Literature DB >> 28690461

Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Registry: 2-Year Outcomes Suggest Low Revision and Return to OR Rates.

Moira McCarthy1, Katherine Mallett1, Matthew Abola2, Sherrie Vassallo1, Joseph Nguyen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most common knee injuries. Patient outcomes, rate of subsequent operations, and rate of subsequent ACL reconstruction following primary ACL reconstruction need to be evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study was designed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the return to surgery (OR) rate following primary ACL reconstruction and (2) what is the revision ACL reconstruction rate?
METHODS: Data was drawn from the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) ACL Registry. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation, Lysholm-Tegner Scales, Marx Activity Scale, and SF12 were completed by patients at baseline, 1-, and 2-year follow-up. Clinical data and intraoperative data were registered by surgeons on an intraoperative form. Subsequent surgery rates were determined by evaluating the medical records for subsequent surgery, laterality, surgeon, procedure description, and type of anesthesia.
RESULTS: The majority of the ACL reconstructions performed were autograft (76.6%) with the most common graft being bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft (47.2%), hamstring autograft (21.9%), and Achilles allograft (18.2%). Average IKDC score improved from 51.9 (SD 16.1) at baseline to 83.5 (SD 14.2) at 2-year follow-up. Females had a 2.5-point lower IKDC and 1.4-point Marx scores compared to males. Of the enrolled patients, 7.3% had revision ACL surgery with 70.4% being ipsilateral ACL surgery. Of the enrolled patients, 10.3% had subsequent knee surgery with 72.3% being ipsilateral knee surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that patients less than 18 years of age at the time of their index surgery were over three times more likely to undergo a revision ACL reconstruction compared to older patients and were at four times higher risk than older patients for any subsequent knee surgery.
CONCLUSION: Understanding ACL surgery, patient outcomes, and risk factors for revision ACL surgery and subsequent knee surgery after primary ACL reconstruction is essential. Patients less than 18 years of age have a higher risk of subsequent knee surgery and subsequent ACL surgery than older patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL Registry; anterior cruciate ligament

Year:  2016        PMID: 28690461      PMCID: PMC5481258          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-016-9532-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  22 in total

Review 1.  Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Robert A Magnussen; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Risk factors of subsequent operations after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Rick P Csintalan; Maria C S Inacio; Tadashi T Funahashi; Gregory B Maletis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Andreas Persson; Knut Fjeldsgaard; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Asle B Kjellsen; Lars Engebretsen; Randi M Hole; Jonas M Fevang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury.

Authors:  Warren R Dunn; Stephen Lyman; Andrew E Lincoln; Paul J Amoroso; Thomas Wickiewicz; Robert G Marx
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Surgical Predictors of Early Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 Patients.

Authors:  Daniel Andernord; Haukur Björnsson; Max Petzold; Bengt I Eriksson; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Hillary S Saxon; W David Hovis; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Frank Menhert; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk for Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Higher Among Adolescents: Results From the Danish Registry of Knee Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Peter Faunø; Lene Rahr-Wagner; Martin Lind
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Retreat VIII Summary Statement: An Update on Injury Risk Identification and Prevention Across the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Continuum, March 14-16, 2019, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Kenneth L Cameron; Kevin R Ford; Dustin R Grooms; Lindsey K Lepley; Gregory D Myer; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Ramp Lesions of the Medial Meniscus in Patients Undergoing Primary and Revision ACL Reconstruction: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  George C Balazs; Harry G Greditzer; Dean Wang; Niv Marom; Hollis G Potter; Robert G Marx; Scott A Rodeo; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-15

3.  Two-Year Recall Bias After ACL Reconstruction Is Affected by Clinical Result.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Randsborg; Dakota Adamec; Nicholas A Cepeda; Daphne I Ling
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Risk Factors for Early Subsequent (Revision or Contralateral) ACL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Database Study.

Authors:  Matthew C Gallo; Ioanna K Bolia; Omid Jalali; Santano Rosario; Alexis Rounds; Keemia Soraya Heidari; Nicholas A Trasolini; John P Prodromo; George Frederick Hatch; Alexander Evan Weber
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-18

5.  Patient-Reported Outcome, Return to Sport, and Revision Rates 7-9 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From a Cohort of 2042 Patients.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Randsborg; Nicholas Cepeda; Dakota Adamec; Scott A Rodeo; Anil Ranawat; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.202

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.