Literature DB >> 19960208

A qualitative assessment of the experience of participating in a cancer-related clinical trial.

Addie C Wootten1, Jo M Abbott, Heather M Siddons, Mark A Rosenthal, Anthony J Costello.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the experiences of patients enrolled in a cancer-related clinical drug treatment trial utilising a qualitative focus-group methodology. Specifically, this study aimed to explore the impact of social and family support, the challenges and advantages of taking part in a clinical trial and the experiences of patients at the conclusion of the trial.
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted at a public hospital in Melbourne in 2008. A total of 14 participants were recruited. Three focus groups and two interviews were conducted with 13 patients who had completed a cancer-related clinical trial. Comments from a letter written by a trial participant were also analysed. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded according to emerging themes.
RESULTS: Information obtained was grouped around four main themes; making sense of trial participation, challenges of treatment in the context of clinical trial participation, support during trial participation and coping with trial conclusion. Participants experienced a mixture of hope, uncertainty and apprehension as they considered whether to take part in a clinical trial. At different stages of the trial they made sense of their participation by thinking about the possible benefits of participation. Trial participation was also associated with a number of emotional and practical challenges. Generally, participants were very positive about the support they received from health professionals, family and friends. The end of the trial was associated with a mix of emotions, including relief, disappointment, hope of future help, uncertainty and abandonment.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial participation is a positive experience for many patients with cancer, although there are a number of associated practical and emotional challenges. Trial participants may benefit from closer follow-up from clinical trial staff, especially the treating doctor, assessment of support needs and help in re-evaluating the meaning of their trial participation if their initial hopes and expectations are not met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19960208     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0787-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  11 in total

1.  The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry.

Authors:  Francesc Borrell-Carrió; Anthony L Suchman; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Attitudes towards clinical research amongst participants and nonparticipants.

Authors:  S M Madsen; M R Mirza; S Holm; K L Hilsted; K Kampmann; P Riis
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

4.  A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials.

Authors:  S Moore
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Differences in attitudes between patients with primary colorectal cancer and patients with secondary colorectal cancer: is it reflected in their willingness to participate in drug trials?

Authors:  G Garcea; T Lloyd; W P Steward; A R Dennison; D P Berry
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials. Report of a pilot study.

Authors:  K Cox; M Avis
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  A survey of breast cancer patients' views on entry into several clinical studies.

Authors:  K Burnet; J Benson; H Earl; H Thornton; K Cox; A D Purushotham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus).

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Barry D Bultz; Donald G Morris
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Z A Nurgat; W Craig; N C Campbell; J D Bissett; J Cassidy; M C Nicolson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A randomised controlled trial of nurse-managed trial conclusion following early phase cancer trial participation.

Authors:  K Cox; E Wilson; A Arthur; R Elkan; S Armstrong
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Assessing research participants' perceptions of their clinical research experiences.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Jennifer Yessis; Barry S Coller; David K Henderson
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Understanding Treatment Burden and Quality of Life Impact of Participating in an Early-Phase Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stacey Crane; Lori Backus; Beth Stockman; Janet S Carpenter; Li Lin; Joan Haase
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Cancer-related psychosocial research: what are the perspectives of cancer care centre users on participation?

Authors:  Julie Hepworth; Ann R R Robertson; Anita Jhunjhunwala; Glyn C Jarvis; Chris McVittie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Peruvian Female Sex Workers' Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Mariam Davtyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014-08-14

5.  Evaluation of patient enrollment in oncology phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Diane A J van der Biessen; Merlijn A Cranendonk; Gaia Schiavon; Bronno van der Holt; Erik A C Wiemer; Ferry A L M Eskens; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-21

6.  Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Jessica P Bytautas; Philippe L Bedard; Scott Ernst; Hal Hirte; Sebastien Hotte; Amit Oza; Albiruni Razak; Stephen Welch; Eric Winquist; Janet Dancey; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Who Needs What? Perceptions of Patients and Caregivers in Oncology Phase 1 Trials.

Authors:  Victoria Rezash; Janice Reed; Barbara Gedeon; Eric Parsons; Sandra Siedlecki; Bradley Daniels; Dale R Shepard
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-02-19

8.  A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool.

Authors:  Hala T Borno; Brian M Bakke; Celia Kaplan; Anke Hebig-Prophet; Jessica Chao; Yoon-Ji Kim; Jan Yeager; Pelin Cinar; Eric Small; Christy Boscardin; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  The experience of adolescents participating in a randomised clinical trial in the field of mental health: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nick Midgley; Danny Isaacs; Katharina Weitkamp; Mary Target
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2).

Authors:  Clare Warnock; Karen Lord; Bethany Taylor; Angela Tod
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.