Literature DB >> 23824970

Exegeses on maximum genetic differentiation.

François Rousset1.   

Abstract

A canon of population genetics concerns the properties of FST, a descriptor of spatial genetic structure. Interest for FST arose from Wright's early insights linking FST to dispersal parameters as well as to his concept of effective population size (e.g., Wright 1938, 1951). Although there is continued interest in this topic, FST also serves in other applications, such as detecting selected markers in natural populations (Beaumont and Nichols 1996) and more often in routine descriptive works. Remarkably, it is the latter use that seems to attract most discussion. Alternative descriptors have been proposed. Conversely, attempts have been made to draw biological inferences from FST properties that do not depend on biological processes. A reconsideration of its properties under biological scenarios underlines the weaknesses of such approaches.

Keywords:  gene diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824970      PMCID: PMC3697963          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.152132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study.

Authors:  F Balloux; H Brünner; N Lugon-Moulin; J Hausser; J Goudet
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Influence of mutational and sampling factors on the estimation of demographic parameters in a "continuous" population under isolation by distance.

Authors:  Raphaël Leblois; Arnaud Estoup; François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

6.  A standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation.

Authors:  Lou Jost
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  G'ST and D do not replace FST.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  A genomewide comparison of population structure at STRPs and nearby SNPs in humans.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Peicheng Jing
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The relationship between F(ST) and the frequency of the most frequent allele.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Highly polymorphic mitochondrial DNA and deceiving haplotypic differentiation: implications for assessing population genetic differentiation and connectivity.

Authors:  S Fourdrilis; T Backeljau
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Mathematical constraints on FST: multiallelic markers in arbitrarily many populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  BRIP1 coding variants are associated with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in patients with HCV- or HBV-related liver disease.

Authors:  Abderrahim Oussalah; Patrice Hodonou Avogbe; Erwan Guyot; Céline Chery; Rosa-Maria Guéant-Rodriguez; Nathalie Ganne-Carrié; Aurélie Cobat; Darius Moradpour; Bertrand Nalpas; Francesco Negro; Thierry Poynard; Stanislas Pol; Pierre-Yves Bochud; Laurent Abel; Hélène Jeulin; Evelyne Schvoerer; Nicodème Chabi; Emile Amouzou; Ambaliou Sanni; Hélène Barraud; Pierre Rouyer; Thomas Josse; Laetitia Goffinet; Jean-Louis Jouve; Anne Minello; Claire Bonithon-Kopp; Gérard Thiefin; Vincent Di Martino; Michel Doffoël; Carine Richou; Jean-Jacques Raab; Patrick Hillon; Jean-Pierre Bronowicki; Jean-Louis Guéant
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.