Literature DB >> 23859581

Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Katie E Golden1, Anna Marie Chang, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies suggest that a decreased cardiac catheterization rate for women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is partially attributed to gender differences in patient preferences for testing. The hypothesis was that these preferences are influenced by physician recommendations for cardiovascular testing.
METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients who presented to an emergency department (ED) with chest pain. At the time of ED disposition, patients were surveyed to assess whether or not the doctor discussed the possibility of coronary artery disease (CAD), the physician's recommendations for diagnostic testing, and the patient's preferences for further testing. The survey was repeated at the time of discharge from the hospital if the patient was admitted and again at 30 days for all patients. The main outcome was patient-reported physician recommendation for testing, and the secondary outcome was patient preference for cardiovascular testing.
RESULTS: There were 206 patients enrolled (118 women, 88 men). Women were less likely than men to receive cardiac catheterization as inpatients (9.8% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.04). In the ED, women were less likely to be recommended for stress testing (8.5% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.02) or cardiac catheterization (4.2% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.02) or to see a cardiologist (8.5% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.01). As inpatients, women were more likely to be told that no further testing was needed (70.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.03). While there was higher incidence of prior CAD and myocardial infarction among the men in the study, analysis after removal of these patients did not alter results. Physicians were less likely to counsel women about diagnostic testing options in the ED (10.1% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03), as inpatients (11.5% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01), and as outpatients (26.1% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.04). No patients in the study refused their doctors' recommendations. Women were less likely to prefer catheterization in the ED (5.1% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.01) and were more likely to prefer no further testing as inpatients (60.7% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Women who presented to the ED with symptoms concerning for ACS reported lower rates of physician recommendation for cardiovascular testing, as well as lower rates of counseling regarding cardiac etiologies of their chest pain. These findings suggest sex differences in preference for cardiovascular testing may be partially explained by the discussions between women and their doctors.
© 2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23859581      PMCID: PMC3810172          DOI: 10.1111/acem.12169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  44 in total

1.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Myocardial sestamibi single-photon emission tomography: variations in reference values with gender, age and rest versus stress?

Authors:  J Toft; B Hesse; A Rabol; S Carstensen; S Ali
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-04

3.  Sex bias in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of patient preference.

Authors:  Bryn E Mumma; Brigitte M Baumann; Deborah B Diercks; Kevin M Takakuwa; Caren F Campbell; Frances S Shofer; Anna Marie Chang; Molly K Jones; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  The value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.

Authors:  P N Dionisopoulos; J D Collins; S C Smart; T A Knickelbine; K B Sagar
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Disparities in the emergency department evaluation of chest pain patients.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Penelope M Keyl; Gary B Green
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Sex differences in risk factors, treatment and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study.

Authors:  B Hanratty; D A Lawlor; M B Robinson; R J Sapsford; D Greenwood; A Hall
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina.

Authors:  Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Lack of sex disparity in cardiovascular testing after coronary computerized tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Catherine T Ginty; Anna Marie Chang; Asako C Matsuura; Christopher Decker; Jeffrey Le; Michael Green; Harold I Litt; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO-1 Investigators.

Authors:  L K Newby; W R Rutsch; R M Califf; M L Simoons; P E Aylward; P W Armstrong; L H Woodlief; K L Lee; E J Topol; F Van de Werf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  8 in total

1.  Race- and sex-related differences in care for patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Prashant D Bhave; Xin Lu; Saket Girotra; Hooman Kamel; Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  A Policy Statement on Cardiovascular Test Substitution and Authorization: Principles of Patient-Centered Noninvasive Testing.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Bobak Heydari; Judy Hung; Raymond Y Kwong; Jonathan R Lindner; Koen Nieman; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Population-level differences in revascularization treatment and outcomes among various United States subpopulations.

Authors:  Garth Graham; Yang-Yu Karen Xiao; Dan Rappoport; Saima Siddiqi
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

4.  Disparities and Temporal Trends in Stroke Care Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The FLiPER-AF Stroke Study.

Authors:  Chuanhui Dong; Kefeng Wang; Marco R Di Tullio; Carolina Gutierrez; Sebastian Koch; Enid J García; Juan Carlos Zevallos; Ulises Nobo; Ryan C Martin; W Scott Burgin; David Z Rose; Jose G Romano; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Int J Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke       Date:  2019-07-22

5.  Differences in the pre-hospital management of women and men with stroke by emergency medical services in New South Wales.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Cheryl Carcel; Benjumin Hsu; Sultana Shajahan; Matthew Miller; Sanne Peters; Deborah A Randall; Alys Havard; Julie Redfern; Craig S Anderson; Louisa Jorm; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 12.776

6.  Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Paul I Musey; Fernanda Bellolio; Suneel Upadhye; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah B Diercks; Michael Gottlieb; Erik P Hess; Michael C Kontos; Bryn E Mumma; Marc A Probst; John H Stahl; Jason P Stopyra; Jeffrey A Kline; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Use of diagnostic coronary angiography in women and men presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Hougesen Bjerking; Kim Wadt Hansen; Mette Madsen; Jan Skov Jensen; Jan Kyst Madsen; Rikke Sørensen; Søren Galatius
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  Acute Coronary Syndromes in Women: Recent Treatment Trends and Outcomes.

Authors:  Garth Graham
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.