Literature DB >> 16190825

Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution.

Taku Abe1, Koichiro Akakura, Makoto Kawaguchi, Takeshi Ueda, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Haruo Ito, Kuniyoshi Nozumi, Kazuhiro Suzuki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the risk factors having an impact on the achievement of stone-free status and on the success rate, as well as on the likelihood of recurrence, in patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of 3023 patients (3254 renal units) with upper urinary-tract stones who underwent SWL at the Funabashi Clinic over a 13-year period. We assessed the stone-free and success rates for 2844 patients (3061 renal units) 3 months post-SWL. We also determined the recurrence rate for the 1078 patients (1139 renal units) who had achieved stone-free status at that time.
RESULTS: Overall, stone-free status was achieved in 65.1% of patients, and the success rate was 85.7%. There were significant differences in the stone-free rates depending on patient age, history of urolithiasis, and presence of pyuria before SWL, as well as the number, location, size, and composition of the stones. Stones recurred in 326 of 1139 renal units (28.6%) during a mean follow-up of 36 months. The recurrence rates were 7.5%, 24.1%, and 33.0% after 1, 3, 5 years, respectively. Multiple stones, a history of urolithiasis, and stones located in the kidney or both kidneys plus the ureter significantly influenced recurrence. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that multiple stones were most significantly related to recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with SWL has a low morbidity and high effectiveness. The number and location of stones and a history of urolithiasis significantly influence recurrence. Further studies of prophylactic therapy are required, especially for patients with these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16190825     DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  43 in total

1.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

2.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 3.  Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach.

Authors:  Ryoji Takazawa; Sachi Kitayama; Toshihiko Tsujii
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osamu Ichiyanagi; Akira Nagaoka; Takuji Izumi; Yuko Kawamura; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

6.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).

Authors:  Wenqi Wu; Zhou Yang; Fengling Tang; Changbao Xu; Youzhi Wang; Xiaojian Gu; Xuehua Chen; Rongjiang Wang; Jiaka Yan; Xiang Wang; Wenxi Gao; Chunhua Hou; Jianming Guo; Jian Zhang; Alberto Gurioli; Zhangqun Ye; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters.

Authors:  Michelle Jo Semins; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

9.  Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to stone distribution within the kidney.

Authors:  Jeong Woo Lee; Sung Yong Cho; Jae-Seung Yeon; Min Young Jeong; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Seung Bae Lee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Lim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.