Literature DB >> 11076987

Sex differences in risk factors, treatment and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study.

B Hanratty1, D A Lawlor, M B Robinson, R J Sapsford, D Greenwood, A Hall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease is the major cause of death of postmenopausal women in industrialised countries. Although acute myocardial infarction (AMI) affects men in greater numbers, the short-term outcomes for women are worse. In the longer term, studies suggest that mortality risk for women is lower or similar to that of men. However, length of follow up and adjustment for confounding factors have varied and more importantly, the association between treatment and outcomes has not been examined. STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between sex differences in risk factors and hospital treatment and mortality after AMI.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study collecting demographic and clinical data on cases of AMI admitted to hospitals in Yorkshire. The main outcome measures were mortality status at discharge from hospital and two years later.
SETTING: All district and university hospitals accepting emergency admissions in the former Yorkshire National Health Service (NHS) region of northern England. PARTICIPANTS: 3684 consecutive patients with a possible diagnosis of AMI admitted to hospitals in Yorkshire between 1 September and 30 November 1995. MAIN
RESULTS: AMI was confirmed by the attending consultant for 2196 admissions (2153 people, 850 women and 1303 men). Women were older and less likely than men to be smokers or have a history of ischaemic heart disease. Crude inhospital mortality was higher for women (30% versus 19% for men, crude odds ratio of death before discharge for women 1.78, 95% confidence intervals 1.46, 2.18, p=0.00). This difference persisted after adjustment for age, risk factors and comorbidities (adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04, 1.63, p=0.02), but was not significant when treatment was taken into account. Women were less likely to be given thrombolysis (37% versus 46%, p<0.01) and aspirin (83% versus 90%, p<0.01), discharged with beta blockers (33% versus 47%, p<0.01) and aspirin (82% versus 88% p<0.01) or be scheduled for angiography, exercise testing or revascularisation. Adjustment for age removed much of the disparity in treatment. Crude mortality rate at two years was higher for women (OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.41, 2.31, p=0.00). Age, existing risk factors and acute treatment accounted for most of this difference, with treatment on discharge having little additional influence.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to hospital with AMI should be offered optimal treatment irrespective of age or sex. Women have a worse prognosis after AMI and under-treatment of older people with aspirin and thrombolysis may be contributing to this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11076987      PMCID: PMC1731594          DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.12.912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  41 in total

Review 1.  Ageism in cardiology.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-20

2.  Do not resuscitate decisions: flogging dead horses or a dignified death? Resuscitation should not be withheld from elderly people without discussion.

Authors:  S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

3.  Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials.

Authors:  S Yusuf; R Peto; J Lewis; R Collins; P Sleight
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.194

4.  Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators.

Authors:  J S Hochman; J E Tamis; T D Thompson; W D Weaver; H D White; F Van de Werf; P Aylward; E J Topol; R M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Multivariate survival analysis for the assessment of prognostic factors and risk categories after recovery from acute myocardial infarction: the Belgian situation.

Authors:  J Pardaens; E Lesaffre; J L Willems; H De Geest
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Acute myocardial infarction in women. The influence of age on complications and mortality.

Authors:  T Peter; R Harper; M Luxton; C Penington; J G Sloman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1978-02-25       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Long-term prognosis after recovery from myocardial infarction: a nine year follow-up of the Perth Coronary Register.

Authors:  C A Martin; P L Thompson; B K Armstrong; M S Hobbs; N de Klerk
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Prognosis of women with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease--a comparison with course of disease among men.

Authors:  E Weinblatt; S Shapiro; C W Frank
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Acute myocardial infarction: sex-related differences in prognosis.

Authors:  M Puletti; L Sunseri; M Curione; S M Erba; C Borgia
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Five-year survival of 728 patients after myocardial infarction. A community study.

Authors:  S Pohjola; P Siltanen; M Romo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-02
View more
  29 in total

1.  Early and late mortality after myocardial infarction in men and women: prospective observational study.

Authors:  D Griffith; K Hamilton; J Norrie; C Isles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Meat intake and incidence of cardiovascular disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis of the Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS).

Authors:  Chika Horikawa; Chiemi Kamada; Shiro Tanaka; Sachiko Tanaka; Atsushi Araki; Hideki Ito; Satoshi Matsunaga; Kazuya Fujihara; Yukio Yoshimura; Yasuo Ohashi; Yasuo Akanuma; Hirohito Sone
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Initial ECG acquisition within 10 minutes of arrival at the emergency department in persons with chest pain: time and gender differences.

Authors:  Jessica Zègre-Hemsey; Claire E Sommargren; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Aspirin use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: the British Women's Heart and Health Study.

Authors:  D A Lawlor; C Bedford; M Taylor; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

6.  Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Authors:  Katie E Golden; Anna Marie Chang; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Magnitude and impact of multiple chronic conditions with advancing age in older adults hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mayra Tisminetzky; Hoa L Nguyen; Jerry H Gurwitz; David McManus; Joel Gore; Sonal Singh; Jorge Yarzebski; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chen-Fang Lin; Li-Jiuan Shen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Churn-Shiouh Gau; Fe-Lin Lin Wu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Trends in incidence and case fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction in Denmark and Sweden.

Authors:  S Z Abildstrom; S Rasmussen; M Rosén; M Madsen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Mortality among patients with hypertension from 1995 to 2005: a population-based study.

Authors:  Karen Tu; Zhongliang Chen; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.