Literature DB >> 28149557

Prognostic value of right upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy in Sweet procedure for esophageal cancer.

Zhi-Qiang Wang1, Han-Yu Deng2, Yang Hu2, Yong Yuan2, Wen-Ping Wang2, Yun-Cang Wang2, Long-Qi Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the right upper mediastinal lymph node dissection (RUMLND) for patients with middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC-MLT) is still not well established yet. Our objective is to evaluate the prognostic role of the Sweet procedure plus right upper mediastinal lymph node dissection (MS) by comparing with the Sweet procedure with standard lymph node dissection (SS) in terms of long-term survival.
METHODS: Totally 1,477 ESCC-MLT patients underwent radical intent surgery (186 with MS, 1,291 with SS) at our department between January 2007 and September 2013. After propensity score matching (PSM), 186 patients from each group were matched and analyzed. The 5-year survival rates in two groups were compared by detailed stratifications in terms of clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: As for the prognostic role of RUMLND, patients treated with MS tended to obtain higher 5-year survival rate than patients treated with SS in univariate analysis (48.1% vs. 37.4%). Moreover, in multivariate analysis, MS yielded significant higher 5-year survival rate compared with SS (P=0.041). In addition, subgroup analyses of the survival between the MS and SS patients by detailed stratifications demonstrated the survival superiority in the MS group with age <60 years old, TNM stage III, number of lymph node dissection (LND) ≥15, as well as no using of postoperative adjuvant treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The RUMLND in Sweet procedure is an independent prognostic factor for ESCC-MLT patients, especially for those with thoracic middle segment-located tumor, stage III or younger.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); lymphadenectomy; prognosis; sweet

Year:  2016        PMID: 28149557      PMCID: PMC5227229          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  22 in total

1.  What should be the gold standard for the surgical component in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Asad Kutup; Michael F Nentwich; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Dean Bogoevski; Jakob R Izbicki; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Role of right upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after tri-incisional esophagectomies.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Chih-Cheng Hsieh; Yu-Chung Wu; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Treatment and outcome of young patients with esophageal cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anna M J van Nistelrooij; Liza N van Steenbergen; Manon C W Spaander; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot; Valery E P P Lemmens; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Surgical resection strategy and the influence of radicality on outcomes in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  A R Davies; H Sandhu; A Pillai; P Sinha; F Mattsson; M J Forshaw; J A Gossage; J Lagergren; W H Allum; R C Mason
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Oesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?

Authors:  C Mariette; G Piessen
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Extent of lymphadenectomy does not predict survival in patients treated with primary esophagectomy.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Jill Weber; Khaldoun Almhanna; Sarah Hoffe; Ravi Shridhar; Richard Karl; Kenneth L Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Rafael M Laurino Neto; Marco E Allaix; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Three-field transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma esophagus-a single--center experience with a review of literature.

Authors:  Sivaram Ganesamoni; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

9.  Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas W Rice; Long-Qi Chen; Paul H Schipper; Kenneth A Kesler; Simon Law; Toni E M R Lerut; Carolyn E Reed; Jarmo A Salo; Walter J Scott; Wayne L Hofstetter; Thomas J Watson; Mark S Allen; Valerie W Rusch; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition).

Authors:  Hui Li; Wentao Fang; Zhentao Yu; Yousheng Mao; Longqi Chen; Jie He; Tiehua Rong; Chun Chen; Haiquan Chen; Keneng Chen; Ming Du; Yongtao Han; Jian Hu; Jianhua Fu; Xiaobin Hou; Taiqian Gong; Yin Li; Junfeng Liu; Shuoyan Liu; Lijie Tan; Hui Tian; Qun Wang; Jiaqing Xiang; Meiqing Xu; Xin Ye; Bin You; Renquan Zhang; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Development and validation of nomograms to intraoperatively predict metastatic patterns in regional lymph nodes in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Fei Zhao; Rong-Xin Lu; Jin-Yuan Liu; Jun Fan; Hao-Ran Lin; Xiao-Yu Yang; Shu-Hui You; Qian-Ge Wu; Xue-Yun Qin; Yi Liu; Fu-Xi Zhen; Jin-Hua Luo; Wei Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy combined with left inferior pulmonary ligament lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma via the right thoracic approach: A single-center retrospective study of 30 cases.

Authors:  Shijie Huang; Tianbao Yang; Wu Wang; Guozhong Huang; Boyang Chen; Pengfei Chen; Douli Ke; Wenhua Huang; Jinbiao Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.