Literature DB >> 23169795

Irreversible electroporation ablation: is all the damage nonthermal?

Mohammad Faroja1, Muneeb Ahmed, Liat Appelbaum, Eliel Ben-David, Marwan Moussa, Jacob Sosna, Isaac Nissenbaum, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether high-dose irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation induces thermal effects in normal liver tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal care and use committee approval was obtained prior to the experiments. IRE ablation (n = 78) was performed by a single four-person team in vivo in 22 porcine livers by applying electric current to two 1.3-cm-diameter circular flat-plate electrodes spaced 1 cm apart. Cardiac-gated IRE pulses (n = 40-360) were systematically applied at varying voltages (1500-2900 V). End temperatures at the ablation zone center were measured and were correlated with ablation time, energy parameters, and resultant treatment effect as determined at gross pathologic and histopathologic examination. Temperatures were then monitored at the center and periphery of four ablations created by using a four-electrode IRE array (3000 V, 90 pulses per electrode pair). Data were analyzed by using multivariate analysis of variance with multiple comparisons and/or paired t tests and regression analysis, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Temperature rose above the 34°C baseline after IRE in all flat-plate experiments and correlated linearly (R(2) = 0.39) with IRE "energy dose" (product of voltage and number of pulses) and more tightly in univariate analysis with both voltage and number of pulses. Thus, mean temperatures as high as 86°C ± 3 (standard deviation) were seen for 2500 V and 270 pulses. Ablations of 90 pulses or more at 2500 V produced temperatures of 50°C or greater and classic gross and histopathologic findings of thermal coagulation (pyknotic nuclei and streaming cytoplasm). For lower IRE doses (ie, 2100 V, 90 pulses), temperatures remained below 45°C, and only IRE-associated pathologic findings (ie, swollen sinusoids, dehydrated cells, and hemorrhagic infiltrate) were seen. For the four-electrode arrays, temperatures measured 54.2°C ± 6.1 at the electrode surfaces and 38.6°C ± 3.2 at the ablation zone margin.
CONCLUSION: In some conditions of high intensity, IRE can produce sufficient heating to induce "white zone" thermal coagulation. While this can be useful in some settings to increase tumor destruction, further characterization of the thermal profile created with clinical electrodes and energy parameters is therefore needed to better understand the best ways to avoid unintended damage when ablating near thermally sensitive critical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23169795     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  67 in total

1.  Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties.

Authors:  Eliel Ben-David; Muneeb Ahmed; Mohammad Faroja; Marwan Moussa; Ayelet Wandel; Jacob Sosna; Liat Appelbaum; Isaac Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR imaging enables measurement of therapeutic nanoparticle uptake in rat N1-S1 liver tumors after nanoablation.

Authors:  Joseph L McDevitt; Samdeep K Mouli; Patrick D Tyler; Weiguo Li; Jodi Nicolai; Daniele Procissi; Ann B Ragin; Y Andrew Wang; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem; Andrew C Larson; Reed A Omary
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Cytoreduction for colorectal metastases: liver, lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes, bone, brain. When does it palliate, prolong survival, and potentially cure?

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Susanne Warner; Kaori Ito; Mustafa Raoof; Geena X Wu; Jonathan Kessler; Jae Y Kim; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Successful ablation of lymph nodes using irreversible electroporation (IRE) in a porcine survival model.

Authors:  Stefan Fritz; Christof M Sommer; Thomas Longerich; Clemens Kuhn-Neureuther; Boris Radeleff; Jens Werner; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Technical and practical considerations for device selection in locoregional ablative therapy.

Authors:  Sean P Zivin; Ron C Gaba
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of three-dimensional shear-wave elastographic findings in assessing the liver ablation volume after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Hisashi Oshiro; Saori Ogawa; Mitsuyoshi Honjo; Takeshi Hara; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy.

Authors:  Katrina F Chu; Damian E Dupuy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Normal Porcine Ureter Retains Lumen Wall Integrity but Not Patency Following Catheter-Directed Irreversible Electroporation: Imaging and Histologic Assessment over 28 Days.

Authors:  Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Francois Cornelis; Thomas Wimmer; Sebastien Monette; Simon Y Kimm; Majid Maybody; Stephen B Solomon; Jonathan A Coleman; Jeremy C Durack
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Ablation of colorectal liver metastases by irreversible electroporation: results of the COLDFIRE-I ablate-and-resect study.

Authors:  H J Scheffer; K Nielsen; A A J M van Tilborg; J M Vieveen; R A Bouwman; G Kazemier; H W M Niessen; S Meijer; C van Kuijk; M P van den Tol; M R Meijerink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Tumor ablation: common modalities and general practices.

Authors:  Erica M Knavel; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.