Literature DB >> 30891794

Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage.

Sunan Cui1, Yi Luo2, Huan-Hsin Tseng2, Randall K Ten Haken2, Issam El Naqa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There has been burgeoning interest in applying machine learning methods for predicting radiotherapy outcomes. However, the imbalanced ratio of a large number of variables to a limited sample size in radiation oncology constitutes a major challenge. Therefore, dimensionality reduction methods can be a key to success. The study investigates and contrasts the application of traditional machine learning methods and deep learning approaches for outcome modeling in radiotherapy. In particular, new joint architectures based on variational autoencoder (VAE) for dimensionality reduction are presented and their application is demonstrated for the prediction of lung radiation pneumonitis (RP) from a large-scale heterogeneous dataset.
METHODS: A large-scale heterogeneous dataset containing a pool of 230 variables including clinical factors (e.g., dose, KPS, stage) and biomarkers (e.g., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), cytokines, and micro-RNAs) in a population of 106 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received radiotherapy was used for modeling RP. Twenty-two patients had grade 2 or higher RP. Four methods were investigated, including feature selection (case A) and feature extraction (case B) with traditional machine learning methods, a VAE-MLP joint architecture (case C) with deep learning and lastly, the combination of feature selection and joint architecture (case D). For feature selection, Random forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were implemented to select relevant features. Specifically, each method was run for multiple times to rank features within several cross-validated (CV) resampled sets. A collection of ranking lists were then aggregated by top 5% and Kemeny graph methods to identify the final ranking for prediction. A synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to correct for class imbalance during this process. For deep learning, a VAE-MLP joint architecture where a VAE aimed for dimensionality reduction and an MLP aimed for classification was developed. In this architecture, reconstruction loss and prediction loss were combined into a single loss function to realize simultaneous training and weights were assigned to different classes to mitigate class imbalance. To evaluate the prediction performance and conduct comparisons, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were performed for nested CVs for both handcrafted feature selections and the deep learning approach. The significance of differences in AUCs was assessed using the DeLong test of U-statistics.
RESULTS: An MLP-based method using weight pruning (WP) feature selection yielded the best performance among the different hand-crafted feature selection methods (case A), reaching an AUC of 0.804 (95% CI: 0.761-0.823) with 29 top features. A VAE-MLP joint architecture (case C) achieved a comparable but slightly lower AUC of 0.781 (95% CI: 0.737-0.808) with the size of latent dimension being 2. The combination of handcrafted features (case A) and latent representation (case D) achieved a significant AUC improvement of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.805-0.863) with 22 features (P-value = 0.000642 compared with handcrafted features only (Case A) and P-value = 0.000453 compared to VAE alone (Case C)) with an MLP classifier.
CONCLUSION: The potential for combination of traditional machine learning methods and deep learning VAE techniques has been demonstrated for dealing with limited datasets in modeling radiotherapy toxicities. Specifically, latent variables from a VAE-MLP joint architecture are able to complement handcrafted features for the prediction of RP and improve prediction over either method alone.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep neural networks; feature selection; machine learning; radiotherapy outcome modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30891794      PMCID: PMC6510637          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

Review 1.  Morbidity related to axillary irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Bentzen; S Dische
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Association of DNA repair and steroid metabolism gene polymorphisms with clinical late toxicity in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sambasivarao Damaraju; David Murray; Jennifer Dufour; Diana Carandang; Sten Myrehaug; Gino Fallone; Colin Field; Russell Greiner; John Hanson; Carol E Cass; Matthew Parliament
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Multivariable modeling of radiotherapy outcomes, including dose-volume and clinical factors.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Jeffrey Bradley; Angel I Blanco; Patricia E Lindsay; Milos Vicic; Andrew Hope; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Dose response explorer: an integrated open-source tool for exploring and modelling radiotherapy dose-volume outcome relationships.

Authors:  I El Naqa; G Suneja; P E Lindsay; A J Hope; J R Alaly; M Vicic; J D Bradley; A Apte; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Critical volume model analysis of lung complication data from different strains of mice.

Authors:  P Stavrev; N Stavreva; J Sharplin; B G Fallone; A Franko
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Physical models and simpler dosimetric descriptors of radiation late toxicity.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Charlie Pan; Avraham Eisbruch; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 7.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Yvan Saeys; Iñaki Inza; Pedro Larrañaga
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  An artificial neural network for predicting the incidence of radiation pneumonitis.

Authors:  Min Su; Moyed Miften; Curtis Whiddon; Xuejun Sun; Kim Light; Lawrence Marks
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A neural network model to predict lung radiation-induced pneumonitis.

Authors:  Shifeng Chen; Sumin Zhou; Junan Zhang; Fang-Fang Yin; Lawrence B Marks; Shiva K Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Cytokine production of lung cancer cell lines: Correlation between their production and the inflammatory/immunological responses both in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Takashi Fukuyama; Yoshinobu Ichiki; Sousuke Yamada; Yoshiki Shigematsu; Tetsuro Baba; Yoshika Nagata; Makiko Mizukami; Masakazu Sugaya; Mitsuhiro Takenoyama; Takeshi Hanagiri; Kenji Sugio; Kosei Yasumoto
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huynh; Ahmed Hosny; Christian Guthier; Danielle S Bitterman; Steven F Petit; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Benjamin Kann; Hugo J W L Aerts; Raymond H Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists.

Authors:  Sunan Cui; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Julia Pakela; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Integrating Multiomics Information in Deep Learning Architectures for Joint Actuarial Outcome Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Sunan Cui; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Radiomic prediction of radiation pneumonitis on pretreatment planning computed tomography images prior to lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Taka-Aki Hirose; Hidetaka Arimura; Kenta Ninomiya; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Jun-Ichi Fukunaga; Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Balancing accuracy and interpretability of machine learning approaches for radiation treatment outcomes modeling.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Sunan Cui; Lise Wei; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-07-04

6.  Lung Subregion Partitioning by Incremental Dose Intervals Improves Omics-Based Prediction for Acute Radiation Pneumonitis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bing Li; Xiaoli Zheng; Jiang Zhang; Saikit Lam; Wei Guo; Yunhan Wang; Sunan Cui; Xinzhi Teng; Yuanpeng Zhang; Zongrui Ma; Ta Zhou; Zhaoyang Lou; Lingguang Meng; Hong Ge; Jing Cai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Synergistic combination of a topologically invariant imaging signature and a biomarker for the accurate prediction of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis before stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung cancer: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kenta Ninomiya; Hidetaka Arimura; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Taka-Aki Hirose; Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.