Literature DB >> 28847572

Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time.

Christopher C Kaeding1, Angela D Pedroza2, Emily K Reinke3, Laura J Huston3, Timothy E Hewett4, David C Flanigan5, Kurt P Spindler6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze failure rate in 2-year increments to determine if graft choice changed over time and graft failure rate.
METHODS: A prospective 2002-2008 database was used to identify risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) retear. Subjects who had primary ACL retear with no history of contralateral surgery and 2-year follow-up were included. Subjects who underwent a multiligament reconstruction were excluded. Graft type, age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, Marx activity level at index surgery, medial and lateral meniscus status at time of ACL retear, sport played after ACL reconstruction, and clinical site were evaluated. Analysis was repeated using 2002-2003 (early) and 2007-2008 (late) 2-year databases. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis was performed to detect significant differences in age and Marx score by graft type over time.
RESULTS: Two-year follow-up for graft failure was obtained on 2,497 of 2,692 (93%) subjects. There were 112 of 2,497 (4.5%) ACL retears identified at 2-year follow-up. The only predictor that changed between early/late periods was allograft use. Allograft odds ratio decreased from 13.1 to 9.5 (P < .01). Allografts were used in older patients (31-40 years) and with lower Marx scores (10-8) from early to late periods. The mean age of subjects who received bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts did not significantly change over time (22.8-23.5). The mean age of subjects who received hamstring autografts fell (27.9-25.5). The mean age of subjects who received allografts rose significantly (31.3-39.8, P < .01). The mean Marx score of subjects who received bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts did not significantly change over time. The mean Marx score of subjects who received allografts decreased significantly (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: After early recognition, allograft use in young active patients was a risk factor for retear; graft choice by surgeons changed in the late period to use of allografts in older and less-active patients, which correlated with a significant decrease in retear risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case control study.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28847572      PMCID: PMC5794339          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  57 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Joshua G Schkrohowsky; Zachary M Working; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy.

Authors:  Mark Pallis; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register.

Authors:  Lene Rahr-Wagner; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Alma Becic Pedersen; Martin Carøe Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts.

Authors:  Cory J Lamblin; Brian R Waterman; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Brian Aros; Angela Pedroza; Eric Pifel; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Warren R Dunn; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Rick W Wright; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  17 in total

1.  Athletes With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Were Slower to Meet Rehabilitation Milestones and Return-to-Sport Criteria Than Athletes With Hamstring Tendon Autograft or Soft Tissue Allograft : Secondary Analysis From the ACL-SPORTS Trial.

Authors:  Angela Hutchinson Smith; Jacob J Capin; Ryan Zarzycki; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Anterior knee pain in ACL reconstruction with BPTB graft - Is it a myth? Comparative outcome analysis with hamstring graft in 1,250 patients.

Authors:  Gopalakrishnan Janani; Perumal Suresh; Ayyadurai Prakash; Jeganathan Parthiban; Karthik Anand; Sivaraman Arumugam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Platelet-rich plasma therapy or arthroscopic surgery on repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Sepehr Eslami; Shamim Fattah; Soosan Alimohammadzade Taher; Zahra Rezasoltani
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Corrado Bait; Pietro Randelli; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Rocco Papalia; Filippo Familiari; Andrea Tecame; Paolo Adravanti; Ezio Adriani; Enrico Arnaldi; Franco Benazzo; Massimo Berruto; Giovanni Bonaspetti; Gian Luigi Canata; Pier Paolo Canè; Araldo Causero; Giancarlo Coari; Matteo Denti; Maristella Farè; Andrea Ferretti; Marco Fravisini; Francesco Giron; Alberto Gobbi; Vincenzo Madonna; Andrea Manunta; Pier Paolo Mariani; Claudio Mazzola; Giuseppe Milano; Luigi Pederzini; Flavio Quaglia; Mario Ronga; Herbert Schönhuber; Giacomo Stefani; Piero Volpi; Giacomo Zanon; Raul Zini; Claudio Zorzi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effect of Patient Height and Sex on the Patellar Tendon and Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Abigail L Campbell; Jon-Michael E Caldwell; Dheeraj Yalamanchili; Lia Sepanek; Keon Youssefzadeh; Carlos A Uquillas; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-03

7.  MOON's Strategy for Obtaining Over Eighty Percent Follow-up at 10 Years Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Isabel A Wolfe; Brooke E Turner; Laura J Huston; Caroline E Taber; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The Affect of Patient Sex and Graft Type on Postoperative Functional Outcomes After Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Milos Lesevic; Michelle E Kew; Stephan G Bodkin; David R Diduch; Stephen F Brockmeier; Mark D Miller; F Winston Gwathmey; Brian C Werner; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-23

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Partial-Thickness Quadriceps Tendon Graft Secured With a Continuous-Loop Fixation Device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Hughes; Ravi Vaswani; Christopher M Gibbs; Robert T Tisherman; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-04-03

10.  The Quad Link Technique for an All-Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Graft in Minimally Invasive, All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory R Sprowls; Brett N Robin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.