Literature DB >> 23821184

Impact of official technical training for urologists on the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Atsushi Okada1, Takahiro Yasui, Kazumi Taguchi, Kazuhiro Niimi, Yasuhiko Hirose, Shuzo Hamamoto, Ryosuke Ando, Yasue Kubota, Yukihiro Umemoto, Keiichi Tozawa, Shoichi Sasaki, Yutaro Hayashi, Kenjiro Kohri.   

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of company-initiated training of urologists on shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment results, we retrospectively assessed 602 patients who underwent SWL in Nagoya City University Hospital between January 2004 and June 2011 using Lithotripter S (Dornier MedTech, Japan). Training-provided by a training specialist of the company in June 2010-focused on the targeting of renal and proximal ureter stones with a combination of radiography and ultrasonography (US). The stretcher wedges were positioned in the semi-prone position or the semi-supine position for middle and distal ureter stones, respectively. Success rates between 519 pre-training treatments and 83 post-training treatments were compared. Patient age and stone location, burden, number, and composition did not significantly differ between pre- and post-training. Training improved the overall success rate from 66.3 to 87.2 % (P < 0.0001). The mean number of SWL treatments decreased from 1.8 ± 1.8 to 1.4 ± 1.3 (P = 0.01). The first SWL treatment success rate increased from 67.1 to 83.7 % (P = 0.002), and the need for multiple treatments decreased. The frequency of detection of renal and proximal ureter stones by both radiography and US increased from 10.5 % before training to 58.2 % after training (P < 0.0001). Significant factors for successful SWL were determined to be training and prone position for distal ureter stones by multivariate analysis and ultrasonic detection for renal and proximal ureter stones by univariate analysis. Skills in targeting stones using ultrasonography and selecting the proper therapeutic position are essential for improving the success rate of stone removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821184     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0586-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  26 in total

1.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Afshar Zomorrodi; Amirreza Elahian; Nematollah Ghorbani; Anahita Tavoosi
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.510

3.  Impact of learning curve on efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Courtney Lee; Sara L Best; Roland Ugarte; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2008-09

4.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

5.  Which is more important in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of solitary renal stones: stone location or stone burden?

Authors:  Mostafa M Khalil
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Shock wave lithotripsy and diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mitra de Cógáin; Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  The effect of shock wave lithotripsy on nitric oxide and malondialdehyde levels in plasma and urine samples.

Authors:  Hülya Aksoy; Yilmaz Aksoy; Hamdullah Turhan; Sait Keleş; Tevfik Ziypak; Isa Ozbey
Journal:  Cell Biochem Funct       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution.

Authors:  Taku Abe; Koichiro Akakura; Makoto Kawaguchi; Takeshi Ueda; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Haruo Ito; Kuniyoshi Nozumi; Kazuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Shock-wave lithotripsy: variance within UK practice.

Authors:  N L Sharma; C E Alexander; E Grout; B W Turney
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  Rabindra R Watson; Mansour A Parsi; Harry R Aslanian; Adam J Goodman; David R Lichtenstein; Joshua Melson; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Rahul Pannala; Amrita Sethi; Shelby A Sullivan; Nirav C Thosani; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; John T Maple
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2018-09-26

4.  The art of shockwave lithotripsy is an endangered species and is worth saving: the perspective of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urology (YAU) Urolithiasis group.

Authors:  Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Etienne Xavier Keller; Thomas Tailly; Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy; Francesco Esperto; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Vincent de Coninck; Amelia Pietropaolo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsin Chang; Wun-Rong Lin; Wei-Kung Tsai; Pai-Kai Chiang; Marcelo Chen; Jen-Shu Tseng; Allen W Chiu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.