Literature DB >> 27079209

Histological and Mathematical Analysis of the Irreversibly Electroporated Liver Tissue.

Chang Kyu Sung1, Hong Bae Kim2, Jong Hyun Jung3, Ku Youn Baik4, Kee Wook Moon5, Hyung-Sik Kim6, Jeong-Han Yi6, Jong Hoon Chung2,7.   

Abstract

Irreversible electroporation has clinically been used to treat various types of cancer. A plan on how to apply irreversible electroporation before practicing is very important to increase the ablation area and reduce the side effects. Several electrical models have been developed to predict the ablation area with applied electric energy. In this experiment, the static relationship between applied electric energy and ablated area was mathematically and experimentally investigated at 10 hours after applying irreversible electroporation. We performed the irreversible electroporation on the liver tissue of Sprague Dawley rats (male, 8 weeks, weighing 250-350 g). The ablated area was measured based on histological analysis and compared with the mathematical calculation from the electric energy, assuming that the tissue is homogeneous. The ablated area increased with the increase in applied electric energy. The numerically calculated contour lines of electric energy density overlapped well with the apoptotic area induced by the irreversible electroporation. The overlapped area clearly showed that the destructive threshold of apoptosis between electrodes is electric energy density level of 5.9 × 105 J/m3. The results of the present study suggested that the clinical results of the irreversible electroporation on a liver tissue could be predicted through mathematical calculation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H&E staining; TUNEL assay; apoptosis; applied electric energy; irreversible electroporation; mathematical analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27079209      PMCID: PMC5616057          DOI: 10.1177/1533034616640642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  32 in total

1.  Irreversible electroporation and apoptosis in human liver cancer cells induced by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Deyou Xiao; Chenguo Yao; Huan Liu; Chengxiang Li; Jie Cheng; Fei Guo; Liling Tang
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Preclinical analysis of irreversible electroporation on rat liver tissues using a microfabricated electroporator.

Authors:  Youn-Suk Choi; Hong-Bae Kim; Junho Chung; Hyung-Sik Kim; Jeong-Han Yi; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  In situ monitoring of electric field distribution in mouse tumor during electroporation.

Authors:  Matej Kranjc; Boštjan Markelc; Franci Bajd; Maja Čemažar; Igor Serša; Tanja Blagus; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Ami M Karkar; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Ronald P Dematteo; George I Getrajdman; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  A review of basic to clinical studies of irreversible electroporation therapy.

Authors:  Chunlan Jiang; Rafael V Davalos; John C Bischof
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of surgically unresectable pancreatic cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Sandeep Bagla; Dimitrios Papadouris
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Intracranial nonthermal irreversible electroporation: in vivo analysis.

Authors:  Paulo A Garcia; John H Rossmeisl; Robert E Neal; Thomas L Ellis; John D Olson; Natalia Henao-Guerrero; John Robertson; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 8.  Comparison of percutaneous ablation technologies in the treatment of malignant liver tumors.

Authors:  Hyeon Yu; Charles T Burke
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Planning irreversible electroporation in the porcine kidney: are numerical simulations reliable for predicting empiric ablation outcomes?

Authors:  Thomas Wimmer; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Narendra Gutta; Paula C Ezell; Sebastien Monette; Majid Maybody; Joseph P Erinjery; Jeremy C Durack; Jonathan A Coleman; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation.

Authors:  Selma Corovic; Igor Lackovic; Primoz Sustaric; Tomaz Sustar; Tomaz Rodic; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterization of irreversible electroporation on the stomach: A feasibility study in rats.

Authors:  Jae Min Lee; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Hong Bae Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Evaluation of electroporated area using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride in a potato model.

Authors:  Seung Jeong; Hongbae Kim; Junhyung Park; Ki Woo Kim; Sung Bo Sim; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Incorporation of Reversible Electroporation Into Electrolysis Accelerates Apoptosis for Rat Liver Tissue.

Authors:  Hong Bae Kim; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.