Literature DB >> 19289600

A genomewide comparison of population structure at STRPs and nearby SNPs in humans.

Bret A Payseur1, Peicheng Jing.   

Abstract

Patterns of population structure provide insights into evolutionary processes and help identify groups of individuals for genotype-phenotype association studies. With increasing availability of polymorphic molecular markers across genomes, the examination of population structure using large numbers of unlinked loci has become a common practice in evolutionary biology and human genetics. The two classes of molecular variation most widely used for this purpose, short tandem repeat polymorphisms (STRPs) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), differ in mutational properties expected to affect population structure. To measure the relative ability of these loci to describe population structure, we compared diversity at neighboring STRPs and SNPs from 720 genomic regions in the four populations that comprise the Human HapMap. Comparing loci from the same genomic regions allowed us to focus on the contribution of mutational differences (rather than variation in genealogical history) to disparities in population structure between STRPs and SNPs. Relative to average values for SNPs from the same regions, STRPs had lower F(st), but higher G(st)' and I(n) values. STRP-SNP correlations in population structure across genomic regions were statistically significant but weak in magnitude. Separate analyses by repeat type showed that these correlations were driven primarily by tetranucleotide and trinucleotide STRPs; measures of population structure at dinucleotides and SNPs were not significantly correlated. Pairwise comparisons among populations revealed effects of divergence time on differences in population structure between STRPs and SNPs. Collectively, these results confirm that individual STRPs can provide more information about population structure than individual SNPs, but suggest that the difference in structure at STRPs and SNPs depends on local genealogical history. Our study motivates theoretical comparisons of population structure at loci with different mutational properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289600      PMCID: PMC2727377          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  64 in total

1.  A genome scan to detect candidate regions influenced by local natural selection in human populations.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Silke Brauer; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Genetic structure of human populations.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Using nuclear haplotypes with microsatellites to study gene flow between recently separated Cichlid species.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Yong-Jin Won; Arjun Sivasundar; Rasmus Nielsen; Jeffrey A Markert
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Effect of mutation on genetic differentiation among nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Nils Ryman; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  How accurate is the current picture of human genetic variation?

Authors:  I G Romero; A Manica; J Goudet; L L Handley; F Balloux
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Mutation of human short tandem repeats.

