Literature DB >> 23818125

Extent of lymphadenectomy does not predict survival in patients treated with primary esophagectomy.

Joyce Wong1, Jill Weber, Khaldoun Almhanna, Sarah Hoffe, Ravi Shridhar, Richard Karl, Kenneth L Meredith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of lymph nodes resected and its impact on survival for patients with esophageal cancer remains undefined. Current guidelines recommend extended lymphadenectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We reviewed our single institutional experience with nodal harvest for esophageal cancer in a non-neoadjuvant therapy setting.
METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy as primary therapy were indentified from a prospectively maintained database consisting of 704 patients who underwent esophagectomy. Patients were stratified by number of lymph nodes (LN) resected: >5, 10, 12, 15, or 20. Survival, clinical, and pathologic parameters were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate.
RESULTS: We identified 246 patients who underwent esophagectomy as initial treatment. The mean age was 65 ±10 years. The majority of patients were male (87%). Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed for 71%, minimally invasive esophagectomy for 15%, transhiatal esophagectomy for 12%, and three-field esophagectomy for 2%. At 60 months follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with < vs. >5 LN resected (p = 0.74 and p = 0.67, respectively) or in the < vs. >10 (p = 0.33, p = 0.11), 12 (p = 0.82, p = 0.90), 15 (p = 0.45, p = 0.79), or 20 (p = 0.72, p = 0.86) resected LN groups. Patients were then subdivided into node-positive and node-negative cohorts and stratified by nodal harvest. In the subgroups of patients with node-negative and node-positive disease, OS and DFS also did not significantly differ between groups with respect to number of nodes resected (p > 0.05). A total of 49 (20%) patients developed recurrent disease; however, recurrence was not statistically associated with number of LN resected (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: We found no impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on overall or disease-free survival in patients treated with esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the number of nodes resected at esophagectomy did not affect recurrence rates. Current recommendations for increased nodal resection during esophagectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy may not improve patient outcomes, and this phenomenon warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818125     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: extended or regional lymphadenectomy?

Authors:  Brechtje A Grotenhuis; M van Heijl; J Zehetner; J Moons; B P L Wijnhoven; M I van Berge Henegouwen; H W Tilanus; T R DeMeester; T Lerut; J J B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  How radical should surgery be for early esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Dean Bogoevski; Maximilian Bockhorn; Alexandra Koenig; Matthias Reeh; Katharina von Loga; Guido Sauter; Thomas Rösch; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Long-term outcome of 2920 patients with cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: evaluation of the New Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/American Joint Cancer Committee staging system.

Authors:  Ralf Gertler; Hubert J Stein; Rupert Langer; Marc Nettelmann; Tibor Schuster; Heinz Hoefler; Joerg-Ruediger Siewert; Marcus Feith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Renee Desmond; Miguel R Arguedas; Carolyn E Reed; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Short and long-term advantages of transhiatal and transthoracic oesophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  J M T Omloo; S Y K Law; B Launois; E Le Prisé; J Wong; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J J B van Lanschot
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander J Greenstein; Virginia R Litle; Scott J Swanson; Celia M Divino; Stuart Packer; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nasser K Altorki; Xi Kathy Zhou; Brendon Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Subroto Paul; Paul C Lee; Madhu Mazumdar
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration.

Authors:  T W Rice; V W Rusch; C Apperson-Hansen; M S Allen; L-Q Chen; J G Hunter; K A Kesler; S Law; T E M R Lerut; C E Reed; J A Salo; W J Scott; S G Swisher; T J Watson; E H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas W Rice; Long-Qi Chen; Paul H Schipper; Kenneth A Kesler; Simon Law; Toni E M R Lerut; Carolyn E Reed; Jarmo A Salo; Walter J Scott; Wayne L Hofstetter; Thomas J Watson; Mark S Allen; Valerie W Rusch; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of right upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy in Sweet procedure for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wang; Han-Yu Deng; Yang Hu; Yong Yuan; Wen-Ping Wang; Yun-Cang Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Left thoracotomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma: still Sweet enough?

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wang; Wen-Ping Wang; Yong Yuan; Yang Hu; Jun Peng; Yun-Cang Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Norihisa Uemura; Tadashi Kondo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer : Evolution of management and prognosis over the last 3 decades].

Authors:  T Glatz; G Marjanovic; K Zirlik; T Brunner; U T Hopt; F Makowiec; J Hoeppner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Satoru Matsuda; Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparison of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy for the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Nan Wu; Shi Yan; Xing Wang; Yue Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Examined lymph node count is not associated with prognosis in elderly patients with pN0 thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Guoqing Zhang; Xiaofeng Guo; Lulu Yuan; Zhen Gao; Jindong Li; Xiangnan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Zheng; Shi-Cong Li; Chao Lu; Wei-Ming Zhang; Jian-Bin Hou; Ke-Feng Shi; Peng Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 9.  Involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: theory and practice.

Authors:  Minghuan Li; Xiaoli Zhang; Fen Zhao; Yijun Luo; Li Kong; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Right Compared With Left Thoracic Approach Esophagectomy for Patients With Middle Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Yin Li; Xianben Liu; Ruixiang Zhang; Haibo Sun; Wenqun Xing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.