Literature DB >> 26341335

Use of agro-industrial organic sludge amendment to remediate degraded soil: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between fresh and stabilized sludge and establishment of application rates.

Claudete G Chiochetta1, Sylvie Cotelle2, Jean-François Masfaraud2, Hela Toumi2,3, Gaetana Quaranta4, Fabrizio Adani5, Claudemir M Radetski6.   

Abstract

Soil degraded by coal mining activities can be remediated by amendment with agro-industrial organic sludge. However, the environmental impacts associated with this management practice must be properly addressed. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the eco(geno)toxicity of a fresh and a stabilized sludge before use in a laboratory soil remediation test. Chemical analysis of the complex mixtures (degraded soil, fresh sludge, and stabilized sludge) was carried out, as well as a battery of eco(geno)toxicity tests on microbiological enzymes (fluorescein hydrolysis), earthworms, and higher plants (including Vicia faba genotoxicity test), according to published methodologies. The results of these tests showed that fresh sludge was more toxic than sludge stabilized over 6 months toward earthworms and higher plants (lettuce, corn, and wild cabbage), while phyto(geno)toxicity tests with V. faba indicated the same genotoxicity levels for the two types of sludge. In the soil remediation simulation using different mixtures of degraded soil and stabilized sludge, the proportions of 50:50% (dry weight basis) provided the lowest phyto(geno)toxicity effects and this mixture can be used for the revegetation of the contaminated site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agro-industrial sludge; Ecotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Sludge biodegradation; Soil remediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341335     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5310-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  18 in total

Review 1.  Ecotoxicity tests for compost applications.

Authors:  A Kapanen; M Itävaara
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils.

Authors:  C A van Gestel; J J van der Waarde; J G Derksen; E E van der Hoek; M F Veul; S Bouwens; B Rusch; R Kronenburg; G N Stokman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 3.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field.

Authors:  Jaco Vangronsveld; Rolf Herzig; Nele Weyens; Jana Boulet; Kristin Adriaensen; Ann Ruttens; Theo Thewys; Andon Vassilev; Erik Meers; Erika Nehnevajova; Daniel van der Lelie; Michel Mench
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Technological options for the management of biosolids.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; Sally L Brown; Guna N Magesan; Alison H Slade; Michael Quintern; Peter W Clinton; Tim W Payn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Ecotoxicological assessment of organic wastes spread on land: Towards a proposal of a suitable test battery.

Authors:  Pierre Huguier; Nicolas Manier; Laure Chabot; Pascale Bauda; Pascal Pandard
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.291

6.  Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Marilice R Radetski; Albertina X R Corrêa; Vinícius Tischer; Erasmo N Tiepo; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Long-term effect of sewage sludge application on soil humic acids.

Authors:  Fabrizio Adani; Fulvia Tambone
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Significance of microbial communities and interactions in safeguarding reactive mine tailings by ecological engineering.

Authors:  Ivan Nancucheo; D Barrie Johnson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Toxic effects of digested, composted and thermally-dried sewage sludge on three plants.

Authors:  W A Ramírez; X Domene; O Ortiz; J M Alcañiz
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Growth of Jatropha curcas on heavy metal contaminated soil amended with industrial wastes and Azotobacter. A greenhouse study.

Authors:  G P Kumar; S K Yadav; P R Thawale; S K Singh; A A Juwarkar
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of phytoproductivity data in the choice of native plant species to restore a degraded coal mining site amended with a stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Hela Toumi; Renata F S Böhm; Fernanda Engel; Gabriel Poyer-Radetski; Leonardo R Rörig; Fabrizio Adani; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Contaminant bioavailability in soil and phytotoxicity/genotoxicity tests in Vicia faba L.: a case study of boron contamination.

Authors:  Meri Barbafieri; Lucia Giorgetti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.