Authors:  J L Weber; C Wong
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Dennis G Ballinger; David R Cox; David A Hinds; Laura L Stuve; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Andrew Boudreau; Paul Hardenbol; Suzanne M Leal; Shiran Pasternak; David A Wheeler; Thomas D Willis; Fuli Yu; Huanming Yang; Changqing Zeng; Yang Gao; Haoran Hu; Weitao Hu; Chaohua Li; Wei Lin; Siqi Liu; Hao Pan; Xiaoli Tang; Jian Wang; Wei Wang; Jun Yu; Bo Zhang; Qingrun Zhang; Hongbin Zhao; Hui Zhao; Jun Zhou; Stacey B Gabriel; Rachel Barry; Brendan Blumenstiel; Amy Camargo; Matthew Defelice; Maura Faggart; Mary Goyette; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Huy Nguyen; Robert C Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Jessica Roy; Erich Stahl; Ellen Winchester; Liuda Ziaugra; David Altshuler; Yan Shen; Zhijian Yao; Wei Huang; Xun Chu; Yungang He; Li Jin; Yangfan Liu; Yayun Shen; Weiwei Sun; Haifeng Wang; Yi Wang; Ying Wang; Xiaoyan Xiong; Liang Xu; Mary M Y Waye; Stephen K W Tsui; Hong Xue; J Tze-Fei Wong; Luana M Galver; Jian-Bing Fan; Kevin Gunderson; Sarah S Murray; Arnold R Oliphant; Mark S Chee; Alexandre Montpetit; Fanny Chagnon; Vincent Ferretti; Martin Leboeuf; Jean-François Olivier; Michael S Phillips; Stéphanie Roumy; Clémentine Sallée; Andrei Verner; Thomas J Hudson; Pui-Yan Kwok; Dongmei Cai; Daniel C Koboldt; Raymond D Miller; Ludmila Pawlikowska; Patricia Taillon-Miller; Ming Xiao; Lap-Chee Tsui; William Mak; You Qiang Song; Paul K H Tam; Yusuke Nakamura; Takahisa Kawaguchi; Takuya Kitamoto; Takashi Morizono; Atsushi Nagashima; Yozo Ohnishi; Akihiro Sekine; Toshihiro Tanaka; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Panos Deloukas; Christine P Bird; Marcos Delgado; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Rhian Gwilliam; Sarah Hunt; Jonathan Morrison; Don Powell; Barbara E Stranger; Pamela Whittaker; David R Bentley; Mark J Daly; Paul I W de Bakker; Jeff Barrett; Yves R Chretien; Julian Maller; Steve McCarroll; Nick Patterson; Itsik Pe'er; Alkes Price; Shaun Purcell; Daniel J Richter; Pardis Sabeti; Richa Saxena; Stephen F Schaffner; Pak C Sham; Patrick Varilly; David Altshuler; Lincoln D Stein; Lalitha Krishnan; Albert Vernon Smith; Marcela K Tello-Ruiz; Gudmundur A Thorisson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Peter E Chen; David J Cutler; Carl S Kashuk; Shin Lin; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Weihua Guan; Yun Li; Heather M Munro; Zhaohui Steve Qin; Daryl J Thomas; Gilean McVean; Adam Auton; Leonardo Bottolo; Niall Cardin; Susana Eyheramendy; Colin Freeman; Jonathan Marchini; Simon Myers; Chris Spencer; Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly; Lon R Cardon; Geraldine Clarke; David M Evans; Andrew P Morris; Bruce S Weir; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; James C Mullikin; Stephen T Sherry; Michael Feolo; Andrew Skol; Houcan Zhang; Changqing Zeng; Hui Zhao; Ichiro Matsuda; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl R Macer; Eiko Suda; Charles N Rotimi; Clement A Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Patricia A Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Charmaine D M Royal; Mark F Leppert; Missy Dixon; Andy Peiffer; Renzong Qiu; Alastair Kent; Kazuto Kato; Norio Niikawa; Isaac F Adewole; Bartha M Knoppers; Morris W Foster; Ellen Wright Clayton; Jessica Watkin; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Donna Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; David A Wheeler; Imtaz Yakub; Stacey B Gabriel; Robert C Onofrio; Daniel J Richter; Liuda Ziaugra; Bruce W Birren; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler; Richard K Wilson; Lucinda L Fulton; Jane Rogers; John Burton; Nigel P Carter; Christopher M Clee; Mark Griffiths; Matthew C Jones; Kirsten McLay; Robert W Plumb; Mark T Ross; Sarah K Sims; David L Willey; Zhu Chen; Hua Han; Le Kang; Martin Godbout; John C Wallenburg; Paul L'Archevêque; Guy Bellemare; Koji Saeki; Hongguang Wang; Daochang An; Hongbo Fu; Qing Li; Zhen Wang; Renwu Wang; Arthur L Holden; Lisa D Brooks; Jean E McEwen; Mark S Guyer; Vivian Ota Wang; Jane L Peterson; Michael Shi; Jack Spiegel; Lawrence M Sung; Lynn F Zacharia; Francis S Collins; Karen Kennedy; Ruth Jamieson; John Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  STRP screening sets for the human genome at 5 cM density.

Authors:  Nader Ghebranious; David Vaske; Adong Yu; Chengfeng Zhao; Gabor Marth; James L Weber
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  12 in total

1.  Linking short tandem repeat polymorphisms with cytosine modifications in human lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Zhou Zhang; Yinan Zheng; Xu Zhang; Cong Liu; Brian Thomas Joyce; Warren A Kibbe; Lifang Hou; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Evolution of Nine Microsatellite Loci in the Fungus Fusarium oxysporum.

Authors:  Jill E Demers; María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Exegeses on maximum genetic differentiation.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A genomic portrait of human microsatellite variation.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Peicheng Jing; Ryan J Haasl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Genome wide screen identifies microsatellite markers associated with acute adverse effects following radiotherapy in cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuichi Michikawa; Tomo Suga; Atsuko Ishikawa; Hideki Hayashi; Akira Oka; Hidetoshi Inoko; Mayumi Iwakawa; Takashi Imai
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  Genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in Chinese bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) revealed by SSR markers.

Authors:  Chenyang Hao; Lanfen Wang; Hongmei Ge; Yuchen Dong; Xueyong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gene-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers for genetic and association mapping in common bean.

Authors:  Carlos H Galeano; Andrés J Cortés; Andrea C Fernández; Álvaro Soler; Natalia Franco-Herrera; Godwill Makunde; Jos Vanderleyden; Matthew W Blair
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Sequence differences at orthologous microsatellites inflate estimates of human-chimpanzee differentiation.

Authors:  Michelle Kwong; Trevor J Pemberton
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Theory, practice, and conservation in the age of genomics: The Galápagos giant tortoise as a case study.

Authors:  Stephen J Gaughran; Maud C Quinzin; Joshua M Miller; Ryan C Garrick; Danielle L Edwards; Michael A Russello; Nikos Poulakakis; Claudio Ciofi; Luciano B Beheregaray; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.