Literature DB >> 21146255

Sex bias in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of patient preference.

Bryn E Mumma1, Brigitte M Baumann, Deborah B Diercks, Kevin M Takakuwa, Caren F Campbell, Frances S Shofer, Anna Marie Chang, Molly K Jones, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Women with potential acute coronary syndromes are less likely to receive cardiac catheterization or revascularization than men. We hypothesize that this may be due to different diagnostic test preferences of female and male patients.
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study at 4 emergency departments enrolling patients who presented with symptoms of potential acute coronary syndromes. After hearing the potential benefits and harms of each test, subjects completed a 21-item survey assessing their preference for noninvasive testing versus cardiac catheterization. Based on hypothetical test results, similar questions about medical versus interventional management were asked. Subjects were also queried about likelihood of following physician recommendation for each test or intervention. Actual 30-day testing and interventions were recorded. The main outcome was patient preference about each procedure and the likelihood of patient saying they would accept the physician recommendation.
RESULTS: One thousand eighty patients enrolled; 652 (60%) were admitted to the hospital. With regard to diagnostic test preference, both women and men preferred stress test to catheterization (women 58% versus men 52%; difference 6% [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.06% to 12%]), and the proportion of women and men who would accept the physician recommendation for stress tests was similar (85% for both); however, the stated acceptance rate for cardiac catheterization was lower for women (65% versus 75%; difference -10% [95% CI -15% to -4%]). Women were 6% less likely (67% versus 73%; 95% CI for difference 12% to 0.5%) to accept percutaneous coronary intervention over medical therapy and 7% less likely (61% versus 68%; 95% CI for difference -13% to 1%) to desire coronary artery bypass grafting over medical therapy. The survey results are consistent with the patients' clinical course. During the initial hospitalization, women were less likely to receive diagnostic testing of any type (38% versus 45%; difference -7%; 95% CI for the difference -13% to -1.5%) and cardiac catheterization (10% versus 17%; difference -7% [95% CI -11% to -2%]). Revascularization was infrequent in both groups (4% versus 6%; difference -2% [95% CI -5% to 0.6%]).
CONCLUSION: Although women and men had similar preferences about cardiac diagnostic tests and treatment options, women were less likely than men to say they would accept the physician recommendation for any intervention. Patient preference may partially explain the disparity in cardiovascular testing between women and men.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146255     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  11 in total

1.  Sex, race, and insurance status differences in hospital treatment and outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Scott D Casey; Bryn E Mumma
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Authors:  Katie E Golden; Anna Marie Chang; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Do sex differences exist in patient preferences for cardiovascular testing?

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; David J Magid
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography, myocardial CT perfusion, myocardial perfusion MRI, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  S Feger; M Rief; E Zimmermann; F Richter; R Roehle; M Dewey; E Schönenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Women who experience a myocardial infarction at a young age have worse outcomes compared with men: the Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI registry.

Authors:  Ersilia M DeFilippis; Bradley L Collins; Avinainder Singh; David W Biery; Amber Fatima; Arman Qamar; Adam N Berman; Ankur Gupta; Mary Cawley; Malissa J Wood; Josh Klein; Jon Hainer; Martha Gulati; Viviany R Taqueti; Marcelo F Di Carli; Khurram Nasir; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Insurance status and the transfer of hospitalized patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; Xin Lu; Gary E Rosenthal; Peter Cram
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Paul I Musey; Fernanda Bellolio; Suneel Upadhye; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah B Diercks; Michael Gottlieb; Erik P Hess; Michael C Kontos; Bryn E Mumma; Marc A Probst; John H Stahl; Jason P Stopyra; Jeffrey A Kline; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Sarah Feger; Peter Martus; Michael Laule; Marc Dewey; Eva Schönenberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Alcohol and drug use disorders among patients with myocardial infarction: associations with disparities in care and mortality.

Authors:  Cynthia A Beck; Danielle A Southern; Richard Saitz; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of diagnostic coronary angiography in women and men presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Hougesen Bjerking; Kim Wadt Hansen; Mette Madsen; Jan Skov Jensen; Jan Kyst Madsen; Rikke Sørensen; Søren Galatius
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.