Literature DB >> 18796563

Impact of learning curve on efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Courtney Lee1, Sara L Best, Roland Ugarte, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a radiographer's learning curve on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) efficacy.
METHODS: Five registered technologists who were certified to assist in SWL procedures but had no prior lithotripter experience were evaluated during a 4-year period. Stone-free (no residual fragments on plain radiographic imaging), re-treatment and post-SWL procedure rates were evaluated for the first 3 years of radiographer employment.
RESULTS: The overall stone-free rate increased from 55% (efficiency quotient [EQ] 45) in the first year to 68% (EQ 50) in the third year. The treatment success rate for the lower calyx increased from 50% (EQ 41) in the first year to 62% (EQ 44) in the third year. There was no difference in re-treatment or post-SWL procedure rates.
CONCLUSION: Efficacy with SWL, as measured by stone-free rates, improved with increasing experience of the radiographer. Ongoing supervision and mentorship might be helpful in the first year of service.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18796563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Technol        ISSN: 0033-8397


  5 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Impact of official technical training for urologists on the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Atsushi Okada; Takahiro Yasui; Kazumi Taguchi; Kazuhiro Niimi; Yasuhiko Hirose; Shuzo Hamamoto; Ryosuke Ando; Yasue Kubota; Yukihiro Umemoto; Keiichi Tozawa; Shoichi Sasaki; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsin Chang; Wun-Rong Lin; Wei-Kung Tsai; Pai-Kai Chiang; Marcelo Chen; Jen-Shu Tseng; Allen W Chiu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.