BACKGROUND: The objective of this research is the computed axial tomography (CT) imaging grading of radiation induced pneumonitis (RP) and its correlation with clinical and radiotherapeutic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chest CT films of 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have undergone three- dimensional conformal radiation therapy were reviewed. The proposed CT grading of RP is supported on solely radiological diagnosis criteria and distinguishes five grades. The manifestation of RP was also correlated with any positive pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) history, smoking history, the FEV1 value, and the dosimetric variable V20. RESULTS: The CT grading of RP was as follows: 3 patients (15%) presented with ground glass opacity (grade 1), 9 patients (45%) were classified as grade 2, 7 patients (35%) presented with focal consolidation, with or without elements of fibrosis (grade 3), and only one patient (5%) presented with opacity with accompanying atelectasis and loss of pulmonary volume (grade 4). Both univariate and multivariate analysis revealed as prognostic factors for the radiological grading of RP the reduction of FEV1 and the V20 (P=0.026 and P=0.003, respectively). There was also a significant (P<0.001) correlation of radiological grading of RP with FEV1 and V20 (spearman rho 0.92 and 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The high correlation of the proposed radiological grading with the FEV1 and the V20 is giving a satisfactory clinical validity. Although the proposed grading scale seems relevant to clinical practice, further studies are needed for the confirmation of its validity and reliability.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this research is the computed axial tomography (CT) imaging grading of radiation induced pneumonitis (RP) and its correlation with clinical and radiotherapeutic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chest CT films of 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have undergone three- dimensional conformal radiation therapy were reviewed. The proposed CT grading of RP is supported on solely radiological diagnosis criteria and distinguishes five grades. The manifestation of RP was also correlated with any positive pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) history, smoking history, the FEV1 value, and the dosimetric variable V20. RESULTS: The CT grading of RP was as follows: 3 patients (15%) presented with ground glass opacity (grade 1), 9 patients (45%) were classified as grade 2, 7 patients (35%) presented with focal consolidation, with or without elements of fibrosis (grade 3), and only one patient (5%) presented with opacity with accompanying atelectasis and loss of pulmonary volume (grade 4). Both univariate and multivariate analysis revealed as prognostic factors for the radiological grading of RP the reduction of FEV1 and the V20 (P=0.026 and P=0.003, respectively). There was also a significant (P<0.001) correlation of radiological grading of RP with FEV1 and V20 (spearman rho 0.92 and 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The high correlation of the proposed radiological grading with the FEV1 and the V20 is giving a satisfactory clinical validity. Although the proposed grading scale seems relevant to clinical practice, further studies are needed for the confirmation of its validity and reliability.
Authors: Yi Luo; Issam El Naqa; Daniel L McShan; Dipankar Ray; Ines Lohse; Martha M Matuszak; Dawn Owen; Shruti Jolly; Theodore S Lawrence; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Vassilis Kouloulias; Eftychia Mosa; Anna Zygogianni; Efrosini Kypraiou; John Georgakopoulos; Kalliopi Platoni; Christos Antypas; George Kyrgias; Maria Tolia; Christos Papadimitriou; Amanda Psyrri; George Patatoukas; Maria Dilvoi; Christina Armpilia; Kyriaki Theodorou; Maria-Aggeliki Kalogeridi; Ivelina Beli; John Kouvaris; Nikolaos Kelekis Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Yi Luo; Shruti Jolly; David Palma; Theodore S Lawrence; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Gilmer Valdes; Daniel McShan; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam Ei Naqa Journal: Phys Med Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.119