Literature DB >> 18224663

Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.

Alexander J Greenstein1, Virginia R Litle, Scott J Swanson, Celia M Divino, Stuart Packer, Juan P Wisnivesky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node (LN) metastases in esophageal cancer has important prognostic and treatment implications. However, the optimal number of LNs that should be examined for accurate staging is controversial. In the current study, the association between survival and the number of LNs evaluated was examined in patients who underwent resection of lymph node-negative (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] TNM stage I-IIA) esophageal cancer.
METHODS: All patients were identified who underwent surgery for lymph node-negative esophageal cancer between 1988 and 2003 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. Patients were classified into 3 groups by the number of negative LNs sampled during surgery (<or=10 LNs, 11-17 LNs, and>or=18 LNs). Esophageal cancer-specific survival was compared among these LN groups using Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between survival and the number of negative LNs after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 972 patients were included in the study. Disease-specific survival rates increased with a higher number of negative LNs. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 55% among patients with<or=10 negative LNs, compared with 66% and 75%, respectively, for those with 11 to 17 negative LNs and>or=18 negative LNs. The number of negative LNs was found to be significantly associated with survival in analyses stratified by tumor status. On multivariate regression controlling for age, race/ethnicity, sex, histology, tumor status, and postoperative radiotherapy, a higher number of negative LNs was found to be independently associated with higher disease-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LN metastases in patients with esophageal cancer appears to have important prognostic and treatment implications. Data from the current study suggest that patients undergoing surgical resection for esophageal cancer should have at least 18 LNs removed. Copyright (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18224663     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  65 in total

1.  The impact of operative approaches on outcomes of middle and lower third esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ju-Wei Mu; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yu-Shun Gao; Jin-Feng Huang; Jie He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Lymph nodes are important.

Authors:  Paul Schipper
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Adjuvant radiation therapy and lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Jill Weber; Sarah E Hoffe; Khaldoun Almhanna; Richard Karl; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement and the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

Authors:  Leila Sisic; Susanne Blank; Wilko Weichert; Dirk Jäger; Christoph Springfeld; Marcel Hochreiter; Markus Büchler; Katja Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The Number of Harvested LNs Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Lymph Node Metastasis-negative Patients Who Received Curative Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Yosuke Atsumi; Shinnosuke Kawahara; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Ayako Tamagawa; Yukio Maezawa; Kazuki Kano; Masaaki Murakawa; Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Takashi Oshima; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Negative lymph node at station 108 is a strong predictor of overall survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jinling Zhang; Xueyuan Heng; Yi Luo; Luning Li; Haiyan Zhang; Fengyuan Che; Baosheng Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Patterns of surveillance following curative intent therapy for gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Renata D Peixoto; Howard J Lim; Haerin Kim; Ahmad Abdullah; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-09

8.  Comparative Quantitative Lymph Node Assessment in Localized Esophageal Cancer Patients After R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Michael J Pucci; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans; Hanna Meidl; Casey Lamb; Daniel Levine; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: assessing tumor angiogenesis using multi-slice CT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Tao Song; Yu-Guang Shen; Na-Na Jiao; Xin-Hui Li; Hong-Tao Hu; Jin-Rong Qu; Xue-Jun Chen; Wen Feng; Xun Zhang; Hai-Liang Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.