Literature DB >> 10029647

The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

K A Schulman1, J A Berlin, W Harless, J F Kerner, S Sistrunk, B J Gersh, R Dubé, C K Taleghani, J E Burke, S Williams, J M Eisenberg, J J Escarce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have reported differences in the use of cardiovascular procedures according to the race and sex of the patient. Whether the differences stem from differences in the recommendations of physicians remains uncertain.
METHODS: We developed a computerized survey instrument to assess physicians' recommendations for managing chest pain. Actors portrayed patients with particular characteristics in scripted interviews about their symptoms. A total of 720 physicians at two national meetings of organizations of primary care physicians participated in the survey. Each physician viewed a recorded interview and was given other data about a hypothetical patient. He or she then made recommendations about that patient's care. We used multivariate logistic-regression analysis to assess the effects of the race and sex of the patients on treatment recommendations, while controlling for the physicians' assessment of the probability of coronary artery disease as well as for the age of the patient, the level of coronary risk, the type of chest pain, and the results of an exercise stress test.
RESULTS: The physicians' mean (+/-SD) estimates of the probability of coronary artery disease were lower for women (probability, 64.1+/-19.3 percent, vs. 69.2+/-18.2 percent for men; P<0.001), younger patients (63.8+/-19.5 percent for patients who were 55 years old, vs. 69.5+/-17.9 percent for patients who were 70 years old; P<0.001), and patients with nonanginal pain (58.3+/-19.0 percent, vs. 64.4+/-18.3 percent for patients with possible angina and 77.1+/-14.0 percent for those with definite angina; P=0.001). Logistic-regression analysis indicated that women (odds ratio, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.9; P=0.02) and blacks (odds ratio, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.9; P=0.02) were less likely to be referred for cardiac catheterization than men and whites, respectively. Analysis of race-sex interactions showed that black women were significantly less likely to be referred for catheterization than white men (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.7; P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the race and sex of a patient independently influence how physicians manage chest pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Academy of Family Practice; American College of Physicians; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10029647     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199902253400806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  440 in total

1.  Racism in medicine.

Authors:  G C Dennis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Cardiovascular disease in African-American women: a dilemma of culture.

Authors:  G C Dennis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  To mitigate, resist, or undo: addressing structural influences on the health of urban populations.

Authors:  A T Geronimus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Community, service, and policy strategies to improve health care access in the changing urban environment.

Authors:  D P Andrulis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Racial differences in the utilization of oral anticoagulant therapy in heart failure: a study of elderly hospitalized patients.

Authors:  S A Ibrahim; C K Kwoh; D L Harper; D W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model.

Authors:  C Brach; I Fraser
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Racial and ethnic differences in the use of cardiovascular procedures: findings from the California Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  E Ford; J Newman; K Deosaransingh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Racial and ethnic disparities and primary care experience.

Authors:  C M Clancy; D B Stryer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.