BACKGROUND: In non-small-cell lung cancer radiotherapy, radiation pneumonitis≥grade 2 (RP2) depends on patients' dosimetric, clinical, biological and genomic characteristics. METHODS: We developed a Bayesian network (BN) approach to explore its potential for interpreting biophysical signaling pathways influencing RP2 from a heterogeneous dataset including single nucleotide polymorphisms, micro RNAs, cytokines, clinical data, and radiation treatment plans before and during the course of radiotherapy. Model building utilized 79 patients (21 with RP2) with complete data, and model testing used 50 additional patients with incomplete data. A developed large-scale Markov blanket approach selected relevant predictors. Resampling by k-fold cross-validation determined the optimal BN structure. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) measured performance. RESULTS: Pre- and during-treatment BNs identified biophysical signaling pathways from the patients' relevant variables to RP2 risk. Internal cross-validation for the pre-BN yielded an AUC=0.82 which improved to 0.87 by incorporating during treatment changes. In the testing dataset, the pre- and during AUCs were 0.78 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our developed BN approach successfully handled a high number of heterogeneous variables in a small dataset, demonstrating potential for unraveling relevant biophysical features that could enhance prediction of RP2, although the current observations would require further independent validation.
BACKGROUND: In non-small-cell lung cancer radiotherapy, radiation pneumonitis≥grade 2 (RP2) depends on patients' dosimetric, clinical, biological and genomic characteristics. METHODS: We developed a Bayesian network (BN) approach to explore its potential for interpreting biophysical signaling pathways influencing RP2 from a heterogeneous dataset including single nucleotide polymorphisms, micro RNAs, cytokines, clinical data, and radiation treatment plans before and during the course of radiotherapy. Model building utilized 79 patients (21 with RP2) with complete data, and model testing used 50 additional patients with incomplete data. A developed large-scale Markov blanket approach selected relevant predictors. Resampling by k-fold cross-validation determined the optimal BN structure. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) measured performance. RESULTS: Pre- and during-treatment BNs identified biophysical signaling pathways from the patients' relevant variables to RP2 risk. Internal cross-validation for the pre-BN yielded an AUC=0.82 which improved to 0.87 by incorporating during treatment changes. In the testing dataset, the pre- and during AUCs were 0.78 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our developed BN approach successfully handled a high number of heterogeneous variables in a small dataset, demonstrating potential for unraveling relevant biophysical features that could enhance prediction of RP2, although the current observations would require further independent validation.
Authors: Sambasivarao Damaraju; David Murray; Jennifer Dufour; Diana Carandang; Sten Myrehaug; Gino Fallone; Colin Field; Russell Greiner; John Hanson; Carol E Cass; Matthew Parliament Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: S L Kwa; J C Theuws; A Wagenaar; E M Damen; L J Boersma; P Baas; S H Muller; J V Lebesque Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Yi Luo; Daniel L McShan; Martha M Matuszak; Dipankar Ray; Theodore S Lawrence; Shruti Jolly; Feng-Ming Kong; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Peter G Hawkins; Philip S Boonstra; Stephen T Hobson; Jason W D Hearn; James A Hayman; Randall K Ten Haken; Martha M Matuszak; Paul Stanton; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Nithya Ramnath; Theodore S Lawrence; Matthew J Schipper; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Shruti Jolly Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-09-23 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Yi Luo; Daniel McShan; Dipankar Ray; Martha Matuszak; Shruti Jolly; Theodore Lawrence; Feng Ming Kong; Randall Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci Date: 2018-05-02
Authors: Huan-Hsin Tseng; Yi Luo; Sunan Cui; Jen-Tzung Chien; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Issam El Naqa; Sarah L Kerns; James Coates; Yi Luo; Corey Speers; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Issam El Naqa; Gaurav Pandey; Hugo Aerts; Jen-Tzung Chien; Christian Nicolaj Andreassen; Andrzej Niemierko; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: C S Mayo; M Phillips; T R McNutt; J Palta; A Dekker; R C Miller; Y Xiao; J M Moran; M M Matuszak; P Gabriel; A S Ayan; J Prisciandaro; M Thor; N Dixit; R Popple; J Killoran; E Kaleba; M Kantor; D Ruan; R Kapoor; M L Kessler; T S Lawrence Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 4.071