Literature DB >> 11434283

The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils.

C A van Gestel1, J J van der Waarde, J G Derksen, E E van der Hoek, M F Veul, S Bouwens, B Rusch, R Kronenburg, G N Stokman.   

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of acute and chronic bioassays for the ecological risk assessment of polluted soils, soil samples from a site with an historical mineral oil contamination (< 50-3,300 mg oil/kg dry soil) at the Petroleum Harbour in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, were screened for ecological effects using acute and chronic bioassays. A two-step 0.001 M Ca(NO3)2 extraction at a final solution-to-soil ratio of 1:1 was used to prepare extracts for the acute bioassays. Acute bioassays (< or = 5 d) applied to the 0.001 M Ca(NO3)2 extracts from the polluted and reference soils included growth tests with bacteria (Bacillus sp.), algae (Raphidocelis subcapitata), and plants (Lactuca sativa), immobility tests with nematodes (Plectus acuminatus), springtails (Folsomia candida), and cladocerans (Daphnia magna), and the Microtox test (Vibrio fischeri). Chronic bioassays (four weeks) performed on the same soil samples included tests with L. sativa, F. candida, and earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and the bait-lamina test (substrate consumption). The acute bioassays on Microtox showed a response that corresponded with the level of oil pollution. All other acute bioassays did not show such a consistent response, probably because pollutant levels were too low to cause acute effects. All chronic bioassays showed sublethal responses according to the contaminant levels (oil and in some soils also metals). This shows that chronic bioassays on soil samples are more sensitive in assessing the toxicity of mineral oil contamination in soil than acute bioassays on soil extracts. A pilot scale bioremediation study on soils taken from the two most polluted sites and a control site showed a rapid decline of oil concentrations to reach a stable level within eight weeks. Acute bioassays applied to the soils, using Microtox, algae, and D. magna, and chronic bioassays, using plants, Collembola, earthworms, and bait-lamina consumption, in all cases showed a rapid reduction of toxicity, which could be attributed to the degradation of light oil fractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434283     DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2001)020<1438:tuoaac>2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  20 in total

1.  Water-extractable priority contaminants in LUFA 2.2 soil: back to basics, contextualisation and implications for use as natural standard soil.

Authors:  A C Bastos; M Prodana; J M M Oliveira; C F Calhôa; M J G Santos; A M V M Soares; S Loureiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Leachates from solid wastes: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between leachates obtained from fresh and stabilized industrial organic sludge.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Luís C Goetten; Sônia M Almeida; Gaetana Quaranta; Sylvie Cotelle; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Assessment of toxicity of heavy metal-contaminated soils toward Collembola in the paddy fields supported by laboratory tests.

Authors:  Manping Liu; Jie Xu; Paul Henning Krogh; Jing Song; Longhua Wu; Yongming Luo; Xin Ke
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Marilice R Radetski; Albertina X R Corrêa; Vinícius Tischer; Erasmo N Tiepo; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Amendment application in a multi-contaminated mine soil: effects on soil enzymatic activities and ecotoxicological characteristics.

Authors:  Rebeca Manzano; Elvira Esteban; Jesús M Peñalosa; Paula Alvarenga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Effect of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on hydrocarbon degradation and detoxification of diesel-contaminated soil: a microcosm study.

Authors:  Patricia Giovanella; Lídia de Azevedo Duarte; Daniela Mayumi Kita; Valéria Maia de Oliveira; Lara Durães Sette
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Scenario-targeted toxicity assessment through multiple endpoint bioassays in a soil posing unacceptable environmental risk according to regulatory screening values.

Authors:  A Rodriguez-Ruiz; J Etxebarria; L Boatti; I Marigómez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Bioremediation of diesel contamination at an underground storage tank site: a spatial analysis of the microbial community.

Authors:  Marco Andreolli; Nicola Albertarelli; Silvia Lampis; Pierlorenzo Brignoli; Nazaninalsadat Seyed Khoei; Giovanni Vallini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Toxicity assessment through multiple endpoint bioassays in soils posing environmental risk according to regulatory screening values.

Authors:  A Rodriguez-Ruiz; V Asensio; B Zaldibar; M Soto; I Marigómez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Ecotoxicity assessment of aged petroleum sludge using a suite of effects-based end points in earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Shi-Jie Wang; Zeng-Guang Yan; Guan-Lin Guo; Gui-Lan Lu; Qun-Hui Wang; Fa-Sheng Li
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.