Literature DB >> 31941691

Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.

Roosa Savolainen1, Juha M Koskinen2,3, Silja Mentula4, Janne O Koskinen5, Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel automated random-access test, mariPOC CDI (ArcDia Ltd., Finland), for the detection of Clostridioides difficile glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B directly from fecal specimens. The mariPOC test was compared with both the GenomEra C. difficile PCR assay (Abacus Diagnostica Oy, Finland) and the TechLab C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Alere Inc.; now Abbot) membrane enzyme immunoassay (MEIA). Culture and the Xpert C. difficile assay (Cepheid Inc., USA) were used to resolve discrepant results. In total, 337 specimens were tested with the mariPOC CDI test and GenomEra PCR. Of these specimens, 157 were also tested with the TechLab MEIA. The sensitivity of the mariPOC test for GDH was slightly lower (95.2%) than that obtained with the TechLab assay (100.0%), but no toxin-positive cases were missed. The sensitivity of the mariPOC test for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile by analyzing toxin expression was better (81.6%) than that of the TechLab assay (71.1%). The analytical specificities for the mariPOC and the TechLab tests were 98.3% and 100.0% for GDH and 100.0% and 99.2% for toxin A/B, respectively. The analytical specificity of the GenomEra method was 100.0%. The mariPOC and TechLab GDH tests and GenomEra PCR had high negative predictive values of 99.3%, 98.3%, and 99.7%, respectively, in excluding infection with toxigenic C. difficile The mariPOC toxin A/B test and GenomEra PCR had an identical analytical positive predictive value of 100%, providing highly reliable information about toxin expression and the presence of toxin genes, respectively.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDI; Clostridioides difficilezzm321990; Clostridium difficilezzm321990; GDH; acute gastroenteritis; diagnostics; gastrointestinal infection; glutamate dehydrogenase; mariPOC; toxin A/B

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31941691      PMCID: PMC7098770          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01872-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  42 in total

1.  Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Luis Alcalá; Elena Reigadas; Mercedes Marín; Antonia Fernández-Chico; Pilar Catalán; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M J T Crobach; T Planche; C Eckert; F Barbut; E M Terveer; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 3.  Nosocomial diarrhea: evaluation and treatment of causes other than Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Comparison of the clinical course of Clostridium difficile infection in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative patients diagnosed by PCR to those with a positive toxin test.

Authors:  J Origüen; L Corbella; M Á Orellana; M Fernández-Ruiz; F López-Medrano; R San Juan; M Lizasoain; T Ruiz-Merlo; A Morales-Cartagena; G Maestro; P Parra; J Villa; R Delgado; J M Aguado
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey.

Authors:  Martijn P Bauer; Daan W Notermans; Birgit H B van Benthem; Jon S Brazier; Mark H Wilcox; Maja Rupnik; Dominique L Monnet; Jaap T van Dissel; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; T W Chang; M Gurwith; S L Gorbach; A B Onderdonk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The significance of quantitative results of C. difficile cultures and toxin assays in patients with diarrhea.

Authors:  J M Church; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Immunological Stability of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Donna M Schora; Lance R Peterson; Elena A Usacheva
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Rapid method for detection of influenza a and B virus antigens by use of a two-photon excitation assay technique and dry-chemistry reagents.

Authors:  Janne O Koskinen; Raija Vainionpää; Niko J Meltola; Jori Soukka; Pekka E Hänninen; Aleksi E Soini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Defining the Roles of TcdA and TcdB in Localized Gastrointestinal Disease, Systemic Organ Damage, and the Host Response during Clostridium difficile Infections.

Authors:  Glen P Carter; Anjana Chakravorty; Tu Anh Pham Nguyen; Steven Mileto; Fernanda Schreiber; Lucy Li; Pauline Howarth; Simon Clare; Bliss Cunningham; Susan P Sambol; Adam Cheknis; Iris Figueroa; Stuart Johnson; Dale Gerding; Julian I Rood; Gordon Dougan; Trevor D Lawley; Dena Lyras
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.