| Literature DB >> 25442132 |
Muneeb Ahmed1, Luigi Solbiati2, Christopher L Brace3, David J Breen4, Matthew R Callstrom5, J William Charboneau5, Min-Hua Chen6, Byung Ihn Choi7, Thierry de Baère8, Gerald D Dodd9, Damian E Dupuy10, Debra A Gervais11, David Gianfelice12, Alice R Gillams13, Fred T Lee14, Edward Leen15, Riccardo Lencioni16, Peter J Littrup17, Tito Livraghi18, David S Lu19, John P McGahan20, Maria Franca Meloni21, Boris Nikolic22, Philippe L Pereira23, Ping Liang24, Hyunchul Rhim25, Steven C Rose26, Riad Salem27, Constantinos T Sofocleous28, Stephen B Solomon28, Michael C Soulen29, Masatoshi Tanaka30, Thomas J Vogl31, Bradford J Wood32, S Nahum Goldberg33.
Abstract
Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25442132 PMCID: PMC7660986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol ISSN: 1051-0443 Impact factor: 3.464