Literature DB >> 27216432

Shock-wave lithotripsy: variance within UK practice.

N L Sharma1, C E Alexander2, E Grout3, B W Turney3.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to determine the current treatment policies of UK shock-wave lithotripsy centres. Fixed-site lithotripter centres in the UK were identified via the national Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU) study (n = 25). Questionnaires were completed regarding current SWL protocols for each centre, including management of anticoagulation, use of antibiotics and analgesia, urine testing, pacemakers, and arterial aneurysms. Data were collected regarding service delivery. Responses were obtained for 21 centres. Most centres use the Storz Modulith (85.7 %). Wide variation was observed in clinical contraindications to SWL, with 47.6 % centres performing SWL in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, 66.7 % performing SWL in patients with a pacemaker, and 66.7 % of centres not performing SWL in asymptomatic patients with a urine dipstick positive for nitrites and leucocytes. The management of anticoagulation pre- and post-SWL showed wide variation, with the omission of anticoagulation ranging from 0 to 10 days pre-SWL. Seventeen distinct analgesia regimens were reported and prophylactic antibiotics are routinely administered in 25.0 % of centres. Tamsulosin is prescribed to all patients in 20.0 % of centres and a further 15.0 % of centres routinely prescribe tamsulosin post-SWL of ureteric stones. The included centres undertake SWL a median of 4 days per week and treat a median of six patients per list. Emergency SWL is unavailable in 30.0 % of centres. This observational real-life study has identified a significant disparity in the delivery of SWL throughout the UK, despite high numbers of patients with renal and ureteric stones being treated with this modality. Further studies should address the key areas of controversy, including an assessment of technical training, and facilitate the development of national guidelines to ensure a high level of standardized care for SWL patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Practices; Shock-wave lithotripsy; UK

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27216432     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0886-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  25 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses.

Authors:  S B Streem; A Yost
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for shock wave lithotripsy in patients with sterile urine before treatment may be unnecessary: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Fan Tianyong; Han Ping; Liu Liangren; Yuan Haichao; Wei Qiang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Effect of alpha1-adrenergic antagonists on lower ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Huijun Wang; Ke Liu; Zhigang Ji; Hanzhong Li
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.767

Review 4.  Epidemiology of stone disease.

Authors:  Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  The necessity of prophylactic antibiotics during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; A Giftopoulos; G Koutsokalis; G Raptidis; A Kostakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Victoriano Romero; Haluk Akpinar; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

7.  A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  R John D'A Honey; Michael Ordon; Daniela Ghiculete; Joshua D Wiesenthal; Ronald Kodama; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Role of tamsulosin in clearance of upper ureteral calculi after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Singh; Devendra Singh Pawar; Mahavir Singh Griwan; Jag Mohan Indora; Sachit Sharma
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.510

9.  Tamsulosin facilitates earlier clearance of stone fragments and reduces pain after shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi: results from an open-label randomized study.

Authors:  Vineet Naja; Mayank Mohan Agarwal; Arup K Mandal; Shrawan K Singh; Ravimohan Mavuduru; Santosh Kumar; Naveen C Acharya; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?

Authors:  Suresh K Bhagat; Ninan K Chacko; Nitin S Kekre; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Belavendra Antonisamy; Antony Devasia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopic stone treatment for adults with ureteric stones: the TISU non-inferiority RCT.

Authors:  Ranan Dasgupta; Sarah Cameron; Lorna Aucott; Graeme MacLennan; Mary M Kilonzo; Thomas Bl Lam; Ruth Thomas; John Norrie; Alison McDonald; Ken Anson; James N'Dow; Neil Burgess; Charles T Clark; Francis X Keeley; Sara J MacLennan; Kath Starr; Samuel McClinton
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Efficacy of pethidine, ketorolac, and lidocaine gel as analgesics for pain control in shockwave lithotripsy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abdelwahab Hashem; Fady K Ghobrial; M A Elbaset; Ahmed M Atwa; Mohamed Fadallah; Mahmoud Laymon; Ahmed El-Assmy; Khaled Z Sheir; Hassan Abol-Enein
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-05-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.