Literature DB >> 23847254

Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties.

Eliel Ben-David1, Muneeb Ahmed, Mohammad Faroja, Marwan Moussa, Ayelet Wandel, Jacob Sosna, Liat Appelbaum, Isaac Nissenbaum, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effects of the surrounding electrical microenvironment and local tissue parameters on the electrical parameters and outcome of irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation in porcine muscle, kidney, and liver tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal Care and Use Committee approval was obtained, and National Institutes of Health guidelines were followed. IRE ablation (n = 90) was applied in muscle (n = 44), kidney (n = 28), and liver (n = 18) tissue in 18 pigs. Two electrodes with tip exposure of 1.5-2 cm were used at varying voltages (1500-3000 V), pulse repetitions (n = 70-100), pulse length (70-100 µsec), and electrode spacing (1.5-2 cm). In muscle tissue, electrodes were placed exactly parallel, in plane, or perpendicular to paraspinal muscle fibers; in kidney tissue, in the cortex or adjacent to the renal medulla; and in liver tissue, with and without metallic or plastic plates placed 1-2 cm from electrodes. Ablation zones were determined at gross pathologic (90-120 minutes after IRE) and immunohistopathologic examination (6 hours after) for apoptosis and heat-shock protein markers. Multivariate analysis of variance with multiple comparisons and/or paired t tests and regression analysis were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) ablation zones in muscle were 6.2 cm ± 0.3 × 4.2 cm ± 0.3 for parallel electrodes and 4.2 cm ± 0.8 × 3.0 cm ± 0.5 for in-plane application. Perpendicular orientation resulted in a cross-shaped zone. Orientation significantly affected IRE current applied (28.5-31.7A for parallel, 29.5-39.7A for perpendicular; P = .003). For kidney cortex, ovoid zones of 1.5 cm ± 0.1 × 0.5 cm ± 0.0 to 2.5 cm ± 0.1 × 1.3 cm ± 0.1 were seen. Placement of electrodes less than 5 mm from the medullary pyramids resulted in treatment effect arcing into the collecting system. For liver tissue, symmetric 2.7 cm ± 0.2 × 1.4 cm ± 0.3 coagulation areas were seen without the metallic plate but asymmetric coagulation was seen with the metallic plate.
CONCLUSION: IRE treatment zones are sensitive to varying electrical conductivity in tissues. Electrode location, orientation, and heterogeneities in local environment must be considered in planning ablation treatment. Online supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23847254      PMCID: PMC4228712          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  A comparative study on validation of a novel cooled-wet electrode for radiofrequency liver ablation.

Authors:  Y Miao; Y Ni; J Yu; G Marchal
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Effect of vessel size on creation of hepatic radiofrequency lesions in pigs: assessment of the "heat sink" effect.

Authors:  David S K Lu; Steven S Raman; Darko J Vodopich; Michael Wang; James Sayre; Charles Lassman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  US findings after irreversible electroporation ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Liat Appelbaum; Eliel Ben-David; Jacob Sosna; Yizhak Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Therapeutic potential of irreversible electroporation in sarcoma.

Authors:  Zhe Yu; Xudong Zhang; Pengcheng Ren; Minghua Zhang; Jixian Qian
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Irreversible electroporation for treatment of liver cancer.

Authors:  Govindarajan Narayanan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-05

7.  Irreversible electroporation ablation: is all the damage nonthermal?

Authors:  Mohammad Faroja; Muneeb Ahmed; Liat Appelbaum; Eliel Ben-David; Marwan Moussa; Jacob Sosna; Isaac Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) of hepatic malignant tumours: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings.

Authors:  P Wiggermann; F Zeman; C Niessen; A Agha; B Trabold; C Stroszczynski; E M Jung
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Ami M Karkar; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Ronald P Dematteo; George I Getrajdman; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Edward W Lee; Christine Chen; Veronica E Prieto; Sarah M Dry; Christopher T Loh; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  34 in total

1.  Histological and Mathematical Analysis of the Irreversibly Electroporated Liver Tissue.

Authors:  Chang Kyu Sung; Hong Bae Kim; Jong Hyun Jung; Ku Youn Baik; Kee Wook Moon; Hyung-Sik Kim; Jeong-Han Yi; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-14

2.  Evaluation of a robotic system for irreversible electroporation (IRE) of malignant liver tumors: initial results.

Authors:  L P Beyer; B Pregler; K Michalik; C Niessen; M Dollinger; M Müller; H J Schlitt; C Stroszczynski; P Wiggermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The interaction between irreversible electroporation therapy (IRE) and embolization material using a validated vegetal model: an experimental study.

Authors:  Philip Chan; Catriona McLean; Stephen Chan; Gerard S Goh
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Transcatheter intra-arterial perfusion (TRIP)-MRI biomarkers help detect immediate response to irreversible electroporation of rabbit VX2 liver tumor.

Authors:  Matteo Figini; Kang Zhou; Liang Pan; Chong Sun; Bin Wang; Su Hu; Jia Yang; Junjie Shangguan; Aydin Eresen; Yury Velichko; Vahid Yaghmai; Zhuoli Zhang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  What Are the Effects of Irreversible Electroporation on a Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Model of Osteomyelitis?

Authors:  Nina M Muñoz; Adeeb A Minhaj; Crystal J Dupuis; Joe E Ensor; Natalia Golardi; Jesse M Jaso; Katherine A Dixon; Tomas Appleton Figueira; Jessica R Galloway-Peña; Lori Hill; Samuel A Shelburne; Alda L Tam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Ablative therapy of small renal masses].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; N Wagener; S J Diehl; N Rathmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Feasibility of catheter-directed intraluminal irreversible electroporation of porcine ureter and acute outcomes in response to increasing energy delivery.

Authors:  Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Mikhail Silk; Thomas Wimmer; Sebastien Monette; Simon Kimm; Majid Maybody; Stephen B Solomon; Jonathan Coleman; Jeremy C Durack
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  The state of irreversible electroporation in interventional oncology.

Authors:  Mikhail Silk; David Tahour; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Stephen B Solomon; Raymond H Thornton
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Irreversible Electroporation in the Epidural Space of the Porcine Spine: Effects on Adjacent Structures.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Tomas A Figueira; Mihai Gagea; Joe E Ensor; Katherine Dixon; Amanda McWatters; Sanjay Gupta; David T Fuentes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.