Literature DB >> 18560814

Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.

Darian T Cheng1, Marlene Luis, Luc Tremblay.   

Abstract

A trial-by-trial analysis was used to systematically examine the influence of switching visual conditions on visual feedback utilization for a manual aiming movement. In experiment one, vision was randomly manipulated from trial to trial with no more than four consecutive trials in the same visual condition. In experiment two, participants were provided with certainty of visual feedback availability prior to every trial. Results of both studies revealed that movement endpoint variability was most associated with visual feedback availability on the previous trial. Furthermore, correlation analyses comparing movement trajectory at 25, 50 and 75% with movement end (i.e. 100%) revealed that the efficiency of online corrections also depends on the availability of visual feedback on the previous trial. These results suggest that the accuracy of an aiming movement is highly dependent on processing of offline visual information from the preceding trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560814     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1436-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements.

Authors:  H Z Zelaznik; B Hawkins; L Kisselburgh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming.

Authors:  Digby Elliott; Steven Hansen; Jocelyn Mendoza; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches.

Authors:  Matthew Heath
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Determinants of offline processing of visual information for the control of reaching movements.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks; Michael A Khan
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Digby Elliot; Jamie Coull; Romeo Chua; James Lyons
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R A Abrams; S Kornblum; C E Wright; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The movement of the hand towards a target.

Authors:  W D Beggs; C I Howarth
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements.

Authors:  S W Keele; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-05

10.  The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements.

Authors:  D Elliott; F Allard
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  Preceding movement effects on sequential aiming.

Authors:  Darian T Cheng; John De Grosbois; Jonathan Smirl; Matthew Heath; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Timothy N Welsh; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-08

3.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

5.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Explicit knowledge about the availability of visual feedback affects grasping with the left but not the right hand.

Authors:  Rixin Tang; Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.

Authors:  James J Burkitt; Victoria Staite; Afrisa Yeung; Digby Elliott; James L Lyons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of target context and early and late vision on goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  James Roberts; James J Burkitt; Bas Willemse; Alison Ludzki; James Lyons; Digby Elliott; Lawrence E M Grierson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Two-component models of reaching: evidence from deafferentation in a Fitts' law task.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Steven A Jax; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Effects of Reliability and Global Context on Explicit and Implicit Measures of Sensed Hand Position in Cursor-Control Tasks.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.