticles: An Experimental Study of Zinc Nanoparticles Toxicity on Marine Crustaceans. General Overview on the Health Implications in Humans.

Authors:  Luigi Vimercati; Domenica Cavone; Antonio Caputi; Luigi De Maria; Michele Tria; Ermelinda Prato; Giovanni Maria Ferri
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21

9.  Evaluation of ecotoxicological risks related to the Discharge of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in a periurban River.

Authors:  Ruth Angerville; Yves Perrodin; Christine Bazin; Evens Emmanuel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Ecological Risk Assessment of a Metal-Contaminated Area in the Tropics. Tier II: Detailed Assessment.

Authors:  Júlia Carina Niemeyer; Matilde Moreira-Santos; Rui Ribeiro; Michiel Rutgers; Marco Antonio Nogueira; Eduardo Mendes da Silva; José Paulo Sousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.