PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse factors predicting the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration (TTFNA) for solid noncalcified, subsolid and mixed pulmonary nodules, with particular attention to those responsible for false negative results with a view to suggesting a method for their correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2010, we retrospectively reviewed the CT images of 198 patients of both sexes (124 males and 74 females; mean age, 70 years; range age, 44-90) used for the guidance of TTFNA of pulmonary nodules. Aspects considered were: lesion size and density, distance from the pleura, and lesion site. Multiplanar reformatted images (MPR) were retrospectively obtained in the sagittal and axial oblique planes relative to needle orientation. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy of TTFNA CT-guided biopsy was 86% for nodules between 0.7 and 3 cm, 83.3% for those between 0.7 and 1.5 cm, and 92% for those between 2 and 3 cm. Accuracy was 95.1% for solid pulmonary nodules, 84.6% for mixed nodules, and 66.6% for subsolid nodules. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided TTFNA in relation to the distance between the nodule and the pleural plane was 95.6% for lesions adhering to the pleura and 83.5% for central ones. The diagnostic accuracy was 84.2% for the pulmonary upper lobe nodules, 85.3% for the lower lobe and 90.9% for those in the lingula and middle lobe. In 75% of false negative and inadequate/insufficient cases the needle was found to lie outside the lesion, after reconstruction of the needle path by MPR. CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive factors of CT-guided TTFNA are related to the nodule size, density and distance from the pleural plane. The most common negative predictive factor of CT-guided TTFNA is the wrong position of the needle tip, as observed in the sagittal and axial oblique sections of the MPR reconstructions. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided TTFNA can therefore be improved by using the MPR technique to plan the needle path during the FNA procedure.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse factors predicting the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration (TTFNA) for solid noncalcified, subsolid and mixed pulmonary nodules, with particular attention to those responsible for false negative results with a view to suggesting a method for their correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2010, we retrospectively reviewed the CT images of 198 patients of both sexes (124 males and 74 females; mean age, 70 years; range age, 44-90) used for the guidance of TTFNA of pulmonary nodules. Aspects considered were: lesion size and density, distance from the pleura, and lesion site. Multiplanar reformatted images (MPR) were retrospectively obtained in the sagittal and axial oblique planes relative to needle orientation. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy of TTFNA CT-guided biopsy was 86% for nodules between 0.7 and 3 cm, 83.3% for those between 0.7 and 1.5 cm, and 92% for those between 2 and 3 cm. Accuracy was 95.1% for solid pulmonary nodules, 84.6% for mixed nodules, and 66.6% for subsolid nodules. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided TTFNA in relation to the distance between the nodule and the pleural plane was 95.6% for lesions adhering to the pleura and 83.5% for central ones. The diagnostic accuracy was 84.2% for the pulmonary upper lobe nodules, 85.3% for the lower lobe and 90.9% for those in the lingula and middle lobe. In 75% of false negative and inadequate/insufficient cases the needle was found to lie outside the lesion, after reconstruction of the needle path by MPR. CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive factors of CT-guided TTFNA are related to the nodule size, density and distance from the pleural plane. The most common negative predictive factor of CT-guided TTFNA is the wrong position of the needle tip, as observed in the sagittal and axial oblique sections of the MPR reconstructions. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided TTFNA can therefore be improved by using the MPR technique to plan the needle path during the FNA procedure.
Authors: P M Boiselle; J A Shepard; E J Mark; W M Szyfelbein; C M Fan; P J Slanetz; B Trotman-Dickenson; E F Halpern; S W Miller; T C McLoud Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S Rizzo; L Preda; S Raimondi; S Meroni; M Belmonte; L Monfardini; G Veronesi; M Bellomi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: N F Khouri; F P Stitik; Y S Erozan; P K Gupta; W S Kim; W W Scott; U M Hamper; R B Mann; J C Eggleston; R R Baker Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1985-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: F Caranci; G Leone; L Ugga; E Cesarano; R Capasso; S Schipani; A Bianco; P Fonio; F Briganti; L Brunese Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2017-02-06