Literature DB >> 25899429

Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488 Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort.

Christopher C Kaeding1, Angela D Pedroza2, Emily K Reinke3, Laura J Huston3, Kurt P Spindler4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reinjury results in worse outcomes and increases the risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.
PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors for both ipsilateral and contralateral ACL tears after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Data from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON), a prospective longitudinal cohort, were used to identify risk factors for ACL retear. Subjects with primary ACLR, no history of contralateral knee surgery, and a minimum of 2-year follow-up data were included. Age, sex, Marx activity score, graft type, lateral meniscal tear, medial meniscal tear, sport played at index injury, and surgical facility were evaluated to determine their contribution to both ipsilateral retear and contralateral ACL tear.
RESULTS: A total of 2683 subjects with average age of 27 ± 11 years (1498 men; 56%) met all study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Overall there were 4.4% ipsilateral graft tears and 3.5% contralateral ACL tears. The odds of ipsilateral ACL retear were 5.2 times greater for an allograft (P < .01) compared with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft; the odds of retear were not significantly different between BTB autograft and hamstring autograft (P = .12). The odds of an ipsilateral ACL retear decreased by 0.09 for every yearly increase in age (P < .01) and increased by 0.11 for every increased point on the Marx score (P < .01). These odds were not significantly influenced by sex, smoking status, sport played, medial or lateral meniscal tear, or consortium site (P > .05). The odds of a contralateral ACL tear decreased by 0.04 for every yearly increase in age (P = .04) and increased by 0.12 for every increased point on the Marx score (P < .01); these odds were not significantly different between sex, smoking status, sport played, graft type, medial meniscal tear, or lateral meniscal tear (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Younger age, higher activity level, and allograft graft type were predictors of increased odds of ipsilateral graft failure. Higher activity and younger age were found to be risk factors in contralateral ACL tears.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; allograft; anterior cruciate ligament; autograft; failure; outcomes; retear

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25899429      PMCID: PMC4601557          DOI: 10.1177/0363546515578836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  64 in total

1.  The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T N Lindenfeld; J V Riccobene; F R Noyes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy.

Authors:  Mark Pallis; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register.

Authors:  Lene Rahr-Wagner; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Alma Becic Pedersen; Martin Carøe Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using patellar tendon autograft or allograft.

Authors:  D R Stringham; C J Pelmas; R T Burks; A P Newman; R L Marcus
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts.

Authors:  Cory J Lamblin; Brian R Waterman; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Brian Aros; Angela Pedroza; Eric Pifel; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Warren R Dunn; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Rick W Wright; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  142 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Incidence and Predictors of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Primary Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prediction of Autograft Hamstring Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using MRI.

Authors:  Katharine Hollnagel; Brent M Johnson; Kelley K Whitmer; Andrew Hanna; Thomas K Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Factors influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation.

Authors:  Anna M Krismer; Lampros Gousopoulos; Sandro Kohl; Atesch Ateschrang; Hendrik Kohlhof; Sufian S Ahmad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure.

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Kathrin S Bieri; Janosch Haeberli; Nele Arnout; Jan Victor; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Koesters; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Smartphone Data Capture Efficiently Augments Dictation for Knee Arthroscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Featherall; Sameer R Oak; Gregory J Strnad; Lutul D Farrow; Morgan H Jones; Anthony A Miniaci; Richard D Parker; James T Rosneck; Paul M Saluan; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  CORR Insights®: Variations in Knee Kinematics After ACL Injury and After Reconstruction Are Correlated With Bone Shape Differences.

Authors:  Robert Henry Brophy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term rate of graft failure after ACL reconstruction: a geographic population cohort analysis.

Authors:  Thomas L Sanders; Ayoosh Pareek; Timothy E Hewett; Bruce A Levy; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations.

Authors:  Joshua Robert Zadro; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.