INTRODUCTION: Radical esophagectomy is considered the standard therapy for tumors that infiltrate the submucosa of the esophagus (T1b), as the prevalence of lymph node metastases has been reported in up to 40% of these patients. It remains unclear whether radical esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is needed or whether a surgical procedure with only regional lymphadenectomy suffices. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for T1b cancer through a transthoracic approach with extended lymphadenectomy (TTE) with those of patients in whom transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) was performed with a regional lymph node dissection. METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for T1b cancer between 1990 and 2004 and who did not receive (neo)adjuvant therapy were included. Data were collected from prospective databases of 4 centers. In Leuven, Belgium (n = 101), and Los Angeles, CA (n = 31), patients with T1b tumors had been operated on via TTE with extended lymphadenectomy, whereas in Amsterdam (n = 43) and Rotterdam (n = 47), the Netherlands, THE with regional lymphadenectomy had been performed. RESULTS: The 2 patient groups (TTE, n = 132; THE, n = 90) were comparable with regard to age, body mass index, and ASA classification. Operative time was longer in patients who underwent TTE (390 minutes) versus THE (250 minutes) (P < 0.001). The yield of lymph nodes resected was higher in the TTE group (median: 32) versus THE (median: 10) (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were comparable between both the groups. In the TTE group, 27.3% of complications were classified as major versus 14.4% in the THE group (P < 0.001); however, the reoperation rate was higher after THE (12.2%) versus TTE (3.8%) (P = 0.01). There was no difference in pathological outcomes (infiltration depth, pN stage, pM stage, positive lymph node ratio) between both groups. Overall, 5-year survival (63.4% TTE vs 69.4% THE; P = 0.55) and disease-free 5-year survival (76.9% TTE vs 78.3% THE; P = 0.65) were comparable between both the groups. In patients with N1 disease, disease-free 5-year survival was 49.8% in the TTE group versus 40.0% in the THE group (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with submucosal esophageal cancer (T1b), TTE with extended lymphadenectomy and THE with regional lymphadenectomy had similar short-term outcome and long-term survival. In the selected group of T1bN1 patients, TTE may be the preferred operative technique because of a potential disease-free survival benefit; in patients with T1bN0 disease, THE with en bloc dissection of the esophagus and regional lymph nodes offers an oncologically safe and less invasive treatment.
INTRODUCTION: Radical esophagectomy is considered the standard therapy for tumors that infiltrate the submucosa of the esophagus (T1b), as the prevalence of lymph node metastases has been reported in up to 40% of these patients. It remains unclear whether radical esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is needed or whether a surgical procedure with only regional lymphadenectomy suffices. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for T1b cancer through a transthoracic approach with extended lymphadenectomy (TTE) with those of patients in whom transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) was performed with a regional lymph node dissection. METHODS:Patients who underwent esophagectomy for T1b cancer between 1990 and 2004 and who did not receive (neo)adjuvant therapy were included. Data were collected from prospective databases of 4 centers. In Leuven, Belgium (n = 101), and Los Angeles, CA (n = 31), patients with T1b tumors had been operated on via TTE with extended lymphadenectomy, whereas in Amsterdam (n = 43) and Rotterdam (n = 47), the Netherlands, THE with regional lymphadenectomy had been performed. RESULTS: The 2 patient groups (TTE, n = 132; THE, n = 90) were comparable with regard to age, body mass index, and ASA classification. Operative time was longer in patients who underwent TTE (390 minutes) versus THE (250 minutes) (P < 0.001). The yield of lymph nodes resected was higher in the TTE group (median: 32) versus THE (median: 10) (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were comparable between both the groups. In the TTE group, 27.3% of complications were classified as major versus 14.4% in the THE group (P < 0.001); however, the reoperation rate was higher after THE (12.2%) versus TTE (3.8%) (P = 0.01). There was no difference in pathological outcomes (infiltration depth, pN stage, pM stage, positive lymph node ratio) between both groups. Overall, 5-year survival (63.4% TTE vs 69.4% THE; P = 0.55) and disease-free 5-year survival (76.9% TTE vs 78.3% THE; P = 0.65) were comparable between both the groups. In patients with N1 disease, disease-free 5-year survival was 49.8% in the TTE group versus 40.0% in the THE group (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with submucosal esophageal cancer (T1b), TTE with extended lymphadenectomy and THE with regional lymphadenectomy had similar short-term outcome and long-term survival. In the selected group of T1bN1 patients, TTE may be the preferred operative technique because of a potential disease-free survival benefit; in patients with T1bN0 disease, THE with en bloc dissection of the esophagus and regional lymph nodes offers an oncologically safe and less invasive treatment.