Literature DB >> 22106355

US findings after irreversible electroporation ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Liat Appelbaum1, Eliel Ben-David, Jacob Sosna, Yizhak Nissenbaum, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize ultrasonographic (US) findings after irreversible electroporation (IRE) to determine the utility of these findings in the accurate assessment of ablation margins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional animal care and use committee approved the study. IRE ablation (n = 58) was performed in vivo in 16 pig livers by using two 18-gauge electroporation electrodes with 2-cm tip exposure, 1.5- or 2.0-cm interelectrode spacing, and an electroporation generator. Energy deposition was applied at 2250-3000 V (pulse length, 50-100 μsec; pulse repetition, 50-100). Ablations were performed under US guidance. Images were obtained during ablation and at defined intervals from 1 minute to 2 hours after the procedure. Zones of ablation were determined at gross and histopathologic examination of samples obtained from animals sacrificed 2-3 hours after IRE. Dimensions of the histologic necrosis zone and US findings were compared and subjected to statistical analysis, including a Student t test and multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: Within 20-50 pulse repetitions of IRE energy, the ablation zone appeared as a hypoechoic area with well-demarcated margins. During the next 8-15 minutes, this zone decreased in size from 3.4 cm ± 0.5 to 2.5 cm ± 0.4 and became progressively more isoechoic. Subsequently, a peripheral hyperechoic rim measuring 2-7 mm (mean, 4 mm ± 1) surrounding the isoechoic zone developed 25-90 minutes (mean, 41 minutes ± 19) after IRE. The final length of the treatment zone, including the rim, increased to 3.3 cm ± 0.6. The final dimensions of the outer margin of this rim provided greatest accuracy (1.7 mm ± 0.2) and tightest correlation (r(2) = 0.89) with gross pathologic findings. Histologic examination demonstrated widened sinusoidal spaces that progressively filled with spatially distributed hemorrhagic infiltrate on a bed of hepatocytes with pyknotic nuclei throughout the treatment zone.
CONCLUSION: US findings in the acute period after IRE are dynamic and evolve. The ablation zone can be best predicted by measuring the external hyperechoic rim that forms 90-120 minutes after ablation. This rim is possibly attributable to evolving hemorrhagic infiltration via widened sinusoids. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22106355     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties.

Authors:  Eliel Ben-David; Muneeb Ahmed; Mohammad Faroja; Marwan Moussa; Ayelet Wandel; Jacob Sosna; Liat Appelbaum; Isaac Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  18F-FDG PET Biomarkers Help Detect Early Metabolic Response to Irreversible Electroporation and Predict Therapeutic Outcomes in a Rat Liver Tumor Model.

Authors:  Xifu Wang; Zhanliang Su; Tianchu Lyu; Matteo Figini; Daniel Procissi; Junjie Shangguan; Chong Sun; Bin Wang; Na Shang; Shanzhi Gu; Quanhong Ma; Andrew C Gordon; Kai Lin; Jian Wang; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem; Vahid Yaghmai; Andrew C Larson; Zhuoli Zhang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Multimodality imaging to assess immediate response to irreversible electroporation in a rat liver tumor model.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Sarah B White; Jodi R Nicolai; Zhuoli Zhang; Derek L West; Dong-Hyun Kim; A Lee Goodwin; Frank H Miller; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Ablation of colorectal liver metastases by irreversible electroporation: results of the COLDFIRE-I ablate-and-resect study.

Authors:  H J Scheffer; K Nielsen; A A J M van Tilborg; J M Vieveen; R A Bouwman; G Kazemier; H W M Niessen; S Meijer; C van Kuijk; M P van den Tol; M R Meijerink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Feasibility of a Modified Biopsy Needle for Irreversible Electroporation Ablation and Periprocedural Tissue Sampling.

Authors:  Thomas Wimmer; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Mikhail Silk; Sebastien Monette; Narendra Gutta; Majid Maybody; Joseph P Erinjery; Jonathan A Coleman; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-06

7.  A three-dimensional in vitro tumor platform for modeling therapeutic irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Christopher B Arena; Christopher S Szot; Paulo A Garcia; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  7.0-T magnetic resonance imaging characterization of acute blood-brain-barrier disruption achieved with intracranial irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Paulo A Garcia; John H Rossmeisl; John L Robertson; John D Olson; Annette J Johnson; Thomas L Ellis; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Hepatic Tumors--Alterations in Venous Structures at Subacute Follow-Up and Evolution at Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marco Dollinger; René Müller-Wille; Florian Zeman; Michael Haimerl; Christoph Niessen; Lukas P Beyer; Sven A Lang; Andreas Teufel; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A Systematic Review about Imaging and Histopathological Findings for Detecting and Evaluating Electroporation Based Treatments Response.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Simona Salati; Antonella Petrillo; Elio Di Bernardo; Roberta Grassi; Raffaele Palaia; Ginevra Danti; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Matteo Cadossi; Gorana Gašljević; Gregor Sersa; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.