Literature DB >> 23793508

The influence of target context and early and late vision on goal-directed reaching.

James Roberts1, James J Burkitt, Bas Willemse, Alison Ludzki, James Lyons, Digby Elliott, Lawrence E M Grierson.   

Abstract

The online visual control of movement involves contributions from 2 processes: a process early in the trajectory concerned with comparisons between actual and expected sensory consequences and another process late in the trajectory that reduces the discrepancy between the position of the hand and the target. This experiment was designed to determine how early and late visual controls are impacted by the illusory characteristics of the target in a rapid reaching task. Participants performed 500 ms movements to the vertices of Müller-Lyer figures with the availability of full vision on the majority of trials. However, on a fraction of the trials, movements to the targets were performed with either early vision (first 200 ms of movement), late vision (last 200 ms of movement) or no vision. Although participants undershoot the targets under all target and visual conditions, the impact of the target configuration was greatest when vision was available during only the final portion of the movement trajectory and least when only early vision was available for limb regulation. Aiming bias under full-vision and no-vision conditions was intermediate. These findings indicate that visual context has a greater impact on late discrete limb regulation than on early dynamic control of the limb trajectory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793508     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3614-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

Authors:  S R Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

3.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

4.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming.

Authors:  Digby Elliott; Steven Hansen; Jocelyn Mendoza; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 6.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Mendoza; Digby Elliott; Daniel V Meegan; James L Lyons; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The impact of real and illusory target perturbations on manual aiming.

Authors:  Lawrence E M Grierson; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.

Authors:  Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.

Authors:  Jocelyn Mendoza; Steve Hansen; Cheryl M Glazebrook; Katherine M Keetch; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.