BACKGROUND: An increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma, a modified surgical strategy and the increasing use of multimodal therapeutic protocols have had a major impact on the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer during the last 3 decades. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the development of these factors and their impact on the short and long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer over the last 25 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 366 patients with esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy at the University Hospital in Freiburg from 1988 to 2012. The study period was split into four time periods for further comparisons, i.e. 1988-1994, 1995-2001, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012. RESULTS: Within the time periods analyzed a marked increase in adenocarcinoma was found (time periods1988-1994, 1995-2001, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012: 21%, 37%, 61% and 64%, respectively, p<0.001). The initially commonly used transhiatal approach and reconstruction with cervical anastomosis was gradually replaced by the thoracoabdominal procedure with intrathoracic reconstruction (i.e. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, 2007-2012: 98 %). During the study period increasingly more patients received multimodal therapy (13%, 85%, 72% and 84%, p<0.001), the overall rate of perioperative complications (70%, 88%, 73% and 56%, p<0.001) and perioperative mortality (16%, 18%, 8% and 2.5%, p<0.001) were significantly reduced, while the overall 5-year survival (12%, 34%, 41% and 62%, p<0.001) improved. An early tumor stage (p=0.002), N0 status (p<0.001) and histological type of adenocarcinoma (p=0.011) were identified as independent predictors of improved survival. CONCLUSION: During the period from 1988 to 2012 a significant improvement of long-term survival as well as a marked reduction of perioperative mortality after esophagectomy were observed. The improved outcome was associated with an increased use of multimodal therapeutic protocols, the preferred use of thoracoabdominal esophagectomy and epidemiological changes in histology over the study period.
BACKGROUND: An increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma, a modified surgical strategy and the increasing use of multimodal therapeutic protocols have had a major impact on the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer during the last 3 decades. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the development of these factors and their impact on the short and long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer over the last 25 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 366 patients with esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy at the University Hospital in Freiburg from 1988 to 2012. The study period was split into four time periods for further comparisons, i.e. 1988-1994, 1995-2001, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012. RESULTS: Within the time periods analyzed a marked increase in adenocarcinoma was found (time periods1988-1994, 1995-2001, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012: 21%, 37%, 61% and 64%, respectively, p<0.001). The initially commonly used transhiatal approach and reconstruction with cervical anastomosis was gradually replaced by the thoracoabdominal procedure with intrathoracic reconstruction (i.e. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, 2007-2012: 98 %). During the study period increasingly more patients received multimodal therapy (13%, 85%, 72% and 84%, p<0.001), the overall rate of perioperative complications (70%, 88%, 73% and 56%, p<0.001) and perioperative mortality (16%, 18%, 8% and 2.5%, p<0.001) were significantly reduced, while the overall 5-year survival (12%, 34%, 41% and 62%, p<0.001) improved. An early tumor stage (p=0.002), N0 status (p<0.001) and histological type of adenocarcinoma (p=0.011) were identified as independent predictors of improved survival. CONCLUSION: During the period from 1988 to 2012 a significant improvement of long-term survival as well as a marked reduction of perioperative mortality after esophagectomy were observed. The improved outcome was associated with an increased use of multimodal therapeutic protocols, the preferred use of thoracoabdominal esophagectomy and epidemiological changes in histology over the study period.
Authors: Giuseppe Portale; Jeffrey A Hagen; Jeffrey H Peters; Linda S Chan; Steven R DeMeester; Tasha A K Gandamihardja; Tom R DeMeester Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Bryan H Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; Val Gebski; Lara Fitzgerald; R John Simes; Peter Devitt; Stephen Ackland; David C Gotley; David Joseph; Jeremy Millar; John North; Euan T Walpole; James W Denham Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jingya Wang; Caimiao Wei; Susan L Tucker; Bevan Myles; Matthew Palmer; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Steven H Lin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Adrian Culetto; Jean-Michel Gonzalez; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Pablo Miranda Garcia; Juan Ignacio Tellechea; Emmanuelle Garnier; Stephane Berdah; Marc Barthet Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2017-05-31