OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in measuring the trabecular bone microstructure, in comparison with micro-CT. The subobjective was to examine to what extent bone quality assessment is influenced by X-ray tube current and voltage settings as well as soft tissue surrounding the bone. METHODS: Eight human mandibular bone samples were scanned using three different clinical exposure protocol within water (W1-3) and without water (NW1-3) by a high-resolution (80 µm) CBCT machine (3D Accuitomo 170(®); Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Subsequently, the samples underwent micro-CT scanning (SkyScan 1174®; SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium). After image acquisition, similar volumes of interest of the trabecular structures captured with CBCT and micro-CT were aligned with each other. Segmentation was then performed, and the morphometric parameters were quantified within the volumes of interest by CTAn software (CTAnalyser(®); SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium). Descriptive statistical analyses and multiple comparisons between all protocols were applied in R software. RESULTS: High positive Pearson's correlation coefficients were observed between CBCT and micro-CT protocols for all tested morphometric indices except for trabecular thickness. No significant differences were observed between all exposure protocols except for trabecular separation. When examining the soft-tissue effect on trabecular bone structures, no significant differences between NW (1-3) and W (1-3) protocols were observed for all variables. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated the potential of high-resolution CBCT imaging for in vivo applications of quantitative bone morphometry and bone quality assessment. However, the overestimation of morphometric parameters and acquisition settings in CBCT must be taken into account.
OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in measuring the trabecular bone microstructure, in comparison with micro-CT. The subobjective was to examine to what extent bone quality assessment is influenced by X-ray tube current and voltage settings as well as soft tissue surrounding the bone. METHODS: Eight human mandibular bone samples were scanned using three different clinical exposure protocol within water (W1-3) and without water (NW1-3) by a high-resolution (80 µm) CBCT machine (3D Accuitomo 170(®); Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Subsequently, the samples underwent micro-CT scanning (SkyScan 1174®; SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium). After image acquisition, similar volumes of interest of the trabecular structures captured with CBCT and micro-CT were aligned with each other. Segmentation was then performed, and the morphometric parameters were quantified within the volumes of interest by CTAn software (CTAnalyser(®); SkyScan, Antwerp, Belgium). Descriptive statistical analyses and multiple comparisons between all protocols were applied in R software. RESULTS: High positive Pearson's correlation coefficients were observed between CBCT and micro-CT protocols for all tested morphometric indices except for trabecular thickness. No significant differences were observed between all exposure protocols except for trabecular separation. When examining the soft-tissue effect on trabecular bone structures, no significant differences between NW (1-3) and W (1-3) protocols were observed for all variables. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated the potential of high-resolution CBCT imaging for in vivo applications of quantitative bone morphometry and bone quality assessment. However, the overestimation of morphometric parameters and acquisition settings in CBCT must be taken into account.
Entities:
Keywords:
bone architecture; cone beam CT; micro-computed tomography; quantitative bone morphometry
Authors: Mary L Bouxsein; Stephen K Boyd; Blaine A Christiansen; Robert E Guldberg; Karl J Jepsen; Ralph Müller Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Qian Cao; Alejandro Sisniega; Michael Brehler; J Webster Stayman; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Vimort; Antonio Ruellas; Jack Prothero; J S Marron; Matthew McCormick; Lucia Cevidanes; Erika Benavides; Beatriz Paniagua Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2018-03-12