Yi Luo1, Shruti Jolly2, David Palma3, Theodore S Lawrence2, Huan-Hsin Tseng2, Gilmer Valdes4, Daniel McShan2, Randall K Ten Haken2, Issam Ei Naqa2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: YL1515@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A situational awareness Bayesian network (SA-BN) approach is developed to improve physicians' trust in the prediction of radiation outcomes and evaluate its performance for personalized adaptive radiotherapy (pART). METHODS: 118 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with their biophysical features were employed for discovery (n = 68) and validation (n = 50) of radiation outcomes prediction modeling. Patients' important characteristics identified by radiation experts to predict individual's tumor local control (LC) or radiation pneumonitis with grade ≥ 2 (RP2) were incorporated as expert knowledge (EK). Besides generating an EK-based naïve BN (EK-NBN), an SA-BN was developed by incorporating the EK features into pure data-driven BN (PD-BN) methods to improve the credibility of LC or / and RP2 prediction. After using area under the free-response receiver operating characteristics curve (AU-FROC) to assess the joint prediction of these outcomes, their prediction performances were compared with a regression approach based on the expert yielded estimates (EYE) penalty and its variants. RESULTS: In addition to improving the credibility of radiation outcomes prediction, the SA-BN approach outperformed the EYE penalty and its variants in terms of the joint prediction of LC and RP2. The value of AU-FROC improves from 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54-0.76) using EK-NBN, to 0.75 (0.65-0.82) using a variant of EYE penalty, to 0.83 (0.75-0.93) using PD-BN and 0.83 (0.77-0.90) using SA-BN; with similar trends in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The SA-BN approach can provide an accurate and credible human-machine interface to gain physicians' trust in clinical decision-making, which has the potential to be an important component of pART.
PURPOSE: A situational awareness Bayesian network (SA-BN) approach is developed to improve physicians' trust in the prediction of radiation outcomes and evaluate its performance for personalized adaptive radiotherapy (pART). METHODS: 118 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with their biophysical features were employed for discovery (n = 68) and validation (n = 50) of radiation outcomes prediction modeling. Patients' important characteristics identified by radiation experts to predict individual's tumor local control (LC) or radiation pneumonitis with grade ≥ 2 (RP2) were incorporated as expert knowledge (EK). Besides generating an EK-based naïve BN (EK-NBN), an SA-BN was developed by incorporating the EK features into pure data-driven BN (PD-BN) methods to improve the credibility of LC or / and RP2 prediction. After using area under the free-response receiver operating characteristics curve (AU-FROC) to assess the joint prediction of these outcomes, their prediction performances were compared with a regression approach based on the expert yielded estimates (EYE) penalty and its variants. RESULTS: In addition to improving the credibility of radiation outcomes prediction, the SA-BN approach outperformed the EYE penalty and its variants in terms of the joint prediction of LC and RP2. The value of AU-FROC improves from 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54-0.76) using EK-NBN, to 0.75 (0.65-0.82) using a variant of EYE penalty, to 0.83 (0.75-0.93) using PD-BN and 0.83 (0.77-0.90) using SA-BN; with similar trends in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The SA-BN approach can provide an accurate and credible human-machine interface to gain physicians' trust in clinical decision-making, which has the potential to be an important component of pART.
Authors: Yi Luo; Issam El Naqa; Daniel L McShan; Dipankar Ray; Ines Lohse; Martha M Matuszak; Dawn Owen; Shruti Jolly; Theodore S Lawrence; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Yi Luo; Daniel L McShan; Martha M Matuszak; Dipankar Ray; Theodore S Lawrence; Shruti Jolly; Feng-Ming Kong; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Yi Luo; Daniel McShan; Dipankar Ray; Martha Matuszak; Shruti Jolly; Theodore Lawrence; Feng Ming Kong; Randall Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa Journal: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci Date: 2018-05-02
Authors: Shulian Wang; Jeff Campbell; Matthew H Stenmark; Jing Zhao; Paul Stanton; Martha M Matuszak; Randall K Ten Haken; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeffrey D Bradley; Nantaken Ieumwananonthachai; James A Purdy; Todd H Wasserman; Mary Ann Lockett; Mary V Graham; Carlos A Perez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Efstathios D Gennatas; Jerome H Friedman; Lyle H Ungar; Romain Pirracchio; Eric Eaton; Lara G Reichmann; Yannet Interian; José Marcio Luna; Charles B Simone; Andrew Auerbach; Elier Delgado; Mark J van der Laan; Timothy D Solberg; Gilmer Valdes Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 11.205