Literature DB >> 23860039

Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care.

Fiona A Miller1, Robin Z Hayeems2, Jessica P Bytautas2, Philippe L Bedard3, Scott Ernst4, Hal Hirte5, Sebastien Hotte5, Amit Oza3, Albiruni Razak3, Stephen Welch4, Eric Winquist4, Janet Dancey6, Lillian L Siu3.   

Abstract

Developments in genomics, including next-generation sequencing technologies, are expected to enable a more personalized approach to clinical care, with improved risk stratification and treatment selection. In oncology, personalized medicine is particularly advanced and increasingly used to identify oncogenic variants in tumor tissue that predict responsiveness to specific drugs. Yet, the translational research needed to validate these technologies will be conducted in patients with late-stage cancer and is expected to produce results of variable clinical significance and incidentally identify genetic risks. To explore the experiential context in which much of personalized cancer care will be developed and evaluated, we conducted a qualitative interview study alongside a pilot feasibility study of targeted DNA sequencing of metastatic tumor biopsies in adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. We recruited 29/73 patients and 14/17 physicians; transcripts from semi-structured interviews were analyzed for thematic patterns using an interpretive descriptive approach. Patient hopes of benefit from research participation were enhanced by the promise of novel and targeted treatment but challenged by non-findings or by limited access to relevant trials. Family obligations informed a willingness to receive genetic information, which was perceived as burdensome given disease stage or as inconsequential given faced challenges. Physicians were optimistic about long-term potential but conservative about immediate benefits and mindful of elevated patient expectations; consent and counseling processes were expected to mitigate challenges from incidental findings. These findings suggest the need for information and decision tools to support physicians in communicating realistic prospects of benefit, and for cautious approaches to the generation of incidental genetic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23860039      PMCID: PMC3925281          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  39 in total

1.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics: theoretical justifications and practical strategies.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Sarah Cooke; Gill Crawford; Anneke Lucassen; Michael Parker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is now.

Authors:  Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; M Kai He; Damon M Seils; Neal J Meropol; Ellyn Micco; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Broadstock; S Michie; T Marteau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Screening for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in unselected Jewish women.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Aletta Poll; Robert Royer; Marcia Llacuachaqui; Anna Tulman; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A qualitative assessment of the experience of participating in a cancer-related clinical trial.

Authors:  Addie C Wootten; Jo M Abbott; Heather M Siddons; Mark A Rosenthal; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Michael Hsing; Sek Won Kong
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Interest and Attitudes of Patients With Advanced Cancer With Regard to Secondary Germline Findings From Tumor Genomic Profiling.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Elyse Shuk; Margaux C Genoff; Vivian M Rodríguez; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Patient hopes for diagnostic genomic sequencing: roles of uncertainty and social status.

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Elizabeth G Moore; Cristina Leos; Christine Rini
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Next generation sequencing in cardiomyopathy: towards personalized genomics and medicine.

Authors:  Amitabh Biswas; V R Rao; Sandeep Seth; S K Maulik
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Challenges of coverage policy development for next-generation tumor sequencing panels: experts and payers weigh in.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Christine B Weldon; R Kate Kelley; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Ben Storey; Veronica Quinn; Belinda Rahman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Prospective Decision Analysis Study of Clinical Genomic Testing in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Impact on Outcomes and Patient Perceptions.

Authors:  Daniel G Stover; Raquel E Reinbolt; Elizabeth J Adams; Sarah Asad; Katlyn Tolliver; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Cynthia D Timmers; Susan Gillespie; James L Chen; Siraj Mahamed Ali; Katharine A Collier; Mathew A Cherian; Anne M Noonan; Sagar Sardesai; Jeffrey VanDeusen; Robert Wesolowski; Nicole Williams; Clara N Lee; Charles L Shapiro; Erin R Macrae; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Maryam B Lustberg
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-11-18

9.  Patient/parent perspectives on genomic tumor profiling of pediatric solid tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) experience.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Steven G DuBois; Julia Glade Bender; AeRang Kim; Brian D Crompton; Stephanie C Meyer; Katherine A Janeway; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 10.  Translating cancer genomes and transcriptomes for precision oncology.

Authors:  Sameek Roychowdhury; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.