Literature DB >> 16449728

Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina.

Caroline Daly1, Felicity Clemens, Jose L Lopez Sendon, Luigi Tavazzi, Eric Boersma, Nicholas Danchin, Francois Delahaye, Anselm Gitt, Desmond Julian, David Mulcahy, Witold Ruzyllo, Kristian Thygesen, Freek Verheugt, Kim M Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the impact of gender on the investigation and subsequent management of stable angina and to assess gender differences in clinical outcome at 1 year. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina enrolled patients with a clinical diagnosis of stable angina on initial assessment by a cardiologist. Baseline clinical details and cardiac investigations planned or performed within a 4-week period of the assessment were recorded, and follow-up data were collected at 1 year. A total of 3779 patients were included in the survey; 42% were female. Women were less likely to undergo an exercise ECG (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.95) and less likely to be referred for coronary angiography (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72). Antiplatelet and statin therapies were used significantly less in women than in men, both at initial assessment and at 1 year, even in those in whom coronary disease had been confirmed. Women with confirmed coronary disease were less likely to be revascularized than their male counterparts and were twice as likely to suffer death or nonfatal myocardial infarction during the 1-year follow-up period (hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.85), even after multivariable adjustment for age, abnormal ventricular function, severity of coronary disease, and diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender bias has been identified in the use of investigations and evidence-based medical therapy in stable angina. Women were also less likely to be revascularized. The observed bias is of particular concern in light of the adverse prognosis observed among women with stable angina and confirmed coronary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449728     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.561647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  86 in total

1.  Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science.

Authors:  Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Luciana F Seabra; François-Pierre Mongeon; Shuaib M Abdullah; Sanjeev A Francis; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

4.  Gender differences in therapeutic recommendation after diagnostic coronary angiography: insights from the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Tobias Heer; Matthias Hochadel; Karin Schmidt; Julinda Mehilli; Ralf Zahn; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Hamm; Michael Böhm; Georg Ertl; Dietrich Andresen; Steffen Massberg; Jochen Senges; Günter Pilz; Anselm K Gitt; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Review of gated SPECT imaging in women with suspected coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Vahini V Naidoo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Sex-Based Differences in Chronic Total Occlusion Management.

Authors:  Amy Cheney; Kathleen E Kearney; William Lombardi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Primary and secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease in women.

Authors:  Priya Kohli
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Raffaelle Bugiardini; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Gender differences in utilization of effective cardiovascular secondary prevention: a Cleveland clinic prevention database study.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Byron Hoogwerf; Julie Huang; Danielle M Brennan; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Treatment of chronic CAD--do the guidelines (ESC, AHA) reflect daily practice?

Authors:  Harald Tillmanns; Ali Erdogan; Daniel Sedding
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.