BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computational fluid dynamics modeling is useful in the study of the hemodynamic environment of cerebral aneurysms, but patient-specific measurements of boundary conditions, such as blood flow velocity and pressure, have not been previously applied to the study of flow-diverting stents. We integrated patient-specific intravascular blood flow velocity and pressure measurements into computational models of aneurysms before and after treatment with flow-diverting stents to determine stent effects on aneurysm hemodynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood flow velocity and pressure were measured in peri-aneurysmal locations by use of an intravascular dual-sensor pressure and Doppler velocity guidewire before and after flow-diverting stent treatment of 4 unruptured cerebral aneurysms. These measurements defined inflow and outflow boundary conditions for computational models. Intra-aneurysmal flow rates, wall shear stress, and wall shear stress gradient were calculated. RESULTS: Measurements of inflow velocity and outflow pressure were successful in all 4 patients. Computational models incorporating these measurements demonstrated significant reductions in intra-aneurysmal wall shear stress and wall shear stress gradient and a trend in reduced intra-aneurysmal blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of intravascular dual-sensor guidewire measurements of blood flow velocity and blood pressure provided patient-specific computational models of cerebral aneurysms. Aneurysm treatment with flow-diverting stents reduces blood flow and hemodynamic shear stress in the aneurysm dome.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computational fluid dynamics modeling is useful in the study of the hemodynamic environment of cerebral aneurysms, but patient-specific measurements of boundary conditions, such as blood flow velocity and pressure, have not been previously applied to the study of flow-diverting stents. We integrated patient-specific intravascular blood flow velocity and pressure measurements into computational models of aneurysms before and after treatment with flow-diverting stents to determine stent effects on aneurysm hemodynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood flow velocity and pressure were measured in peri-aneurysmal locations by use of an intravascular dual-sensor pressure and Doppler velocity guidewire before and after flow-diverting stent treatment of 4 unruptured cerebral aneurysms. These measurements defined inflow and outflow boundary conditions for computational models. Intra-aneurysmal flow rates, wall shear stress, and wall shear stress gradient were calculated. RESULTS: Measurements of inflow velocity and outflow pressure were successful in all 4 patients. Computational models incorporating these measurements demonstrated significant reductions in intra-aneurysmal wall shear stress and wall shear stress gradient and a trend in reduced intra-aneurysmal blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of intravascular dual-sensor guidewire measurements of blood flow velocity and blood pressure provided patient-specific computational models of cerebral aneurysms. Aneurysm treatment with flow-diverting stents reduces blood flow and hemodynamic shear stress in the aneurysm dome.
Authors: Z Kulcsár; E Houdart; A Bonafé; G Parker; J Millar; A J P Goddard; S Renowden; G Gál; B Turowski; K Mitchell; F Gray; M Rodriguez; R van den Berg; A Gruber; H Desal; I Wanke; D A Rüfenacht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gill E Sviri; Basavaraj Ghodke; Gavin W Britz; Colleen M Douville; David R Haynor; Ali H Mesiwala; Arthur M Lam; David W Newell Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Yiemeng Hoi; Bruce A Wasserman; Yuanyuan J Xie; Samer S Najjar; Luigi Ferruci; Edward G Lakatta; Gary Gerstenblith; David A Steinman Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Liang-Der Jou; Christopher M Quick; William L Young; Michael T Lawton; Randall Higashida; Alastair Martin; David Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hector Fernandez; Juan M Macho; Jordi Blasco; Luis San Roman; Werner Mailaender; Luis Serra; Ignacio Larrabide Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Sabine Rolland du Roscoat; Christian Geindreau; Venkat K Chivukula; Patrick M McGah; John D Nerva; Ryan P Morton; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: G Gascou; K Lobotesis; H Brunel; P Machi; C Riquelme; O Eker; A Bonafé; V Costalat Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Laurel M M Marsh; Michael C Barbour; Venkat Keshav Chivukula; Fanette Chassagne; Cory M Kelly; Samuel H Levy; Louis J Kim; Michael R Levitt; Alberto Aliseda Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Mahsa Ghaffari; Ali Alaraj; Xinjian Du; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Fady T Charbel; Andreas A Linninger Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: P M McGah; J D Nerva; R P Morton; M C Barbour; M R Levitt; P D Mourad; L J Kim; A Aliseda Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 2.833